The Beast Revelation

[ephraim]

The Beast Revelation

This letter is dedicated to all Christians.

The following letter is a summary of Revelation 13. Its purpose is to show the method used in finding the conclusions which have been stated. Nothing new has been added from my previous letters. It is more of a compilation of them all. This writing is the same material in different words. The Bible uses this same method of explanation. There are four Gospels. In each you see a different view of the same material. This can be beneficial because the meaning becomes more exact. Although, if this is a first time reader, then this will all be news to you. With that in mind, here we go.

The first thing that should be addressed when doing any study of Bible prophecy is what questions do I intend to answer. Some of these questions can seem a little simplistic, but their answers are much more complicated. In my studies there were only a few questions that I saw as needing an answer. My questions were very simple. First, who is this individual who is identified by the number 666? Second, who is the false prophet and how does he make the whole world worship the beast whose number is 666. Another question has to do with these same individuals. Could these two individuals be the same person, or for that matter Satan himself? Where is Satan during all this? That last question is very important. It actually goes straight to the answer of all the questions. Finally, when would someone expect to see these individuals on the Earth? Literally, what time frame should I see them? Those are the questions. The answers are much more involved.

This narrative will attempt to show how the answers are figured out. These answers can be seen from events that happen in the nightly news. This leads me to a key, which most of us know, but most of us forget. The Bible is a history book. Some events have happened, while some are waiting to happen. It is the ones that have not happened that we are most concerned with. Here is another key. By the way, these keys I speak of are keys to understanding. The Lord spoke in parables. The reason he gave was that it was for some to know the mysteries of God, while it was for some to know not. In hearing, they do not hear. In seeing, they do not see. I compare it to telling the truth, while hiding it at the same time. Many of the parables that the Lord spoke he immediately gave an answer to. He showed how he used certain symbols and words to describe subjects and then gave their meanings. Now for the punch line. The Lord also spoke in parables that he did not identify. These parables go straight to the hidden meaning of these end times. Another key is word substitution. An example of this is a pretty well-known item from Revelation. This word substitution deals with Revelation 13:1. The beast has seven heads and ten horns. In Revelation 17 those heads and horns are defined. The heads are identified as mountains, while the horns are identified as kings. This changes the whole picture of what the beast is symbolically to what it is literally. Now Rev.13:1 can be read as follows with just the items discussed thus far. And I saw a beast rise up out of the sea having seven mountains and ten kings. That is a simple and easy word substitution. Know that this will happen many times throughout the Bible.

Now, getting back to the questions. The question is, where is Satan? If this question can be answered, you can eliminate some others. Some prophecy teachers believe that Satan is the beast, or that Satan is the false prophet. This interpretation is misleading, and it also creates a stumbling block in the path to a proper interpretation. I almost always get this question. How can you know who the beast is when he cannot be revealed? 2nd Thess. Chapter 2 states that he cannot be revealed, until something is removed first. Most scholars have this part right. That is a picture of the Rapture. What they have wrong is that Satan and the beast are not the same individual. Satan cannot be revealed until after the rapture, but he is not the beast. Therefore, I can identify the beast and his false prophet. People say prove it. So I did. I told them how to understand using the keys that I have mentioned. Revelation 13 is a parable, but God is not giving the definition, or the explanation. This one is for us to figure out. Ok, so where is Satan? In the book of Job, we get a view of Satan's abilities. In one scene, he is discussing with God about Job. Question, where is God? He is in heaven. Also, in his conversation with God Satan is talking as if he knows and has seen Job. God declares that he can do whatever he wants to Job, but he was not allowed to kill him. Now we know something else about Satan. He also has access to the Earth, and can affect peoples lives. So, it appears that Satan can be everywhere he wants to be, on Earth or in heaven. We know Satan and his angels will be cast out of heaven as per Revelation 12. This would further the idea that he is now in heaven. We also see Satan one other time, when he tempted Christ during his time on Earth. It says that he was taken to the wilderness to be tempted of Satan? Most people, and rightly so, have thought the wilderness to be a place on Earth, but this is a parable I believe. The Lord was in the wilderness and was tempted by Satan, but the wilderness is in heaven. This parable is read in Isaiah 35. It is the wilderness and the solitary place where the redeemed of the Lord walk. So, this last item being the most hard to prove, suffice it to say, that when Rev.12 says Satan will be cast out, he must be there in heaven to be cast out. Alright, now we can answer a couple questions. One, Satan is himself, and he is in heaven. Therefore, he is not the beast or the false prophet. These three work together, but each has his own identity.

