Jump to content
An Old School Catholic Message Board

Next Senate Minority Leader


MagiDragon

Recommended Posts

Aight guys, we all know that it was big that Bush won yesterday . . . but do you realize how important it could be that Daschle lost?!?

Tom Daschle was the Democrat's leader in the senate, and he stood for all the carp that the Dems stand for--abortion rights, gay rights . . . and well, that's really all the Dems stand for consistently.

He got voted out of office . . . so who takes his place? Probably the Minority Whip: Harry Reid. This prolly doesn't mean much to you, but this will: [quote][b]Reid opposes abortion rights[/b] and over the years, it has often been speculated that that position would prevent him from being Senate Democratic leader.
[/quote][url="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,137533,00.html"]Read full storry from Fox News[/url]

This could be an incredibly awesome opportunity for Bush to nominate some excellent judges! The only threat is the dreaded name of Clinton. She may try to take the position for herself.

Keep praying guys! There's another election coming up that matters a lot!

Peace,
Joe :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I fully hope that Hillary takes control of the Dem minority. We need a strong leader who still has her head on earth.

It's funny how conservatives only see "abortion" and "gay rights" when they see the word Democrat.

Sad because it was the democratic party that molded this country. Sad because it was the Democratic party that has always stood for the protection of those that aren't rich and those that have no say in what goes on in this Government. The Republicans have long changed since their first "good years" in which they were almost a mirror of the Democratic party.

Most Republicans of today are born-again Christians and neoconservatives who believe that imposing their believes on others only helps this planet and God is happy. Well I could care less if God is happy. And so do many others. Most focus on minor issues such as abortion because they feel that they can make another person do their will against their own personal decision.

Let me ask you something, how does it affect you, your life or your morals when a woman decides not to have a baby? Why does it affect you?

Edited by SirMyztiq
Link to comment
Share on other sites

littleflower+JMJ

actually hillary is soo off in her views she supports China's methods and how they run their country....maybe you should liev over there or even ask the many ppl who leave that country why they do so? i have.

[quote]Let me ask you something, how does it affect you, your life or your morals when a woman decides not to have a baby? Why does it affect you?[/quote]

as for your quesiton, it affects me because as a teacher that will be a student and child that i will never get to teach, know and laugh with, help become successful leaders/citizens and make a difference in their livesa nd theirs in mine.

children that this world and ALL of us will greatly be missing out on.....we all lose when a innocent life is lost...

Pax.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But don't we lose when those babies end up on welfare, adoption or federal care?

And I don't know about you, but Republicans hate those things.

The way I see it they would love to see woman having babies against their wishes but don't want to pay to support them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='SirMyztiq' date='Nov 3 2004, 11:16 PM'] Let me ask you something, how does it affect you, your life or your morals when a woman decides not to have a baby? Why does it affect you? [/quote]
if she doesn't have that baby...

that soul will have no chance to go to Heaven. we all are striving to get each other there, so i'd really like to help those babies' souls as well.

and it might sound old...

but an aborted baby... could've had a chance to run for President in 40 years, you know?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

littleflower+JMJ

[quote name='SirMyztiq' date='Nov 3 2004, 10:23 PM'] But don't we lose when those babies end up on welfare, adoption or federal care?

And I don't know about you, but Republicans hate those things.

The way I see it they would love to see woman having babies against their wishes but don't want to pay to support them. [/quote]
I'm republican and i dont' hate these things.

:) God bless you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And if the woman isn't Christian or doesn't perticularly care about going to heaven?

Let me guess,

"The woman is forever lost in a path of sin wich would only lead to her self destruction and a straight path to hell!"

Kind of hard to believe it since maybe she doesn't believe it.

[color=red][edited by flowery: attack on clergy][/color]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='littleflower' date='JMJ+Nov 3 2004, 10:24 PM'] I'm republican and i dont' hate these things.

:) God bless you. [/quote]

I've met plenty of conservatives that aren't Christian and are "conservative" when it comes to money. In fact many conservatives feel that way.

Krush and one of his friends are that way. They consider Democrats thieves and they believe that Democrats are helping the "lazy"

Well maybe the "lazy" is a mother who decided she was going to have a baby?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

why are you so angry? if your world view is correct, there's no reason to be angry unless it actually physically influences you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

littleflower+JMJ

[quote]"We have to be willing to work together but yet stand up for what we believe to be appropriate principles. And I'm going to do that." [/quote]

wow i really like when he said that!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='SirMyztiq' date='Nov 3 2004, 10:23 PM'] But don't we lose when those babies end up on welfare, adoption or federal care?

And I don't know about you, but Republicans hate those things.

The way I see it they would love to see woman having babies against their wishes but don't want to pay to support them. [/quote]
I think that is a slight bit of a generalization.

Most GOPhers want to end abortion and get all Anti welfare in the speechs. They really can't get rid of it and can't reduce it too much, they would be filabustered to no end.

And there are Dems that are pro life, just as there are GOPhers who support welfare.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...