cmotherofpirl Posted September 30, 2004 Share Posted September 30, 2004 (edited) [quote name='Donna' date='Sep 30 2004, 04:06 AM'] Where are Jacinta and Francisco on the new? [/quote] St Jacinta: [url="http://www.catholic-forum.com/saints/saintj86.htm"]http://www.catholic-forum.com/saints/saintj86.htm[/url] St Francesco: [url="http://www.catholic-forum.com/saints/saintf33.htm"]http://www.catholic-forum.com/saints/saintf33.htm[/url] Edited September 30, 2004 by cmotherofpirl Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DominaNostra Posted September 30, 2004 Share Posted September 30, 2004 [quote]I'm celebrating Philomena's feast (at least w/ a smile) til the day I die, please God! They took her off the new.[/quote] Donna, that's because "she never existed" along with Saints Christopher, Simon Stock, and numerous others... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colleen Posted September 30, 2004 Share Posted September 30, 2004 [quote name='cmotherofpirl' date='Sep 30 2004, 06:29 AM'] St Jacinta: [url="http://www.catholic-forum.com/saints/saintj86.htm"]http://www.catholic-forum.com/saints/saintj86.htm[/url] St Francesco: [url="http://www.catholic-forum.com/saints/saintf33.htm"]http://www.catholic-forum.com/saints/saintf33.htm[/url] [/quote] They haven't been canonized yet, though. They're still Blessed Francisco and Jacinta. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qfnol31 Posted September 30, 2004 Share Posted September 30, 2004 [quote name='Donna' date='Sep 30 2004, 02:09 AM'] Quinullefenol 31 (can we have a nickname for you?), is it possible that St. Alphonsus spent a day in purgatory (Aug. 1st, died) before heaven (Aug. 2nd, feast)? [/quote] Donna, If you want, my name is Zachary. I like it too. Also, we celebrate it on the day of their death rather than the day of their entering into Heaven because it would be impossible for us to really know when that is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
azaelia Posted September 30, 2004 Share Posted September 30, 2004 [quote name='DominaNostra' date='Sep 30 2004, 09:44 AM'] Donna, that's because "she never existed" along with Saints Christopher, Simon Stock, and numerous others... [/quote] Oh lovely. So you're telling me my Confirmation saint "doesn't exist"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thy Geekdom Come Posted September 30, 2004 Share Posted September 30, 2004 [quote name='azaelia' date='Sep 30 2004, 02:56 PM'] Oh lovely. So you're telling me my Confirmation saint "doesn't exist"? [/quote] No, that's a misinterpretation of Church teaching. The Church says that these are no longer considered saints for public purposes because they were made "saints" by popular legend before the formal canonization process. They may have existed and may be saints, but the Church can't say for certain that they did. According to Fr. Levis on EWTN, they are still privately venerable. Furthermore, many others became "saints" by popular legend before the formal canonization process, including several people who died as Pagans (but, given their teachings, may have qualified for Baptism of Desire), including Virgil, Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle. We don't consider them to be saints anymore, either, and formally speaking, they never were declared to be saints, they were only called that by small, grass-roots efforts, but that doesn't mean they didn't exist or that they weren't holy. Virgil, in fact, was referred to by contemporaries as "Virgil Virgo" (Virgil the Virgin) because he was known for his chastity. He also wrote a poem about the golden child from heaven who would save humanity. Many Church scholars have long considered the possibility that this was private revelation made to a virtuous pagan. Fr. Peter Stravinskas, a famous priest, temporary head of the Oratory of John Henry Cardinal Newman, a frequent guest on EWTN, and an acquantance of mine, knows quite a bit on this subject. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PedroX Posted September 30, 2004 Share Posted September 30, 2004 Donna, I'm still looking for the 9-11 saint. However, this year since it fell on a Saturday we celebrated it as memorial dedicated to Our Lady, as can be done on any Saturday not given to a feast or Solemnity. Zachary, Your use of the word accurate is still misleading. We celebrate feasts solemnities etc on the days told to us by the church. The day the church gives us is the "accurate" day of the feast. Otherwise, we could never cannonize someone who died on the same day as anyone else. Raphael, While your explanation holds true for some saints, ie St. Christopher, it does not for others. Additionally, one must be very careful with these explanations. If millions of people prayed to someone who never existed would they be guilty of idolatry? Certainly you are not accusing our spiritual ancestors of this, are you? peace... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dUSt Posted September 30, 2004 Share Posted September 30, 2004 [quote name='HartfordWhalers' date='Sep 29 2004, 08:36 PM'] I believe in what the Church authentically teaches, and I believe the Pope can err when not speaking infallibly, which the Church teaches. [/quote] I think you're wrong. The pope cannot error when speaking on matters of faith or morals--it doesn't just apply to infallible statements. Picking and choosing what you wish to believe is the equivalent of Protestantism. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brother Adam Posted September 30, 2004 Share Posted September 30, 2004 Hartford, I just recieved emails over the past day from other converts who believe such positions held by other Catholics are a danger to their own Catholic faith. While I've never shared this before, you've almost convinced me twice in the past to give up belief in God. For most of us as converts, we've done enough study to know it is Catholicism or nothing. Think about it. As Dust said, your position is a dangerous one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thy Geekdom Come Posted September 30, 2004 Share Posted September 30, 2004 [quote]Raphael, While your explanation holds true for some saints, ie St. Christopher, it does not for others. Additionally, one must be very careful with these explanations. If millions of people prayed to someone who never existed would they be guilty of idolatry? Certainly you are not accusing our spiritual ancestors of this, are you?