Jump to content
An Old School Catholic Message Board

Traditional & Roman Catholic Mass.


White Knight

Recommended Posts

White Knight

Is there any different in how Traditional Catholics and Roman Catholics Preform/Celebrate Mass? other than the Language difference?


I know Roman Catholic's normally do Mass in English Ive heard, while Traditional do it in Latin or something.


Is there any other difference in how they preform MASS?


I'm wondering, because, Mel Gibson left the Vatican II System and went back to Traditional methods.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As I understood it, the Vatican II liturgy attempted to get back to the basics or original form. The people who left the Catholic Church over the changes obviously had no sense of obedience to Christ's Church and the authority He Himself invested in the Magisterium. A mixture of pride and a lack of obedience I think, and probably confusion. Not to mention forgetting some not so favourable popes in the Church’s history, I don’t think there were many people jumping ship back then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also I think it is important to remember that the liturgy we are tlaking about only applied to the Latin Rite, there are many other rites of the Catholic Church where they don't and never did use Latin in their liturgy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

toledo_jesus

the danger we find, and I think this is what those people who left after Vatican II were worried about, is that there is the actual Vatican II, and the "spirit" of Vatican II. the spirit of Vatican II has been grossly misrepresented by people who wish to for instance, use wonder bread at Mass, or ordain women.
The actual Vatican II was perfectly legit. still is...

Edited by toledo_jesus
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='White Knight' date='Aug 16 2004, 05:00 PM'] Is there any different in how Traditional Catholics and Roman Catholics Preform/Celebrate Mass? other than the Language difference?

I know Roman Catholic's normally do Mass in English Ive heard, while Traditional do it in Latin or something.

Is there any other difference in how they preform MASS?

I'm wondering, because, Mel Gibson left the Vatican II System and went back to Traditional methods. [/quote]
There is no such things as a "traditionalist" Catholic, one is either a Catholic or not, and to be Catholic one must be in communion with the Pope.

As far as the liturgy is concerned, the present Holy Father permits the Ordo Missae of Pius V as an indult, i.e., as an exception to the norm, while the universal norm for celebrating Mass in the Roman Rite is the Ordo Missae of Paul VI. As long as a person in the Roman Rite is in communion with the Pope and goes to one of these two services, he is in good standing in the Church. Now I, as a Byzantine Rite Catholic, go to the Divine Liturgy of St. John Chrysostom, and during certain times of the year the Liturgy of St. Basil, which are the customary liturgical celebrations for Eastern Catholics.

There are many different liturgical rites within the one Catholic Church, but the important thing is to be in communion with the Pope, the Sucessor of St. Peter, because he is the visible point of unity within the Church.

God bless,
Todd

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I could go on for a while about some of the differences between the two, and there are probably some better things in each.

:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

cmotherofpirl

As long as the essential elements are present it is a valid Mass.

Edited by cmotherofpirl
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ive seen a Video of the Latin Mass [Low] and Been to the Norvus Ordo, and there is a lot more Ritual in the latin Mass, bending, bowing kneeling and blessing ones self.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

cmotherofpirl

More bowing and blessing does not increase the value of a Mass. Somewhere in Church history someone added a last gospel to the Tridentine rite. It was an add-on.

Edited by cmotherofpirl
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote]There is no such things as a "traditionalist" Catholic, one is either a Catholic or not, and to be Catholic one must be in communion with the Pope.[/quote]

Amen

But I think to answer the orginal question, some people follow the GIRM before 1963 and Some People Follow the New Order of the Mass (Novus Ordo) and some people are of the Eastern Rites which have a similar but strikingly different and at the same time a beautiful liturgy.

And then are many many people, who bind the liturgy in chains of pride.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='cmotherofpirl' date='Aug 18 2004, 01:48 AM'] More bowing and blessing does not increase the value of a Mass. Somewhere in Church history someone added a last gospel to the Tridentine rite. It was an add-on. [/quote]
I didnt say that. Dont be so defensive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

what's wrong with add-ons? sheesh, i havta agree with Morph... it was a bit too defensive for the observations about the differences he provided

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another difference is the vestments. The Latin Mass priest wears some other vestment. I am not sure of the name of them. Maybe someone could help here. Anyway one is a wide band of cloth that goes around the arm of the priests forearm.

Another thing is the setup of the Church. In Latin Masses, the priest faces the tabernacle. In the Novus Ordo the priest faces the people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

cmotherofpirl

[quote name='MorphRC' date='Aug 17 2004, 03:15 PM'] I didnt say that. Dont be so defensive. [/quote]
Morph that wasn't addresssed to you in particular, many people just seem to think the more bows the better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...