little2add Posted February 11, 2019 Share Posted February 11, 2019 Is an infant, marked for abortion but delivered alive, even in tragic circumstances, a person whom the law ought to protect? In Roe vs way, the Supreme Court invalidated Texas’s century-old abortion statute (which had allowed abortion only if a mother’s life was threatened by continued pregnancy). When coupled with a companion holding in Doe v. Bolton, decided the same day, the court’s new jurisprudence allowed abortion at any time during pregnancy “if a physician deemed it necessary to preserve a woman’s health” understood “in light of all factors—physical, emotional, psychological, familial, and the woman’s age.” Doe’s broad health exception served to unravel any meaningful categorical gestational limits on abortion in state law. so how is the woman (mother’s) health in any danger if it ( the baby) survives the abortion performed just prior to natural birth? https://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2019/02/49302/ 4 hours ago, Ash Wednesday said: Yeah well nobody's answered my questions. Like usual. Now there is Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
little2add Posted February 11, 2019 Author Share Posted February 11, 2019 (edited) The In Roe v. Wade the Court said; during the third trimester, the state may regulate or prohibit abortion to promote its interest in the potential life of the fetus, except where abortion is necessary to preserve the woman's life or health. Furthermore, the Second and third trimester abortion must be decided by the mother’s doctor and the woman (mother) New York State’s new abortion ruling allows the abortion to be performed by a non-doctor. This new rule violates the roe vs. wade third trimester regulation for a medical doctors involvement in determining the vialbilty of the pre-born human being Therefore this New York State new law, according to Roe v. Wade is unconstitutional Edited February 11, 2019 by little2add Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
little2add Posted February 12, 2019 Author Share Posted February 12, 2019 There were two victims in the horrific attack earlier this month on Jennifer Irigoyen in New York City. But the state’s law recognizes only one of them. Anthony Hobson allegedly dragged his former girlfriend into the stairwell of her Queens apartment building and stabbed her in the stomach, neck and torso. Irigoyen was in the second trimester of her pregnancy. Neither she nor her unborn child survived. this unborn child is or was A viable human being https://nypost.com/2019/02/11/new-yorks-blessing-on-infanticide/?fbclid=IwAR3ZZgOxcAfHL0aykbXSqJe9a4bx8CVojnoTWMzGShvgxu8Gn6CkDuFtMK8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Didacus Posted August 21, 2019 Share Posted August 21, 2019 Not sure about the differences, but there are certainly pertinent similarities. Both end a human life. Both attack an innocent life. Both attack the most vulnerable, who cannot speak for themselves (assuming very young children). It is a frightfully small step down the slope from abortion to infenticide. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now