MorphRC Posted September 22, 2004 Share Posted September 22, 2004 So Im just suppose to believe now eh... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
azaelia Posted September 23, 2004 Share Posted September 23, 2004 Morph, your sarcasm is out of line. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BullnaChinaShop Posted September 23, 2004 Share Posted September 23, 2004 [quote name='MorphRC' date='Sep 22 2004, 02:49 AM'] So Im just suppose to believe now eh... [/quote] And I guess you were supposed to just disbelieve it before eh... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Donna Posted September 23, 2004 Share Posted September 23, 2004 (How's it going, Papa Bull?) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BullnaChinaShop Posted September 23, 2004 Share Posted September 23, 2004 [quote name='Donna' date='Sep 23 2004, 02:24 PM'] (How's it going, Papa Bull?) [/quote] (Pretty good how about yourself?) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DojoGrant Posted September 24, 2004 Share Posted September 24, 2004 Does anyone know when it will be on display again for veneration? I know they do it at some regular interval (every X number of years, I think). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shroudie Posted September 26, 2004 Share Posted September 26, 2004 Donna, you wrote: [quote]The scientific concensus is that the image was produced by something which resulted in oxidation, dehydration and conjugation of the polysaccharide structure of the microfibrils of the linen itself. [/quote] The concensus of thinking has changed a bit. The significance is dramatic. We should now be saying (and those who wrote the consensus statement are saying it): "of [b][color=red]a [/color][/b]polysaccharide structure [b][color=red]clinging to [/color][/b]the microfibrils of the linen itself." I've tried to explain this a bit in the following pictorial essay. [url="http://www.shroudforum.com"]Nobody Can Explain the Pictures of Jesus on the Shroud of Turin[/url] Let me know what you think. Any suggestions? Any glaring errors? Dan Porter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shroudie Posted September 28, 2004 Share Posted September 28, 2004 [quote name='MorphRC' date='Sep 22 2004, 12:01 AM']its been proven to be a medievil fake.[/quote] No, it has not. If you are referring to the carbon 14 testing from 1988, that must be discounted because we now know that the samples used were invalid. The sample area is chemically different from the rest of the cloth. No, it has not been proven medieval. Not by a long shot. Shroudie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Donna Posted September 30, 2004 Share Posted September 30, 2004 Hi, Dan. Wow, you [b]are[/b] a Shroudie! Ulp, I must confess that what little I know about the Shroud was explained [i]repeatedly[/i] to me in layman's terms...and so I did read your article, but do not understand enough to make comment...or at least not this morn. It's so you've chimed in to Phatmass! I should add, that I didn't write what you quoted me as...it is from the STURP site. Do you know who Brother Bruno is? Are you from Europe? [color=green]May the Holy Face of Jesus shine upon you![/color] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now