Jump to content
An Old School Catholic Message Board

Fr. Euteneuer Vs. Nancy Pelosi


Dave

Recommended Posts

[quote name='MorphRC' date='Jul 2 2004, 01:08 AM'] I agree. Violence is always the answer..... :blink: [/quote]
:rotfl:

I didn't mean literally!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Dave' date='Jul 2 2004, 04:19 AM'] :rotfl:

I didn't mean literally! [/quote]
Avicenna did... he talked about those who denied the law of non contradiction should be beaten.
"Anyone who denies the law of non-contradiction should be beaten and burned until he admits that to be beaten is not the same as not to be beaten, and to be burned is not the same as not to be burned."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ThyWillBeDone

I think it about time someone wrote a letter like that to her. It is a shame it probably didn't effect her at all
God Bless,
Chris

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ClaireBear

I disagree with the statement above. Fr. Euteneuer's letter was NOT mean spirited, it was the truth. When someone is in a position of political power like Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), she has an amazing opportunity to both stick up for her faith and defend what's morally right, or to ignore it completely. Pelosi calls herself Catholic- yet she is pro-choice (and supports homosexual marriage). Not only is this a complete contradiction to our Church’s teachings, but if we, as Catholics, sit by silently and just watch this happen, people around the country are going to get a false impression of what the Catholic Church believes. [b]Showing compassion as an exception to moral norms is not showing compassion at all.[/b] Chrysologus, would you agree that it is the job of our bishops and priests to defend our faith, to uphold Christ’s teachings? Or should they just sit by and watch as people as Pelosi literally throw their faith out the window, without saying a word? “Don’t repay evil for evil-” how is speaking the Truth evil? I think one thing that’s key to remember here is that there is such a thing as righteous anger- and I think defending the unborn is certainly righteous. You have a great point by thinking that being too harsh on someone is not going to make them change their ways, or attract them to Chirst- but at the same time, there [i]is[/i] a time and a place to really take a stand defend what's right, and personally I believe this was an awesome example.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...