HartfordWhalers Posted September 13, 2004 Share Posted September 13, 2004 [quote name='Paladin D' date='Sep 13 2004, 02:17 PM'] And just because you reject Vatican II, doesn't mean it's [b]"OK"[/b]. [/quote] LOL and which of the two things that I listed rejects VII? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brother Adam Posted September 13, 2004 Author Share Posted September 13, 2004 Dangit. And I paid $16 for it. I should have known something fishy was up when it had the Methodist endorsement. That makes me mad. What is wrong with these Catholic priests giving approval to such trash. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HartfordWhalers Posted September 13, 2004 Share Posted September 13, 2004 [quote name='Brother Adam' date='Sep 13 2004, 04:23 PM'] Dangit. And I paid $16 for it. I should have known something fishy was up when it had the Methodist endorsement. That makes me mad. What is wrong with these Catholic priests giving approval to such trash. [/quote] I don't know... didn't happen 60 years ago... maybe it has tro do with the "understanding" of outside the Church no salvation? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kateri05 Posted September 13, 2004 Share Posted September 13, 2004 hey bro adam, cant you return it and get a REGULAR jerusalem bible? sounds like its the new one thats phishy. i dont know if you still have the receipt.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cure of Ars Posted September 13, 2004 Share Posted September 13, 2004 I agree with what kateri05 said. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apotheoun Posted September 13, 2004 Share Posted September 13, 2004 For theological and anthropological reasons I avoid scripture translations that are "gender neutral." I prefer the RSV Catholic edition of the Bible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kateri05 Posted September 13, 2004 Share Posted September 13, 2004 (edited) [quote name='Apotheoun' date='Sep 13 2004, 06:29 PM'] For theological and anthropological reasons I avoid scripture translations that are "gender neutral."Â I prefer the RSV Catholic edition of the Bible. [/quote] i agree; the inspired Word of God wasn't gender neutral, so clearly God didn't mean for it to be that way. and if people aren't intelligent enough to infer that when St. Paul (or whoever) says mankind, hes referring to EVERYONE, in this Church where we are neither "male nor female, slave nor free, Jew nor Greek," than that is THEIR problem, not the translation. :angry: i mean, this is the same Church of the same Jesus Christ who had women for friends, whose first witness to the Resurrection was a woman. CLEARLY, we are inclusive! Edited September 13, 2004 by kateri05 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ellenita Posted September 14, 2004 Share Posted September 14, 2004 [quote]I prefer the RSV Catholic edition of the Bible. [/quote] You need to be careful when you are buying this translation too as there is also a [b]NEW[/b] RSV which has inclusive language! Just as there is a [b]new[/b] English Bible and presumably a [b]new[/b] American Bible....... [quote]hey bro adam, cant you return it and get a REGULAR jerusalem bible? sounds like its the new one thats phishy. i dont know if you still have the receipt.... [/quote] Good luck with trying to find a copy of the old version Bro Adam - there isn't a book store in London that does it as far as I've been able to discover, and that includes the Catholic bookshops. I've been trying to find a replacement copy for the one that I bought in 1979 - it's most frustrating! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Cube Posted September 14, 2004 Share Posted September 14, 2004 [b][u]The Jerusalem Bible, Reader's Edition[/u][/b], which has a nihil obstat and imprimatur, was reprinted by Doubleday in 2000. You can order it from any bookstore; the [b]ISBN[/b] number is [b]0-385-49918-3[/b]. It's not gender-neutral. I hope you enjoy it, it's a beautiful bible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apotheoun Posted September 14, 2004 Share Posted September 14, 2004 [quote name='Ellenita' date='Sep 13 2004, 05:22 PM'] You need to be careful when you are buying this translation too as there is also a [b]NEW[/b] RSV which has inclusive language! [/quote] Yes, be sure to get the Ignatius Bible (RSV Catholic edition), it is the older RSV (not the NRSV) and does not use inclusive language. It is published by Ignatius Press. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MorphRC Posted September 14, 2004 Share Posted September 14, 2004 What is rendered for Luke 1:28 in the RSVCE? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
homeschoolmom Posted September 14, 2004 Share Posted September 14, 2004 I think it's Hail, O favored one... but I'm not positive... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MorphRC Posted September 14, 2004 Share Posted September 14, 2004 I dont why the Church or people in the Church allow the continued mistranslation of that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apotheoun Posted January 11, 2005 Share Posted January 11, 2005 [quote name='MorphRC' date='Sep 14 2004, 01:08 AM'] What is rendered for Luke 1:28 in the RSVCE? [/quote] The translation of Luke 1:28 in the RSV is, "And he came to her and said, 'Hail, O favored one, the Lord is with you!'"; while in the RSVCE it is translated as, "And he came to her and said, 'Hail, [i]full of grace[/i], the Lord is with you!'" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
myduwigd Posted January 11, 2005 Share Posted January 11, 2005 why is it called the New Jerusalem Bible? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now