Aloysius Posted July 26, 2004 Share Posted July 26, 2004 bush has stopped US funding of UN population control programs (or you know, baby killing programs), he pushed for and succeeded in illegalizing partial birth abortion, he cut federal funding of stem cell research, he pushed for the Lacy Peterson Law. Kerry's voting record is in favor of federal funding for stem cell research, federal funding for abortion rights, he voted against the Lacy Peterson law because he knew his friends at Planned Parenthood and NARAL would get mad at him for voting for a law that actually recognizes the fetus as a person. Bush is doing things for the pro-life cause. Now, i bet if we had Jeb Bush or Rick Santorem or Alan Keyes in there, there'd be alot more happening, but right now Bush is the best hope for ending abortion. Don't forget the president appoints justices to the supreme court, which may be the best hope to illegalize the American holocaust. According to the Catholic Church, numbers DO count when judging the actions of a government. And let's not forget that Cardinal Ratzinger has said Catholics may have a variety of opinions when it comes to issues like the Iraq war and the death penalty, but abortion is ALWAYS AND EVERYWHERE evil and no Catholic may have a differing opinion when it comes to the fact that it must be illegalized and stopped. JPII disagreed with his decision and timing to go to war. JPII supports his current efforts in Iraq with the handover of power and all the good we're doing over there. Pax Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dUSt Posted July 26, 2004 Share Posted July 26, 2004 [i]"For years, a terrible form of violence has been directed against children who are inches from birth, while the law looked the other way. Today, at last, the American people and our government have confronted the violence and come to the defense of the innocent child. … America stands for liberty, for the pursuit of happiness and for the unalienable right of life. And the most basic duty of government is to defend the life of the innocent. Every person, however frail or vulnerable, has a place and a purpose in this world. Every person has a special dignity. This right to life cannot be granted or denied by government, because it does not come from government, it comes from the Creator of life. … " [b]- George W Bush[/b][/i] While Bush has been president the pro-life campaign has had two major wins: The Partial Birth Abortion Ban and the Unborn Victims of Violence Act. While Senator Kerry has skipped 78 percent of his senate votes this year, he made a point of coming back to vote against the Unborn Victims Of Violence Act. Kerry has voted at least three times against requiring parental consent or notification for a minor's abortion. Kerry says reversing Mexico City Policy would be his first executive order. LARRY KING: "What would be the first executive order?" KERRY: "Reverse the Mexico City policy on the gag rule so that we take a responsible position globally on family planning." (CNN/Los Angeles Times, Democrat Presidential Candidate Debate, Los Angeles, CA, 2/26/04) (The “Mexico City Policy” forbids US tax dollars from being given to organizations in foreign countries that perform abortions or that lobby for legalizing abortion. It was created by President Reagan, abolished by President Clinton, and re-established by President Bush.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Good Friday Posted July 26, 2004 Share Posted July 26, 2004 (edited) May I ask why Iacobus "does not rep the Church"? It is because he doesn't support an evangelical Methodist president? If so, I think we're really beginning to stretch what "repping the Church" really means to the point of absurdity. [b]Edit:[/b] And if in fact he "does not rep the Church" because he doesn't support President Bush, then you better make me "Phishy" too, because I don't support Bush in any way, shape or form -- in fact, I think he is one of the most evil, deceptive men we've seen since Adolph Hitler. And I'm not going to retract that because Her Excellency Judie Brown disagrees with me. Edited July 26, 2004 by Good Friday Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kilroy the Ninja Posted July 26, 2004 Share Posted July 26, 2004 (edited) Iacobus has that title because of multiple posts of his in which his faithfulness to the current magisterium might be called into question. It has nothing to do with his support or non-support of President Bush. May I suggest that in the future you ask such questions via pm to dUSt, the person who hands out said titles? It's far more appropriate. Edited July 26, 2004 by Kilroy the Ninja Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1337 k4th0l1x0r Posted July 26, 2004 Share Posted July 26, 2004 It's hard to get pro-life judges in when the democrats won't even let a vote come up to confirm these judges. Roe v. Wade sure as heck won't get overturned with the type of pro-abortion justices Kerry wants to install. Yeah, Bush hasn't made abortion outright illegal in this country, but look at how much opposition he faces. Catholics supporting abortion and abortion-supporting candidates sure aren't making the pro-life cause any easier. God bless you all, Jay Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Good Friday Posted July 26, 2004 Share Posted July 26, 2004 I'd like to know which one of you removed my last post and for what reason, and how far this censorship is going to go and how many people are going to have to leave before it stops. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dUSt Posted July 26, 2004 Share Posted July 26, 2004 [quote]May I ask why Iacobus "does not rep the Church"? It is because he doesn't support an evangelical Methodist president? [/quote] Of course not. This statement made by Iacobus contradicts Church teaching, as the Church clearly teaches that abortion is more serious than other forms of killing: [i]Again I say, 1. numbers are pointless. Death is death. It doesn't matter who dies or how many SOMEONE DIES.[/i] [quote][b]Edit:[/b] And if in fact he "does not rep the Church" because he doesn't support President Bush, then you better make me "Phishy" too, because I don't support Bush in any way, shape or form -- in fact, I think he is one of the most evil, deceptive men we've seen since Adolph Hitler. And I'm not going to retract that because Her Excellency Judie Brown disagrees with me.[/quote] I don't change titles based on politics, but rather, orthodoxy to the Church. It would be unfair to only give the "Phishy" title to the "ultra-trads" when they seem to deny the teaching authority of our Holy Father, but ignore it when the "liberals" do the same thing. Orthodoxy is a very narrow road. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dUSt Posted July 26, 2004 Share Posted July 26, 2004 [quote name='Good Friday' date='Jul 26 2004, 03:04 PM'] I'd like to know which one of you removed my last post and for what reason, and how far this censorship is going to go and how many people are going to have to leave before it stops. [/quote] Mods: Please either document posts or let the member know in private why certain actions were made. Thanks. Good Friday: Sometimes it's good to wait a little while in case the mod was in the process of letting you know. Just guessing though. Thanks all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Good Friday Posted July 26, 2004 Share Posted July 26, 2004 Cardinal Bernardin taught the same thing that Iacobus said. Are you, a layman, saying that Cardinal Bernardin, a Bishop elevated to the status of a Cardinal by the Holy Father, was heterodox? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kilroy the Ninja Posted July 26, 2004 Share Posted July 26, 2004 [quote name='dUSt' date='Jul 26 2004, 03:08 PM'] Good Friday: Sometimes it's good to wait a little while in case the mod was in the process of letting you know. [/quote] Sorry about that... it was me and I had my son in my lap and I accidently chose the delete button rather than the edit button. And I had to go put him down for his nap, so sorry for the delay. But just so you know, I was going to edit your post as it was a personal attack on dUSt. Because, yes, he is the bishop of phatmass. And the king of phatmass. And the owner of phatmass. And he can give anyone he wants whatever title he wishes. Sorry you can't abide that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1337 k4th0l1x0r Posted July 26, 2004 Share Posted July 26, 2004 Where did Cardinal Bernardin say that it is okay to support pro-abortion legislation? I'm pretty sure that not only was he 'personally' against abortion, but supported legal changes to make sure abortion was outlawed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dUSt Posted July 26, 2004 Share Posted July 26, 2004 [quote name='Good Friday' date='Jul 26 2004, 03:09 PM'] Cardinal Bernardin taught the same thing that Iacobus said. Are you, a layman, saying that Cardinal Bernardin, a Bishop elevated to the status of a Cardinal by the Holy Father, was heterodox? [/quote] Cardinal Bernardin taught that one million abortions were equal to one death as a result of an unjust war? I'd be curious to see this teaching. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Good Friday Posted July 26, 2004 Share Posted July 26, 2004 Cardinal Bernardin taught that life was a "seamless garment," and that one life issue is as great as another. He did not teach the supremacy of abortion among life issues (and neither did the Holy Father in [i]Evangelium Vitae[/i], but those who are so faithful to the magisterium tend to overlook that). That was what Iacobus was saying. He was not supporting pro-choice legislation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dUSt Posted July 26, 2004 Share Posted July 26, 2004 [quote name='Kilroy the Ninja' date='Jul 26 2004, 03:12 PM'] But just so you know, I was going to edit your post as it was a personal attack on dUSt. Because, yes, he is the bishop of phatmass. And the king of phatmass. And the owner of phatmass. And he can give anyone he wants whatever title he wishes. [/quote] Don't worry about deleting personal attacks against me. I have no problem with it. It helps me in my struggle for humility. Seriously. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1337 k4th0l1x0r Posted July 26, 2004 Share Posted July 26, 2004 I think you would find that there really is a difference between issues when it comes to non-grave vs. grave matter. Abortion is ALWAYS a grave sin. War and the death penalty are not always. Yes, you may think the war is un-just, but no one except those on top really know what's going on. I know what's going on as far as abortion is concerned and it is always of grave matter. There is no such thing as a just abortion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts