Thy Geekdom Come Posted November 15, 2004 Share Posted November 15, 2004 [quote name='noncatholicname' date='Nov 15 2004, 06:01 PM'] When did the Catholic Church start teaching this? Did they suddenly agree with the westminster confession recently? [/quote] I think the confusion is over the believe in the Catholic Church that works support our faith. Works do help to provide a framework for growth in the faith and they do help us to merit sanctifying grace...sort of like we take a withdrawal from the economy of salvation Christ stored up for us. Sanctifying grace helps us to grow in the faith. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
noncatholicname Posted November 15, 2004 Share Posted November 15, 2004 [quote name='Raphael' date='Nov 15 2004, 05:08 PM'] I think the confusion is over the believe in the Catholic Church that works support our faith. Works do help to provide a framework for growth in the faith and they do help us to merit sanctifying grace...sort of like we take a withdrawal from the economy of salvation Christ stored up for us. Sanctifying grace helps us to grow in the faith. [/quote] Works do the work, but not the HOLY SPIRIT? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thy Geekdom Come Posted November 15, 2004 Share Posted November 15, 2004 [quote name='noncatholicname' date='Nov 15 2004, 06:10 PM'] Works do the work, but not the HOLY SPIRIT? [/quote] 1. Sanctifying grace is not the same as saving grace. 2. Grace is always bestowed by the Holy Spirit. 3. The Holy Spirit inspires an action. We respond with a "fiat," and do the action, whether it is prayer, physical work, some miracle, etc. We receive sanctifying grace, not because of the works we do, but because we have consented to the prompting of the Holy Spirit. That is, the Holy Spirit offers a grace and we consent to receive it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StColette Posted November 15, 2004 Share Posted November 15, 2004 As the others have said, the Church has always taught that we are saved by our faith. But as the Bible says in James 2:26 "For just as a body without a spirit is dead, so also faith without works is dead." The works which we do for God, ie giving to the poor, visiting the sick, etc. we do these things because God wishes us to, which is evident in the Gospel of Matthew 25:31-41, it gives examples of things that we should do for others, because God wants us to. Works don't bring glory to ourselves, they bring glory to God, for in doing them we are fufilling what He wills for us to do. Thus you see the importance of doing these things, for God, not for ourselves. He wants to see all His children cared for and loved, not abandoned and pushed away to the side and forgotten. The Holy Spirit guides us in each thing that we do for God. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thy Geekdom Come Posted November 15, 2004 Share Posted November 15, 2004 [quote name='StColette' date='Nov 15 2004, 06:16 PM'] As the others have said, the Church has always taught that we are saved by our faith. But as the Bible says in James 2:26 "For just as a body without a spirit is dead, so also faith without works is dead." The works which we do for God, ie giving to the poor, visiting the sick, etc. we do these things because God wishes us to, which is evident in the Gospel of Matthew 25:31-41, it gives examples of things that we should do for others, because God wants us to. Works don't bring glory to ourselves, they bring glory to God, for in doing them we are fufilling what He wills for us to do. Thus you see the importance of doing these things, for God, not for ourselves. He wants to see all His children cared for and loved, not abandoned and pushed away to the side and forgotten. The Holy Spirit guides us in each thing that we do for God. [/quote] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
noncatholicname Posted November 15, 2004 Share Posted November 15, 2004 So I'm going to ask you the same question I asked some catholics who came to an evangelical website. So, the whole matter of the reformation was just a big misunderstanding? People killing each other, calling anathemas, all of it just a misunderstanding? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thy Geekdom Come Posted November 15, 2004 Share Posted November 15, 2004 [quote name='noncatholicname' date='Nov 15 2004, 06:22 PM'] So I'm going to ask you the same question I asked some catholics who came to an evangelical website. So, the whole matter of the reformation was just a big misunderstanding? People killing each other, calling anathemas, all of it just a misunderstanding? [/quote] 1. There were many more issues in the Reformation than the problem between Faith and Works. 2. Some early followers of Luther actually met with Catholic theologians and agreed with them on the Faith and Works debate. I'm afraid I've only been told this by a reputable apologist and don't have a source...maybe someone else will. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StColette Posted November 15, 2004 Share Posted November 15, 2004 (edited) First, the Reformation was bringing into light the "people" who had brought corruption into the Church, it was not the Church, itself, but some of the people within it. Some like to step so far as to say that the entire Church was evil during that period, this was not the case. The case is that people of the clergy are human beings and capable of error. And there were many things that brought about the Reformation it was not solely on faith and works. Also during the time in which the Reformation was still taking place, there was a Reformation within the Catholic Church. Which means that they went through and fixed the problems that were addressed. People often forget that there was a reformation within the Church to correct the errors of some of the people within Her. Edited November 15, 2004 by StColette Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CatholicCrusader Posted November 15, 2004 Share Posted November 15, 2004 (edited) Double post... Edited November 15, 2004 by CatholicCrusader Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CatholicCrusader Posted November 15, 2004 Share Posted November 15, 2004 (edited) [quote]You've got ALOT to learn. It is not a mortal sin to miss Mass. It may be venial but certainly not mortal. And venial only because you think youve got something more important to do than spending time with God.