[/quote] I did not mean to imply that all saints who were made so by legend are false saints, but that, with some such saints, the Church has done retrospective study and determined that there was not sufficient evidence in the first place. Furthermore, idolatry is the worship of idols and false gods ([i]idol[/i]+[i]latria[/i]), prayer to saints who aren't saints or who never really existed wouldn't be worship anyway (prayer directed toward saints is [i]dulia[/i], as you know, not [i]latria[/i]), so it wouldn't be idolatry. However, Fr. Levis addressed this as well, saying that if, for instance, St. Christopher really doesn't exist, God would hear the prayer in good faith anyway. Certainly other saints, such as St. Jerome, St. Augustine, St. Patrick, St. Athanasius, St. Anselm, etc. have left enough proof and must be believed to be saints. In Christ, Micah PS-This information is on the saints is mostly from Fr. Peter Stravinskas and our personal conversations. Some people haven't heard of him, so I'll give you his credentials: [url="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/search-handle-url/index=books&field-author=Stravinskas%2C%252520Peter%252520M.%252520J./104-4810838-5257530"]here they are.[/url] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cmotherofpirl Posted October 1, 2004 Share Posted October 1, 2004 PHILOMENA Also known as Filomena; Filumena; Philumena; Philomene; Thaumaturga of the Nineteenth Century; Wonder Worker of the Nineteenth Century Memorial 11 August; cultus suppressed in 1961 by Pope John XXIII due to the lack of historical information Profile Little is known of her life, and the information was have was received by private revelation from her. Martyred at about age 14 in the early days of the Church. In 1802 the remains of a young woman were found in the catacomb of Saint Priscilla on the Via Salaria. It was covered by stones, the symbols on which indicated that the body was a martyr named Saint Philomena. The bones were exhumed, cataloged, and effectively forgotten since there was so little known about the person. In 1805 Canon Francis de Lucia of Mugnano, Italy was in the Treasury of the Rare Collection of Christian Antiquity (Treasury of Relics) in the Vatican. When he reached the relics of Saint Philomena he was suddenly struck with a spiritual joy, and requested that he be allowed to enshrine them in a chapel in Mugnano. After some disagreements, settled by the cure of Canon Francis following prayers to Philomena, he was allowed to translate the relics to Mugnano. Miracles began to be reported at the shrine including cures of cancer, healing of wounds, and the Miracle of Mugnano in which Venerable Pauline Jaricot was cured a severe heart ailment overnight. Philomena became the only person recognized as a Saint solely on the basis of miraculous intercession as nothing historical was known of her except her name and the evidence of her martyrdom. Pope Leo XII granted permission for the erection of altars and churches in her honor. Pope Gregory XVI authorized her public veneration, and named her patroness of the Living Rosary. The cure of Pope Pius IX, while archbishop of Imola, was attributed to Philomena; in 1849, he named her patroness of the Children of Mary. Pope Leo XIII approved the Confraternity of Saint Philomena, and raised it to an Archconfraternity. Pope Pius X raised the Archconfraternity to a Universal Archconfraternity, and named Saint John Vianney its patron. Saint John Vianney himself called Philomena the New Light of the Church Militant, and had a strong and well-known devotion to her. Others with known devotion to her include Saint Anthony Mary Claret, Saint Euphrasia Pelletier, Saint Francis Xavier Cabrini, Saint John Nepomucene Neumann, Saint Madeline Sophie Barat, Saint Peter Chanel, Saint Peter Julian Eymard, Blessed Anna Maria Taigi, and Venerable Pauline Jaricot. Died relics discovered on 24 May 1802; relics translated to Mugnano, Italy on 10 August 1805 Canonized by Pope Gregory XVI Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qfnol31 Posted October 1, 2004 Share Posted October 1, 2004 (edited) [quote name='PedroX' date='Sep 30 2004, 03:50 PM'] Zachary, Your use of the word accurate is still misleading. We celebrate feasts solemnities etc on the days told to us by the church. The day the church gives us is the "accurate" day of the feast. Otherwise, we could never cannonize someone who died on the same day as anyone else. [/quote] What I meant by more accurate is that it is closer to the actual day than before (in one of my earlier posts). I agree that not all are on their actual day of death, but often that's because the Church wanted to celebrate their feast days as well as those on the day they died. Edited October 1, 2004 by qfnol31 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EcceNovaFacioOmni Posted October 1, 2004 Share Posted October 1, 2004 What about St. Ursula? There are many things named for her but I hear she never existed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HartfordWhalers Posted October 1, 2004 Author Share Posted October 1, 2004 [quote name='azaelia' date='Sep 30 2004, 01:56 PM'] Oh lovely. So you're telling me my Confirmation saint "doesn't exist"? [/quote] No no no! On the contrary, he was saying that the current hierarchy/majority of Catholics say that those people never existed, though those who believe in what the Chuch has always taught, that these people did exist, say that all of them ARE real people. I assume he believes they existed too, considering his posts here being traditional and that he used "don't exist" in quotes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Donna Posted October 1, 2004 Share Posted October 1, 2004 [color=orange]See-Mom![/color] Thank you. Double thank you for posting on Philomena ( ) [color=gray]Raphael, [/color] with all due respect, I'll believe that Philomena being raised in succession by the Church [i]then[/i] is appropo [i]now.[/i] [color=purple]PedroX![/color] Thanks pal. [color=green]Zachary,[/color] I like my explanation better. I believe the Church somehow knows, for example, if St. Alphonsus went to heaven the day after he died. [color=red]Bro Adam,[/color] With all the assaults bombarding each of us, I hope you read [i]Pascendi[/i] if you get a chance. The last sainted Pope wanted us to know about the doctrine of the Modernists, and the remedies to squelch the attack. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now