fides' Jack's Mega Anti-Vax Thread

[dUSt]

@fides' Jack one week suspension for spamming COVID stuff outside of your special thread.

[ReasonableFaith]

On 10/15/2022 at 6:43 PM, fides' Jack said:

In December of 2020 (as the shots were coming out), Canada had secured 400 million doses, for 37 million people.

Ummm…maybe it’s because Canada is on pace to donate 200,000,000 doses to the international community by the end of 2022?

Maybe it’s also because many of these are pre-orders for future delivery or agreements to have the right to purchase ‘up to’ certain amount of doses in the future with multiple manufacturers?

All the reasons are listed out on the government website for these grifting ‘experts’ to read.

…queue the hand waving and instance that the Canadian government is involved in a deep cover, black ops conspiracy  with 7 different manufactures to bring to fruition the New World Order’s plans for a Great Reset at the behest of the Tri-Lateral Commission.

Geez.

Is Duck Duck Go broken for all these people?  Or are they just trying to milk these antivaxxers and conspiracy theorists for a few more dollars?  Looks like business is good…

 

 

[little2add]

Antivaxers

 

[fides' Jack]

On 10/18/2022 at 7:06 PM, ReasonableFaith said:

Is Duck Duck Go broken for all these people?  Or are they just trying to milk these antivaxxers and conspiracy theorists for a few more dollars?  Looks like business is good…

Ironically, google has gotten more money from me with my anti-covid-shot position than any other entity.  I'm sure "they" haven't gotten anything.

 

[fides' Jack]

On 10/18/2022 at 7:06 PM, ReasonableFaith said:

…queue the hand waving and instance that the Canadian government is involved in a deep cover, black ops conspiracy  with 7 different manufactures to bring to fruition the New World Order’s plans for a Great Reset at the behest of the Tri-Lateral Commission.

Several popes in the last hundred years have confirmed the globalist push, including Pope Francis.  Are they wrong?

[ReasonableFaith]

7 hours ago, fides' Jack said:

Several popes in the last hundred years have confirmed the globalist push, including Pope Francis.  Are they wrong?

Let the hand waving begin!

Geeeez….

[fides' Jack]

On 10/28/2022 at 8:51 PM, ReasonableFaith said:

Let the hand waving begin!

Geeeez….

[Mediator of Meh]Personal attack. -dUSt[/Mediator of Meh]

[fides' Jack]

On 10/28/2022 at 9:26 PM, fides' Jack said:

[Mediator of Meh]Personal attack. -dUSt[/Mediator of Meh]

@dUSt Are you also going to warn those who have made much worse personal attacks against me?

I've been far more reasonable to others on this forum than they have been to me - without repercussion.  Others have judged my intentions negatively time and time again.  

So I'm forced to wonder at this point - do you just "have it in for me"?  Am I being personally targeted?  Are you looking for an excuse to ban me so you don't have to deal with it anymore?  I'm honestly asking.

On 10/28/2022 at 7:51 PM, ReasonableFaith said:

Let the hand waving begin!

Geeeez….

@ReasonableFaith - it is generally acknowledged by many priests and several theologians that I know that the use of "Geez" is taking the name of Our Lord in vain.  The origins of the word come directly from the first half of the name "Jesus".  

-----------------------------------------------------

@moderators and @dUSt: I understand that this forum has rules.  I try to abide by them, unless they are contrary to the truth - I feel a moral obligation to do so as I interact with others here.  Apparently some rules are unwritten, such as rules against spam.  That's fine; if I had a good understanding of what that meant, I could try to abide by that, too.  Some rules are loosely enforced, apparently unless the wrong person appears to cross that line.  Some rules are ambiguous, such as Catholic vs Catholic debate, but I asked the question on that one and was told it has to do with Vatican II deniers (something tells me I stand much closer to @dUSt's stance on this than those who would be seen to break this rule a lot).  But I've brought it up before, and I will say it again: if you are going to censor anyone, or delete their comments, the very first consideration should be instances of taking Our Lord's name in vain.  I believe you would if the actual name were used, or GD or some other seriously grave derivation.  I'd ask that you also consider shortened or lightened versions, such as "geez" or "gosh-darnit" or "oh my gooooodness", or others like that. 