[/quote] NO, YOU have a lot to learn. Missing Mass IS a mortal sin. Is it not embarrassing that a PROTESTANT knows more about the Faith than you do? "And venial only because you think youve got something more important to do than spending time with God." And even the reason that you think it is venial is a protestantized reason. The reason is BECAUSE THE CHURCH SAYS SO. Here we see the perfect example of the "great Vatican II has done": hardly if any catechesis whatsoever... I mean come on-- protestants who hate the Church know more than those who claim to be Catholic, and even those who are actively involved in Catholic message boards. I suppose this reflects on phatmass, as well. Quietfire is very involved here, yet she has not read that it is a mortal sin to miss Mass on Sunday or Holy Days of Obligation? That is ridiculous, as well. Maybe if more people were interested in discussing the Faith instead of "open mic" discussions, such as "person below me" and like games, phatmass would better reflect an educated Catholic youth, who are interested in their Faith and want to spread it. [quote]It is not a sin to not pray the rosary. But if you did, which you obviously dont, then you would understand what it means to find solace and peace in doing so.[/quote] And, yes, it is a sin not to pray the Rosary daily. It is a venial sin not to make your morning and night prayers. If you are a Priest, it is a sin not to say the Office. It could be a mortal sin not to; I am not sure about that. Look at any good examination of conscience on the First Commandment or on the Virtue of Faith. Basically, you are looking at this in a minimalistic sense (which, funny enough, is what Novus Ordo-ers say the Church was before Vatican II). Instead of trying to make excuses for not doing this or that (here not going to Mass or not praying the Rosary) and instead of trying to say there is nothing (or little) wrong with either, look at it as: what would the Saints do? How many Saints are there who didn't pray the Rosary daily (that is, after Our Lady gave it to man, of course)? I don't think there is even one canonized Saint who didn't. The same with the number of canonized Saints who didn't go to Mass everyday or as many days as possible (under persecution Mass could not always be said everyday). [quote]Praying the rosary daily has become one of the reasons I look foward to getting out of bed everyday.  Im alive, allow me to thank God for that. Because no one else had anything to do with it. [/quote] Actually, if the Rosary is one of the reasons... then Our Lady had something to do with it, as well... Edited November 15, 2004 by CatholicCrusader Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StColette Posted November 15, 2004 Share Posted November 15, 2004 [quote name='CatholicCrusader' date='Nov 15 2004, 05:41 PM'] NO, YOU have a lot to learn. Missing Mass IS a mortal sin. Is it not embarrassing that a PROTESTANT knows more about the Faith than you do? [/quote] You know corrections can be made without ridiculing the person Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CatholicCrusader Posted November 15, 2004 Share Posted November 15, 2004 (edited) [quote name='StColette' date='Nov 15 2004, 06:42 PM'] You know corrections can be made without ridiculing the person [/quote] I corrected her the exact same way she corrected noncatholicname I figured either: 1) it wouldn't upset her, since she did it herself, or 2) she would realized "oh, what I said was not very nice--maybe I shouldn't correct people like that". Either way, I think that what I said was an effective way of accomplishing the goal. *Edit: As far as the comment asking if it was embarrassing to know less than a protestant about the Church, the goal was to have Quietfire say: "yes" and to hopefully seek out a good examination of conscience and do more reading about the Church instead, maybe, than on phatmass. If that was an ineffective way to do that, then I am sorry Quietfire. I hope you will do that, though, as it is not a good thing to not have an informed conscience as to what is and is not sin and whether or not it is mortal. Edited November 15, 2004 by CatholicCrusader Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
noncatholicname Posted November 15, 2004 Share Posted November 15, 2004 And all the people burned at the stake for heresy? All a misunderstanding? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
noncatholicname Posted November 15, 2004 Share Posted November 15, 2004 [quote name='CatholicCrusader' date='Nov 15 2004, 05:49 PM'] I corrected her the exact same way she corrected noncatholicname I figured either: 1) it wouldn't upset her, since she did it herself, or 2) she would realized "oh, what I said was not very nice--maybe I shouldn't correct people like that". Either way, I think that what I said was an effective way of accomplishing the goal. [/quote] Actually, I didn't take any offense at all. I know I'm right so you can't touch me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StColette Posted November 15, 2004 Share Posted November 15, 2004 (edited) ignore lol CC edited his post Edited November 15, 2004 by StColette Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now