Now to dissect Revelation 13. As I have already stated, Revelation 13 is a word substitution parable. The seven heads are seven mountains and the ten horns are ten kings. Ok, we know from this description that the beast as described is a group of possibly ten countries. This brings me to another point. There are three definitions for the beast in Revelation 13. The first is a group of countries rising up out of the sea. The second is in Rev.13:11 and is a beast with two horns (kings). Remember horns are kings as per Rev. 17. Finally, there is a beast who is identified by the number 666. It is this last beast that causes all to receive a mark and that no man can buy and sell save he who has the mark, his number, or his name. There are three items here. Nowhere does it say that the mark is the number 666. This might have been a good guess 20 yrs. ago , but it is pretty hard to believe. Imagine people running around with a mark of 666 on their right hands. It sounds like a cartoon, but this is what the prophecy teachers want you to believe. Ok, another problem that sounds like a cartoon is the interpretation of the word "all." They want you to believe that no man could buy or sell if they did not worship the beast and take his mark. Interpreting the word "all" to mean everyone in the world. This is not the case. For one, we know that the beast is made up of only possibly ten countries. Everyone in this world lives in roughly 190 countries. I don't think we could possibly mean everyone. How about, all of those people concerned with the mark. Also, how do you cause all people concerned to receive a mark, and why? The most obvious way to mark everyone is at the voting booth. All people, rich and poor, small and great, or free and bond are potential voters. So, Mahmoud Abbas was elected president of the Palestinian Authority, and in the process all voters received an indelible ink mark on their right hands. This mark was to prevent double voting and corruption in the election. Ok, we have a mark. It is not 666. At this point he fits the part, but not completely. Still, there is no ready identification of 666 concerning him. This election was in January 2005.

Back to Rev.13. We have seven mountains and ten kings. Prophecy teachers want us to believe that a city with seven mountains is the seat of the antichrist and he rules with ten nations. Their logical conclusion was the Europe Union and the Vatican. This started the revived Roman empire theory. This theory has been around since the reformation. It is hard to believe this charade has gone on so long. Teachers are still preaching the Revived Roman Empire. This theory had some validity before the twentieth century and now has to be eliminated. None of these teachers could have predicted the fall of the Ottoman Empire and its division into so many separate sovereign nations. Back to our word substitution. There is an interesting item here concerning the word mountains in scripture. The word mountains can have two meanings. It can be either a mountain range, or a nation. This is the hardest part of this whole exercise, trying to figure out what mountains are describing. Teachers will have you believe it is a city with seven mountains. In actual fact, mountains here are referring to nations. This also pertains to the head wound. The wound was not a literal head wound at all, but was a nation that was wounded. The beast's head or nation was wounded and was healed. This is the Palestinian Authority after the beginning of the Oslo Accords. The land that Israel possessed was now being given back to the Palestinians and the beast's nation is being healed. Ok, so now I have seven nations and ten kings, Rev.13:1. Why do I have three more kings than nations? It seems I have a king for each nation, but three left over. In Daniel in says the beast subdued three kings. These three kings don't necessarily have to be from different countries. It seems so, but is not expressly mentioned. It is another parable. The three kings who were subdued by the beast were Israeli Prime Ministers. These three Prime Ministers all served during the seven years of the Oslo Accords and were voted out of office because of terror perpetrated during Yasser Arafat's rule. Now, I am down to seven nations. These seven nations will wage war. I can easily see seven nations that will wage war here very soon; Syria, Lebanon, Jordan, Egypt, Iran and the Palestinian Authority or Iraq, and there opponent Israel. This is exactly the same beast that is presented in Rev.17:10, just in a slightly different appearance. There are seven kings, five are fallen. This means five kings were defeated in war. Israel is referred to the "one that is," and the one that came later is the Palestinian Authority. This is a description of Israel's war for Independence. Literally, this was the beast being born. The war in 1967 is the beast rising up out of the sea in Rev.13:1. It was the unresolved issues of this conflict that resulted in the Oslo Accords of 1993. This seven year peace treaty was confirmed by Yitzhak Rabin and Yasser Arafat.

