Mediators of Meh needed on this site

[Guest]

1 minute ago, Lilllabettt said:

Have you messaged Dust. If not I'll do it

No I messaged a couple other Mediators of Meh.

6 minutes ago, weareacouple said:

I wasn't on here yesterday, however it could have been my wife. I have not messaged anyone. I am not sure how you were freaked out.

I have no idea if you're a real account and your story is real. But you literally had naked porn up as your profile picture all night. And wrote some disturbing sexually charged stuff on a Catholic forum with young people reading it. And said you know people here and go to Church with them. Yet won't say who they are or what your old account was ect Whoever you are sincere prayers. God loves you. Get help.

[Lilllabettt]

37 minutes ago, Delivery said:

No I messaged a couple other Mediators of Meh.

I messaged him here and on FB. Stay tuned.

[Guest]

38 minutes ago, Lilllabettt said:

I messaged him here and on FB. Stay tuned.

Cool. I think a good strategy moving forward would be to allow people like yourself and others to have at least minimum Mediator of Meh capabilities. So they could protect eyes from the really explicit stuff when it happens. There's no reason with the amount of decent trusted posters here......that posts like these should be up for this long.

Edited August 15, 2020 by Guest

[dUSt]

Delivery, you are mean to me.

I marked the nudist as a spammer, so the profile and posts are gone.

[little2add]

2 hours ago, Delivery said:

There's no reason with the amount of decent trusted posters here......that posts like these should be up for this long.

 

[Anastasia]

When I was studying book design the students were told not to start drawing until they answered certain questions about the purpose of a book, its audience etc. We also were taught to verify our every step with a question “what for?”, like “I want to use here the green font - what for?”. The moderators cannot always clear the debris so I think this approach could be useful for all. If a question “what for?” regarding the exhibitionists here was applied the answers would cease immediately after their initial input re: catholic objection to public nudity was answered (by the way it is pity that thread gone because there were good serious answers). If someone exposes his private parts in the street it is obvious “what for” he is doing that and the forum is just such a street the answer to “what for” is quite obvious. The more attention and anger - the more excitement the exhibitionist/a public masturbator (physical or spiritual or both) gets.

[Guest]

11 hours ago, dUSt said:

Delivery, you are mean to me.

I marked the nudist as a spammer, so the profile and posts are gone.

Yo apologies for being mean. Not intentional. I need Confession. Haven't been there since January. The nudist was legit freaking me out. You should of seen the x rated profile photo along with saying he knows people here ect along with the graphic posts. Glad you handled it. Take care.

[little2add]

 

Maybe the “report post” tab could be improved.  I have used it on occasion and felt it was to vague.  

• The first and only question “why do you want to report this?” Is automatically answered that “the comment is okay, but i want to tell the moderator about it”

What if it’s not OK, It’s simple notification does not address the issue or objections to the post.

• the Optionally Message...

again, the issue or objections to the poster post, in my opinion, be detailed.    Making the Message “optional” Discourages Input 

• lastly could Could there be some sort of tab or indicator on the objectionable post, numbering when and if the report post tab has been used, and make it anonymously.   

Sincerely, L2A 

 

Edited August 16, 2020 by little2add