popestpiusx Posted July 1, 2004 Share Posted July 1, 2004 [quote name='Archbishop 10-K' date='Jul 1 2004, 12:42 AM'] For a "lesser of two evils" scenario, here's an example. George W. Bush vs. Adolf Hitler Both are bad, but one is worse than the other. The race is almost 50/50. There's no telling who's going to win. Would you vote? [/quote] I would vote, but would not be bound to vote for Bush (and Hitler did not commit the atrocities until several years after he was legitimately elected.) Perhaps I would write in the Kaiser, or a Hapsburg. In any case it is irrelevant as these two are not in a race. I must vote for the best candidate (even if the best is not actually running this time around ). What other people do is not my problem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crusader1234 Posted July 1, 2004 Share Posted July 1, 2004 Go Hapsburgs. They were good Catholics with their heads screwed on properly, too pad the screws werent strong enough to stop the guillotine in some cases Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ellenita Posted July 2, 2004 Share Posted July 2, 2004 [quote]I hope you don't change your view of me[/quote] No chance! We're Phamily..... [quote]I'm one of those rare things, a 21 year-old Tory... [/quote] And I'm even rarer...I can remember a time when there was a difference between 'right' and 'left'!! :crackup: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now