Now, there is another beast in Rev.13:11. This beast has two horns or kings. This is a picture of the Palestinian Authority after the elections of January 2006. This is when Hamas ran in the elections and won a majority in parliament. Now the P.A. was a country with two kings. Abbas was the President and Ismail Haniyeh was the Prime Minister. Here is where the problem with money came about. Western Nations did not want to donate money to a known terrorist organization so looked for a way they could still fund Abbas's P.A., but not let any money get to Hamas. This is when the number 666 identified an individual. The temporary international mechanism was adopted on June 16, 2006. This program allowed Western Nations to donate funds directly to Abbas, while bypassing Hamas. If you were a member of Fatah, or on Abbas's payroll you got paid. This is how the people were allowed to buy and sell. They received salaries, whereas before the mechanism, they had no way of getting paid from the Government. Hamas did not receive salaries. Also, Hamas did not receive the mark of the beast. They boycotted the elections for President in Jan. 2005.
It is more obvious who is being talked about the closer you get to the end.

In conclusion, to my three beast definitions. Mahmoud Abbas fits all three definitions. He was a member of the P.A. when it was formed. He took over from Yasser Arafat after his death. He was one of the two kings of the second beast in Rev.13:11. Lastly, he is the one identified by the number 666, which could have been Arafat had he lived.

Now, concerning the false prophet. The following four verses below all refer to the false prophet, Ismail Haniyeh.

Rev.13:11- and I beheld another beast coming up out of the Earth, and he had two horns like a lamb, and he spake as a dragon.
Rev.13:12- And he exercises all the power of the first beast before him, and causes the earth and them which dwell therein, to worship the first beast, whose deadly wound was healed.
Rev.13:13- "And he does great wonders, so that he makes fire come down from heaven on the Earth in the sight of men".
Rev.13:15- And he had power to give life unto the image of the beast, that the image of the beast should both speak, and cause that as many as would not worship the image of the beast, should be killed.

Hamas exercised all the power of the first beast (Abbas's P.A.) because they were now an equal partner in the Government. Also, the leader of Hamas caused them to worship or honor the first beast because Hamas would not honor the first beast. The first beast was the PA without Hamas as a member. The image of the beast is what the Government of Mahmoud Abbas represented. Verse 12 does not mention the image yet, we are just informed that the false prophet caused them to worship the first beast. Verse 14 and 15 gives the details of how that worshipping or honor was to commence. An image was created of the first beast that he (the false prophet) caused to be honored. This image of the beast is three items; the recognition of Israel, the honoring of all prior Palestinian agreements, and a renunciation of terror.

The last question I think that needs addressed is how do you know the timing is right? Meaning, there have been so many translations, how do you know that this one is correct? This is a question I always get asked. The answer, in my mind, is sort of a mix between two different prophecies. The first is the seven day prophecy as recorded in Genesis. It is a similitude between this and the amount of recorded time that has already happened on Earth. In the book of Peter, God says one day to him is as a thousand years. If that idea is applied to the Genesis creation, everyday that God created something one thousand years passed. Finally, on the last day he rested from his work, and his rest was one thousand years or one of God's days. This was one full week or 7000 years. After God's rest he started his work again, and he created Adam. Starting with Adam, it was approximately 4000 years to the time of Christ. Also, we know that Christ was here roughly 2000 years ago. If God was to be consistent with his one week schedule, then we could expect his day of rest to fall somewhere after the year two thousand. 4000 plus 2000 is six days and on the seventh he rested for one thousand years. This is not an exact estimate, but it can put you in the right ballpark when searching for the correct timing of Revelation. This is the estimate. The next item is more exact. Daniel 9:27 says that he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week. Many in Hebrew is Rab. This was a covenant confirmed with Yitzhak Rabin. It was the beginning of land for peace, or the Oslo Accords. When you see this agreement happen you should be aware that this prophecy will last seven years. There is only one problem with this item. Prior to it happening, everyone thought that the end of the seventh year of the agreement God would return and begin his rest. Well, that did not happen. The reason was a logical misinterpretation. It just mentions that this agreement must occur along with the prophecies mentioned, not that they would all happen and end on the last day of the seventh year. This has thrown everyone watching off-course for a time. Although, this was not such a terrible mistake if the watcher could see the right answer and get his, or her perspective back. When you have these two items coinciding at the expected time, then you know Revelation can be interpreted with accuracy. The events should start happening, as they have, as I have recorded in this letter.

May God bless all who read this letter.

Michael

Edited November 10, 2023 by ephraim

[bardegaulois]

Well, this is just the theological version of QAnon... Is JFK Jr involved as well? Or UFOs?

[fides' Jack]

Several major mistakes were made in this analysis.  Some things appear to have truth.  I will address a few points:

On 11/10/2023 at 1:29 PM, ephraim said:

The Bible is a history book.

Not the entire thing.  Much of it is, yes, but some of it is not.  This point is somewhat important.

On 11/10/2023 at 1:29 PM, ephraim said:

Some events have happened, while some are waiting to happen.

True.

On 11/10/2023 at 1:29 PM, ephraim said:

Another key is word substitution.

In interpreting Scripture, this is a very dangerous practice.  Revelation 22:

Quote

For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book:

And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.

Let's leave the words of Scripture as they are, then.  Some of the hidden meaning will likely be changed by word substitution.

On 11/10/2023 at 1:29 PM, ephraim said:

The heads are identified as mountains, while the horns are identified as kings.

Not in my bible.  I read the following (emphasis mine): 

Quote

The seven heads are seven mountains, upon which the woman sitteth: and they are seven kings. [...] And the ten horns which thou sawest are ten kings [...]

It appears the seven heads are both mountains and kings, which seems to indicate both a geographical area as well as 7 different world leaders.  That's actually a fairly common difference between protestants and Catholics.  Protestants tend to pick and choose a specific meaning for any number of different topics of Christian thought, whereas Catholics very often (and correctly) identify that many things have many different meanings, simultaneously.  We recognize truth is often a case of "both, and", rather than "either, or".  

On 11/10/2023 at 1:29 PM, ephraim said:

Most scholars have this part right. That is a picture of the Rapture.

I would not base any of my opinions on protestant scholars.  They get some things right.  The whole idea of the rapture is a very new one, and a very false one.  None of the early Church Fathers spoke of anything like a rapture.  It is based on mainly one phrase found in Scripture, taken wildly out of context.  The Catholic Church has rightly condemned any teaching on the rapture.  The rapture is bad theology, through and through - which explains why it is so popular.  

On 11/10/2023 at 1:29 PM, ephraim said:

What they have wrong is that Satan and the beast are not the same individual.

You might be surprised to learn than you agree with the Catholic Church on this point (which includes all the Church Fathers who spoke of it).  Satan is clearly not the beast.  

But you also get a couple things wrong.  Satan is not a person in the world.  He does not need to be identified as a person.  Likewise, the beast is not an individual.  The beast, as you said, is a group of countries.  The antichrist, who is given power by the beast, is an individual.  

On 11/10/2023 at 1:29 PM, ephraim said:

People say prove it. So I did.

At best you could say you gave your best guess.  Nothing was proven.  Sorry.

On 11/10/2023 at 1:29 PM, ephraim said:

Question, where is God?

Everywhere.  That's the point.

On 11/10/2023 at 1:29 PM, ephraim said:

He also has access to the Earth, and can affect peoples lives.

Clearly that's the case.  Satan has been in hell and on Earth for the entirety of Creation as described in the Bible.  

On 11/10/2023 at 1:29 PM, ephraim said:

So, it appears that Satan can be everywhere he wants to be, on Earth or in heaven

No, this is clearly false, satan cannot ever be in Heaven.  He was banished forever from Heaven.  To say otherwise is a very anti-Christian statement, not just anti-Catholic, but against all that Christianity stands for.

Rather, it is God who is able to speak to whomever He wishes, from wherever they are.  It is God Who is omni-present, not satan.

On 11/10/2023 at 1:29 PM, ephraim said:

We know Satan and his angels will be cast out of heaven as per Revelation 12. This would further the idea that he is now in heaven.

The Bible uses the word "Heaven" to describe two different things.  One is the area of our physical universe which holds the stars.  The other is the spiritual dwelling place of God, which clearly does not reside within our physical universe.  Revelation 12 speaks about stars and the sun and the moon, specifically.  But more importantly, it's explained by the angel in the vision of Revelation that this entire vision is symbolic and not to be taken literally.  To me this specific passage you're alluding to seems to describe (again symbolically) how satan came to be on Earth in the first place, and not a future battle.

On 11/10/2023 at 1:29 PM, ephraim said:

Most people, and rightly so, have thought the wilderness to be a place on Earth, but this is a parable I believe.

This didn't fit the form of any other parable that Christ told.  It's true, and not a parable.

On 11/10/2023 at 1:29 PM, ephraim said:

One, Satan is himself, and he is in heaven.

He is himself, but he is not in heaven.

On 11/10/2023 at 1:29 PM, ephraim said:

Nowhere does it say that the mark is the number 666.

True, and good point.

On 11/10/2023 at 1:29 PM, ephraim said:

Ok, another problem that sounds like a cartoon is the interpretation of the word "all."