For other things, I can't thank you all enough - I remember some time ago a guy was posting images that were essentially pornography, and it was dealt with pretty quickly.  

Still, I know there have been some complaints made about me behind the scenes (in addition to publicly), and I appreciate that I haven't been just outright shut down.  On other websites, I would have been banned long ago.  So, final question: I've now had 2 warnings in the space of about a month (1 including a 1-week suspension of commenting ability).  Is there a specific number of warnings that one can get before he's just banned altogether?  Like 3 in a month or something?

[fides' Jack]

In trying not to "spam", I'm using this thread.  The far-left Atlantic recently published an article regarding mistakes made during covid:

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2022/10/covid-response-forgiveness/671879/

It admits the mask mandates were a mistake.  It admits shutting schools down was a mistake.  

The article is essentially a call to "forgive and forget" without really admitting the fault.  It's making the rounds on all the conservative shows and news sources.  

I've seen 2 reactions to this - the first is a sound rejection and call for justice for all involved.  The other is simply giving in and gloating about being right, which is something the article called out, anyway.  

My first reaction was "gibbets and crows".  If the issue were a lighter one, I'll be honest, I'd be tempted to do some gloating too, but this is not a time for "I told you so".  It's also not a time for vengeance-seeking.  Some people must be brought to justice.  Fauci very clearly committed grave crimes, lied under oath, lied to the media, manipulated the government, doubled his net worth, etc...  But not everyone who was wrong is guilty.  I - and my family including young children - was personally persecuted many times in small ways, but only by those who didn't know better.  I fared much better than millions of others who shared my convictions.  I thank God I was not tested to that extent.

If we really look at the main cause of all this chaos, we have to admit that all of us, including myself, are responsible.  This is a result of our sinfulness and refusal to live morally-ordered Christian lives.  I am just as guilty as anyone.  Several months ago, I saw that this was starting to happen, and that people were starting to wake up to see just how serious all of this is.  (I'm sure that thread got mixed up somewhere in this one.)  At the time I called for peace and forgiveness, also, from those who have trusted the authorities and been injured from the covid shots.  I take the same stance with these issues.  Let's forgive those who ask for forgiveness.  Let's show mercy to those who seek it.  It's true that a grave evil has been done, that millions of people lost their lives, millions more had their lives ruined.  But regardless of what stance you took, we are all to blame. 

"Forgive us our trespasses as we forgive those who trespass against us"

[dUSt]

17 hours ago, fides' Jack said:

@dUSt Are you also going to warn those who have made much worse personal attacks against me?

Worry about yourself.

17 hours ago, fides' Jack said:

  I'd ask that you also consider shortened or lightened versions, such as "geez" or "gosh-darnit" or "oh my gooooodness", or others like that. 

Naw.

[fides' Jack]

2 hours ago, dUSt said:

Worry about yourself.

Naw.

[fides' Jack]

20 hours ago, fides' Jack said:

I'd ask that you also consider shortened or lightened versions, such as "geez" or "gosh-darnit" or "oh my gooooodness", or others like that. 

I did not notice that a fiddler had changed what I wrote.  I just quoted the abbreviated version of "o-m-g-" so it seems it's already being taken into account for that one.  Thanks, Phatmass!

I'd much rather be told "Naw" and still adhere to my request than to be told "Sure thing!" and have my request be ignored.  

[fides' Jack]

 

[fides' Jack]

 

 

[little2add]

Vaccinated people now make majority of COVID deaths in US: Report

For the first time since the beginning of the pandemic in early 2020, a majority of Americans dying from Covid were at least partially vaccinated, according to the new analysis of federal and state data.

In a startling revelation, a Washington Post analysis has found that more vaccinated people are now dying of the Covid disease and 58 per cent of coronavirus deaths in August in the US "were people who were vaccinated or boosted".

For the first time since the beginning of the pandemic in early 2020, a majority of Americans dying from Covid were at least partially vaccinated, according to the new analysis of federal and state data.

"We can no longer say this is a pandemic of the unvaccinated," said Kaiser Family Foundation vice president Cynthia Cox, who conducted the analysis on behalf of the Washington Post.