Brother Adam Posted October 2, 2004 Share Posted October 2, 2004 No Hablas Englis Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mrs. Bro. Adam Posted October 2, 2004 Share Posted October 2, 2004 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brother Adam Posted October 2, 2004 Share Posted October 2, 2004 Me 1: I like spam. It tastes pretty nifty. Me 2: Hey! quiet you! Me 1: Sorry. I go back to my box now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CreepyCrawler Posted October 2, 2004 Share Posted October 2, 2004 I think that Bush proved he's not a good public speaker and Kerry proved that he can only speak in generalities. I was so frustrated with both of them that no one 'won' the debate to me. Kerry is definitely a better public speaker, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mrs. Bro. Adam Posted October 2, 2004 Share Posted October 2, 2004 Bush has never hidden the fact that he isn't the greatest speaker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CreepyCrawler Posted October 2, 2004 Share Posted October 2, 2004 it's just frustrating listening to him, esp. when he has intelligent things to say but it takes 2 minutes of rambling to get to the good points. i doubt that people will really listen closely to try and fiddler out the babble to get to the point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iacobus Posted October 3, 2004 Share Posted October 3, 2004 [quote name='Mrs. Bro. Adam' date='Oct 2 2004, 08:29 AM'] Iacobus: Thank you for clearing that up. It's been ages since I took any form of History, and History was my worst class in school. [/quote] I love History and just got out of AP US last year so it was all pretty fresh in my mind. Article X was a biggy in our class and we covered the UN pretty well because of the Cold War. Your welcome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lounge Daddy Posted October 3, 2004 Share Posted October 3, 2004 [font="Courier"]LA TIMES POLL SUNDAY: Bush's favorability rating among debate viewers actually improved slightly (although within the survey's margin of error). Before debate, 51% of watchers viewed Bush favorably, 49% unfavorably; after, numbers were 52% and 47%... [/font] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ash Wednesday Posted October 3, 2004 Share Posted October 3, 2004 That's interesting, Lounge Daddy. What's so funny is what some Bush blogger wrote BEFORE the debate, and he was RIGHT!!!! [quote] Pre-Debate Prediction Short of something catastrophic either way, the media will all read from the same talking points that say: 1) John Kerry has found his voice and has lit a fire in his campaign 2) He was Presidential gave the American public a clear option in this election 3) The Bush campaign has to be worried because they have enjoyed great success the last 2 months beating John Kerry down without giving the public a good reason to vote for Bush. Now they must make that argument. 4) Ladies and gentlemen, we have a horserace on our hands. There are many reasons why this is their script. Glenn Reynolds touched on it earlier. I personally think they are simply too far "in the bag" to pull back now. Too much of their time and reputations have been invested to back out now. Well, up the ante all you want, the bloggers have arrived and mainstream media's best days are behind them. [/quote] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iacobus Posted October 3, 2004 Share Posted October 3, 2004 New polls I was seeing today, Kerry is ahead by a few points or dead even. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cathoholic Posted October 3, 2004 Share Posted October 3, 2004 vote for Pedro Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reelguy227 Posted October 4, 2004 Share Posted October 4, 2004 (edited) [quote name='Mrs. Bro. Adam' date='Oct 2 2004, 08:29 AM'] Is it possible that maybe, just because none were found, means that perhaps they were moved? Remember: Suddam had the capabilities of making WMD, and taking into the account of Suddam, there is a high possibility that they had been made, and then transported out of the country. Could it be possible that a scenario like that took place? [/quote] Ya I agree ,couldnt they have been hidden ? Why didnt people who call the war unreasonable because we didnt find WMDs ask themselves this question? sheesh God Bless, Ricky. Edited October 4, 2004 by reelguy227 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now