cmotherofpirl Posted September 9, 2003 Share Posted September 9, 2003 THis is why I recommend the St Ignatius Bible or the Navarre Bible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ironmonk Posted September 9, 2003 Author Share Posted September 9, 2003 THis is why I recommend the St Ignatius Bible or the Navarre Bible. I understand what you mean... but... If it is from the Vulgate, how do we know that something wasn't added in the double translation? I did a search for the word man in NAB and it shows up 924 times, whereas in the Douy-Rhiems it's 3400 times (checked USCCB's site and Unbound.biola.edu) I'll look for the others online where I can search... My point is... is the NAB really inclusive or is the RSV exclusive. If the RSV is translated from the Vulgate, there could be issues with gender because of word endings. My point being is that any bible authorized by the Church does not error... but what is not in error could the lesson to be learned, not necessarily the verbatim details... I think I'll do a little research tonight. Thanks for the article! God Bless! ironmonk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norseman82 Posted September 10, 2003 Share Posted September 10, 2003 Irony.....thread# is 1688....the year King James II - the last Catholic king of England, and grandson of James I for whom the KJV is named - was deposed for his Catholicism. This is a sad occurrance, as James II had baptized his son Catholic and could have brought England back into the Catholic fold. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ironmonk Posted September 10, 2003 Author Share Posted September 10, 2003 (edited) Irony.....thread# is 1688....the year King James II - the last Catholic king of England, and grandson of James I for whom the KJV is named - was deposed for his Catholicism. This is a sad occurrance, as James II had baptized his son Catholic and could have brought England back into the Catholic fold. nm God Bless, ironmonk Edited September 10, 2003 by ironmonk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ironmonk Posted September 10, 2003 Author Share Posted September 10, 2003 Irony.....thread# is 1688....the year King James II - the last Catholic king of England, and grandson of James I for whom the KJV is named - was deposed for his Catholicism. This is a sad occurrance, as James II had baptized his son Catholic and could have brought England back into the Catholic fold. nm God Bless, ironmonk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ironmonk Posted October 2, 2003 Author Share Posted October 2, 2003 Ok... the instructor said my arguement was weak. -ironmonk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anna Posted October 2, 2003 Share Posted October 2, 2003 How much stronger would she like you to spell it out for her? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now