P3chrmd Posted August 9, 2004 Share Posted August 9, 2004 [quote]Which meaning? The American Meaning of terrorist, the feminist one, or the 'normal one'? [/quote] The kind that supports the murder of babies! and CLAIMS to be catholic Our Lady of Guadalupe...partroness of the unborn...pray for us!!!! GO BUSH 2004! REPUBLICANS RULE!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P3chrmd Posted August 9, 2004 Share Posted August 9, 2004 [quote]Most media outlets tend to lean towards a Liberal bias,[/quote] except for the awsome FOX NEWS! THE BEST! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M.SIGGA Posted August 9, 2004 Share Posted August 9, 2004 P3chrmd, really nice avatar! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MorphRC Posted August 9, 2004 Author Share Posted August 9, 2004 [quote]I've seen the news, of course. However, we don't know that there is more terrorism now because we don't know what it was like under Saddam as far as extent. Furthermore, these terror attacks are caused by insurgents. You cannot rationally blame this on George Bush. Furthermore, since George Bush is not responsible for these attacks and since the US is fighting them at his command, you cannot rationally call Bush a terrorist.[/quote] Yes you can. If he had not attacked iraq, would there be insurgents there? No. Why? because the US isnt there. Its indirectly responsible thru his unjust war. [quote]Have you been watching the news, lately? Those are insurgents! They are not Iraqis! The Iraqi people have been helping Americans to build schools, train police, set up local government. The Iraqi people are accepting democratic government very well. [/quote] Thats what the Media says, and some are, have you heard of [b]AL SADR!![/b]. [quote]I listen to a free media for a free people. I don't know what you're listening to or reading. [/quote] I read all newspapers, and watch all news programs, I dont stick to one. [quote]Most of it is free of fire. The Saudis are at fault for the oil prices. [/quote] And Russians Eiko. But the Oil CEOs are blaming Iraq, even though it has no pull on the oil economy at this point. [quote]How do you get off saying that? I am not Arab nor do I look remotely Arab, and I was in the capital a couple weeks ago. I was wanded at several locations. I had to walk through numerous metal detectors. The security treats all people equally. All people are treated well. Trust me, if they weren't, the ACLU would be all over it. However, it is also unreasonable to assume that a man of European dissent is as likely to be an Al-Qaeda terrorist, since they are most often Arab Muslims. That does not mean that white people or anyone else is incapable of terror, but it does mean that they are less likely to belong to this terrorist cause. I am SO sick of political correctness.[/quote] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MorphRC Posted August 9, 2004 Author Share Posted August 9, 2004 [quote]Most media outlets tend to lean towards a Liberal bias, and considering "bad news" usually draws the crowds... of course they'll report mostly negatives of the Iraqi situation.[/quote] Our Media, Channel 7, show as much good as possible, but their isnt much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MorphRC Posted August 9, 2004 Author Share Posted August 9, 2004 [quote name='P3chrmd' date='Aug 9 2004, 02:46 PM'] The kind that supports the murder of babies! and CLAIMS to be catholic Our Lady of Guadalupe...partroness of the unborn...pray for us!!!! GO BUSH 2004! REPUBLICANS RULE!!!! [/quote] DITTO! Vote Bush, Vote For War! Vote Kerry, Vote For Baby slaughter GO AMERICAN DEMOCRACY!.. -_- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paladin D Posted August 9, 2004 Share Posted August 9, 2004 [b]Morph[/b], it's fine if you believe GWB is not the best politican. However, to label him a [b]terrorist[/b] is an extreme claim that has very little basis, only consisted of assumptions and prejuidice. I would rather have GWB in office for 4 more years, than a flip-flopping, baby-killing, war-criming, self-proclaimed Catholic hypocrit (John Kerry). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MorphRC Posted August 9, 2004 Author Share Posted August 9, 2004 [quote name='Paladin D' date='Aug 9 2004, 03:01 PM'] [b]Morph[/b], it's fine if you believe GWB is not the best politican. However, to label him a [b]terrorist[/b] is an extreme claim that has very little basis, only consisted of assumptions and prejuidice. I would rather have GWB in office for 4 more years, than a flip-flopping, baby-killing, war-criming, self-proclaimed Catholic hypocrit (John Kerry). [/quote] Not Really. His Actions terrorize a lot of people. Mainly Muslims. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qfnol31 Posted August 9, 2004 Share Posted August 9, 2004 Vote for someone who has a chance, or risk having Kerry win... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MorphRC Posted August 9, 2004 Author Share Posted August 9, 2004 Why would you give a war-mongerer more power? Its stupid to vote for someone just because they might have a better chance than someone else, its also irresponsible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qfnol31 Posted August 9, 2004 Share Posted August 9, 2004 Because I absolutely do not want Kerry in charge. Why is that risk worth it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MorphRC Posted August 9, 2004 Author Share Posted August 9, 2004 So youre saying you'd rather have a war-mongerer more than an abortionist? I despise both. Then you vote for an independent, so they neither have the power and they have to nego. with other parties, if you give Bush all the power, the world is gonna go to hell, even quicker, you give Kerry all the power, your population rate with go 20 times down the natural rate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qfnol31 Posted August 9, 2004 Share Posted August 9, 2004 At least war isn't all innocent and on the 5 things a Catholic must vote against. Personal preference of what each stands for and who you like best isn't what matters most. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
littleflower+JMJ Posted August 9, 2004 Share Posted August 9, 2004 uh morph? hasn't anyone told you that when it comes to catholics, abortion is the primary issue and not war ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MorphRC Posted August 9, 2004 Author Share Posted August 9, 2004 [quote name='qfnol31' date='Aug 9 2004, 05:17 PM'] At least war isn't all innocent and on the 5 things a Catholic must vote against. Personal preference of what each stands for and who you like best isn't what matters most. [/quote] Well Bush is killing innocent lives thru his wars. And Kerry is killing them before they even see daylight. In my eyes, they are both unworthy of a vote. Therefore Vote for an independent to stop them from having a majority. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now