Peace Posted October 27, 2020 Share Posted October 27, 2020 11 minutes ago, Ash Wednesday said: Not sexist at all. Definitely they had to be really careful about not being too hostile to her. Possibly also this being just before the election as well. She wouldn't have had any accusations about misconduct with men. Maybe she's not much of a beer drinker either. Having 2 black kids also made the racism card a bit difficult to pull out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Didacus Posted October 27, 2020 Share Posted October 27, 2020 23 minutes ago, Ash Wednesday said: Not sexist at all. Definitely they had to be really careful about not being too hostile to her. Possibly also this being just before the election as well. She wouldn't have had any accusations about misconduct with men. Maybe she's not much of a beer drinker either. Based on that theory the whole supreme court will soon be 100% women in one more turn around. I can tell you that if you offered me a job with the condition of going through what Kavanah and family went through I would not even take the interview. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rachael Posted October 27, 2020 Share Posted October 27, 2020 (edited) 15 minutes ago, Peace said: Having 2 black kids also made the racism card a bit difficult to pull out. Isn't that the same line of argument as "I'm not racist! I've got black friends!"? You can have children from any race and still be racist. Edited October 27, 2020 by rachael word Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Didacus Posted October 27, 2020 Share Posted October 27, 2020 13 minutes ago, Peace said: Having 2 black kids also made the racism card a bit difficult to pull out. Case in point... because of politics the supreme court will soon be accessible only to certain criterium.... These criterium will be considerations outside of qualifications or integrity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peace Posted October 27, 2020 Share Posted October 27, 2020 12 minutes ago, rachael said: You can have children from any race and still be racist. Anything is possible, but it's a helluva lot less likely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lilllabettt Posted October 27, 2020 Share Posted October 27, 2020 (edited) 58 minutes ago, rachael said: Isn't that the same line of argument as "I'm not racist! I've got black friends!"? You can have children from any race and still be racist. Actually the black adoptees were a liability to her appointment not a shield. The left is suspicious of adoption in general and the far left is absolutely VICIOUS to transracial adoptive families. I believe some publicly tried to make an issue of it with ACB's children, called her a colonizer and wanting to investigate whether the adoption was "ethically legitimate." You all are naive if you think her opposition didn't look into it. Sorry meant to respond to you @Peace Edited October 27, 2020 by Lilllabettt Tag Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Didacus Posted October 27, 2020 Share Posted October 27, 2020 (edited) 4 minutes ago, Lilllabettt said: Actually the black adoptees were a liability to her appointment not a shield. The left is suspicious of adoption in general and the far left is absolutely VICIOUS to transracial adoptive families. I believe some publicly tried to make an issue of it with ACB's children, called her a colonizer and wanting to investigate whether the adoption was "ethically legitimate." You all are naive if you think her opposition didn't look into it. Sorry meant to respond to you @Peace Seriously? I... am... speechless... And now if Biden wins Harris will become president and the court packing begins! And I actually thought Trudeau was bad.... Edited October 27, 2020 by Didacus Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ash Wednesday Posted October 27, 2020 Author Share Posted October 27, 2020 Oh yeah people accused Barrett of having the "white savior complex" -- as opposed to adopting those children out of the goodness of one's heart. It was a pretty weak thing to try to pin on her and didn't have much weight, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peace Posted October 27, 2020 Share Posted October 27, 2020 (edited) 7 minutes ago, Lilllabettt said: Actually the black adoptees were a liability to her appointment not a shield. The left is suspicious of adoption in general and the far left is absolutely VICIOUS to transracial adoptive families. I believe some publicly tried to make an issue of it with ACB's children, called her a colonizer and wanting to investigate whether the adoption was "ethically legitimate." You all are naive if you think her opposition didn't look into it. Sorry meant to respond to you @Peace I noticed all of that, but it backfired big time I think. That whole "she is a colonizer" bit was real crank stuff. The accusations and her reaction to it made her seem more relatable, I think. I am guessing this is how a lot black people viewed those accusations: Edited October 27, 2020 by Peace Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fides' Jack Posted October 27, 2020 Share Posted October 27, 2020 (edited) Nevermind. Edited October 27, 2020 by fides' Jack Probably shouldn't share all of that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rachael Posted October 28, 2020 Share Posted October 28, 2020 Yikes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now