Jump to content
An Old School Catholic Message Board

Scripture verses extra Biblical Traditions


Guest rich lk 11 28

Recommended Posts

Guest rich lk 11 28

There ar no "extra Biblical Traditions" that are neccessary for Salvation or the Church of Jesus Christ.

You can test this, take a peice of paper and write down your list of Traditions that challenge this.

I am interested in your response to this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thy Geekdom Come

Well, if the Scriptures are necessary for salvation, then don't we need to know what the Scriptures are? Therefore, the Canon of Scriptures, which is extra-Biblical, is necessary by your own argument?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thy Geekdom Come

I also find it interesting that your screenname, which (correct me if I'm wrong) leads me to Luke 11:28 gives me, "He replied, 'Rather, blessed are those who hear the word of God and observe it.'"

Tradition, an observance of the Word of God, is supported in your own screenname.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest rich lk 11 28

Rapheal,
your agrument would make sense if Scripture was from man. However it is not, Scripture is from God. Man either accepts it or rejects it. Man does not create Scripture, it is from God.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest rich lk 11 28

Dojo
Scripture is the Word of God. in Eph 6:17 we are told that the sword of the Spirit is the word of God, not the Traditions of God.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='rich lk 11 28' date='Oct 21 2004, 03:09 PM'] There ar no "extra Biblical Traditions" that are neccessary for Salvation or the Church of Jesus Christ.

You can test this, take a peice of paper and write down your list of Traditions that challenge this.

I am interested in your response to this. [/quote]
Where in the Bible does it say there are no extra biblical traditions that are neccessary for salvation? If it does not say it anywhere then I would think that you are using an extrabiblical tradition to support your claim.

On a lighter note I cannot find anything in the Catholic faith that is not implicit in scripture. The problem with you guys is you require explicitness from us while desmonstrating that implicit is an acceptable level for yourselves. i.e. there is no verse that says the Lord's Supper is just a symbol. Last I checked symbol != to remeberence. There are 273 verses in the NT that use the word faith. Only one uses the word alone next to it (and that one isn't going to help your case much, it's in James). Yet somehow we are to believe that the Bible explicitly says salvation is by faith alone.

Blessings

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thy Geekdom Come

[quote name='rich lk 11 28' date='Oct 21 2004, 04:31 PM'] Rapheal,
your agrument would make sense if Scripture was from man. However it is not, Scripture is from God. Man either accepts it or rejects it. Man does not create Scripture, it is from God. [/quote]
No, that's a red herring. Scripture is the Word of God, but nowhere in Scripture is the Canon of Scripture included. Therefore, the Tradition of the Canon of Scripture, a Tradition from outside the Scriptures, is still necessary, if in fact, we need the Scriptures.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

EcceNovaFacioOmni

The Bible is a conspiracy theory without an outside authority validating that the canon is inspired. Sola Scripture implodes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rich, my friend, you have a great deal to learn. Almost none of the Catholics on this board came to the point we are at today in ignorance. Many of us are converts from fundamentalist backrounds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the Bible is a great tool by itself for beginning a walk with God. Kind of like a 1st grade math book. But as we mature and grow in our faith we are able to progress into more in depth Christian learning. More like being in college. It's rare that you're going to pass a college class by learning and studying ONLY what's in that $150 book.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

cmotherofpirl

The Catholic Church started in 33 AD, the New Testament was canoned around 397AD by the Catholic church. We decided what books were in and what were not: the Bible as we have it today came from the Church. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rich,

You could have saved time by responding to my answers to your oft-mentioned challenge on Catholic Discussion instead of just leaving. It did not stand up there; it will not stand up here. "There are no extra-Biblical traditions required for the Church or salvation" has been repeatedly proven wrong to you and thus your constant reiteration of it borders on bearing false witness.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...