MorphRC Posted August 17, 2004 Share Posted August 17, 2004 [font="Times"][b]Papacy.[/b][/font] [b]III HISTORY [/b] Archaeological and literary evidence supports the belief that St Peter was martyred in Rome and [b]even that he was buried in the traditional site under the main altar of St Peter's Basilica[/b], but the precise role he played in the Christian community in Rome before his death is not known. [b]Papacy. Microsoft ® Encarta ® Encyclopedia 2004. © 1993-2003 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.[/b] [b]-----------------------------------------------------------------------[/b] [b]even that he was buried in the traditional site under the main altar of St Peter's Basilica[/b] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Theoketos Posted August 17, 2004 Share Posted August 17, 2004 The problem I see with many of these Encarta References is that they were probably written by a Catholic Scholar who was consulted by them. But they still work, shh I did not really say that ^ too loud. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MorphRC Posted August 17, 2004 Author Share Posted August 17, 2004 No they're not. They dont use any scholar related to the subject. Its secular, so say. Im Catholic, you wouldnt get me to write an article on the Papacy. You'd get someone else, with equal qualifications as to avoid my bias of being Catholic into the subject. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crusader_4 Posted August 17, 2004 Share Posted August 17, 2004 (edited) ACtually the proof for St. Peter under the altar is staggering really to suggest otherwise doesnt make much sense and i know there are people who say St. Peter was not in Rome because he is not mentioned in the Epistle to the Romans but when you think about it your Church under a time of persecution when the letters could be intercepted and used for the persecution its generally not a good idea to say to the leader of the Church "Hey Peter hows Rome treating yah?" Edited August 17, 2004 by Crusader_4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MorphRC Posted August 18, 2004 Author Share Posted August 18, 2004 1 Peter 5:13 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phatcatholic Posted August 18, 2004 Share Posted August 18, 2004 [b]Peter's Roman Residency[/b] --[url="http://www.catholic.com/library/Peter_Roman_Residency.asp"]Peter's Roman Residency[/url] --[url="http://www.catholic.com/library/Was_Peter_in_Rome.asp"]Was Peter in Rome?[/url] --[url="http://www.bringyou.to/apologetics/num13.htm"]Was St. Peter Ever in Rome?--Refuting a Persistent Protestant Prejudice[/url] --[url="http://www.cuf.org/member/sspeterandpaul.pdf"]Saints Peter and Paul[/url] --[url="http://www.catholicapologetics.net/apolo_74.htm"]The Archeological Proof[/url] --[url="http://www.catholicapologetics.net/Paul_Peter_Rome.htm"]A Reply to: "St. Paul's Epistles From Rome Never Mention Peter As Being There"[/url] --[url="http://www.cin.org/users/jgallegos/rome.htm"]Peter in Rome[/url] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aloysius Posted August 18, 2004 Share Posted August 18, 2004 I almost thought that said "Peter's Roman Presidency" lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EcceNovaFacioOmni Posted August 18, 2004 Share Posted August 18, 2004 He he I've actually seen "Peter's Roman Presidency" used before in apologetics. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MorphRC Posted August 19, 2004 Author Share Posted August 19, 2004 Kool Phat! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now