"All" is pretty cut and dry.  There aren't many ways to interpret it.  You seem to have interpreted it to mean, basically, "A few".  

On 11/10/2023 at 1:29 PM, ephraim said:

For one, we know that the beast is made up of only possibly ten countries. Everyone in this world lives in roughly 190 countries.

It specifically says the beast, which comes in the form of these ten countries, gives power to the antichrist to rule the entire world, with everyone in it.  That's where the "All" comes into play.  It specifically does not say that only those people in those countries are affected by the power of the antichrist.

On 11/10/2023 at 1:29 PM, ephraim said:

Also, how do you cause all people concerned to receive a mark, and why?

The exact mechanism whereby the mark is utilized remains a future mystery.  The "why" is already indicated; it's a form of control to attempt to force people into apostasy (and thereby lose their souls), by not allowing them to feed themselves (buy or sell).

On 11/10/2023 at 1:29 PM, ephraim said:

So, Mahmoud Abbas was elected president of the Palestinian Authority, and in the process all voters received an indelible ink mark on their right hands

At most this would seem to be a "type" of the mark of the beast.  It could be a precursor, but it was not the mark of the beast in itself.

On 11/10/2023 at 1:29 PM, ephraim said:

The word mountains can have two meanings. It can be either a mountain range, or a nation.

Now we're getting somewhere!

On 11/10/2023 at 1:29 PM, ephraim said:

The wound was not a literal head wound at all, but was a nation that was wounded.

More probably - a leader of a nation.  And it doesn't have to be a literal head wound, but just something that removes this leader from his position of power for a time.

On 11/10/2023 at 1:29 PM, ephraim said:

The land that Israel possessed was now being given back to the Palestinians and the beast's nation is being healed.

That's a pretty big stretch, and ignores several major things, as I already brought up.

On 11/10/2023 at 1:29 PM, ephraim said:

This is when the number 666 identified an individual.

The traditional thought is that the number 666 does identify an individual (namely the antichrist), but it is not clear that it does so directly - and specifically it says it's the number of the beast (of his name), and not the number of the antichrist.  Rather, it's through whatever mechanism that is the mark of the beast that the antichrist subjugates everyone.  But it's specifically the mark of the beast, which we agree is a collection of countries, not the mark of the antichrist.

On 11/10/2023 at 1:29 PM, ephraim said:

It is more obvious who is being talked about the closer you get to the end.

I think this is how it was designed.  But I still think it's unknown.  I don't think you hit the target yet, but you're getting closer.

On 11/10/2023 at 1:29 PM, ephraim said:

This was one full week or 7000 years. After God's rest he started his work again, and he created Adam. Starting with Adam, it was approximately 4000 years to the time of Christ. Also, we know that Christ was here roughly 2000 years ago. If God was to be consistent with his one week schedule, then we could expect his day of rest to fall somewhere after the year two thousand. 4000 plus 2000 is six days and on the seventh he rested for one thousand years.

This is where you really start getting into Catholic theology.  It's not generally accepted by Catholics now, but early Church Fathers shared this view.  St. Irenaeous and St. Justin Martyr both shared this view and used much the same language to describe it.  To them it was fitting that the antichrist should come in the time we're living now, precisely because all of the history of Creation seems to be fitting into the 6-day creation model you've described.  Several passages from Scripture also hint that creation will have a rest day of a thousand years, to follow God's plan.  

You might be interested in reading up on how a number of Church-approved apparitions play into all this.  You mentioned Revelation 12 quite a bit.  Clearly that chapter is referencing Mary giving birth to Jesus.  You might be surprised at how many of the events unfolding before us were prophesied in these apparitions by Mary.  I'd specifically look at Our Lady of Fatima (somewhat ironic given the context of your theories), but several others prophecy the same events.  Our Lady of Fatima is the name given to the woman who appeared to 3 children in the early 1900's.  Some 70,000 people witnessed a miracle in 1917 - something that can't be easily dismissed, even by scientists.  It's worth looking into, and might give you another perspective of all this.

 

Pax.

[MIKolbe]

On 11/10/2023 at 6:28 PM, bardegaulois said:

Well, this is just the theological version of QAnon... Is JFK Jr involved as well? Or UFOs?

Do we get free tin foil hats???

[Norseman82]

Extra incentive to read "AntiChrist and Apocalypse" this Lent.

[ephraim]

Sometimes you just have to wait for prophecy to materialize. It has, and I didn't have to change a word.