Jump to content
An Old School Catholic Message Board

"Every Naked Person I See Turns Me On"


Guest

Recommended Posts

44 minutes ago, Jack4 said:

I'll play with the snow! 

For about five minutes, then any exposed skin literally starts to freeze. :) 

14 minutes ago, Amppax said:

This thread got weird. 

Got?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Nihil Obstat said:

For about five minutes, then any exposed skin literally starts to freeze. :) 

Pardon the pun, isn't that cool?!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Calling that pornography is rather offensive. Edit and warn as necessary, but I highly object to classifying it as porn. Puritans on this site, dude...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Nihil Obstat said:

Calling that pornography is rather offensive. Edit and warn as necessary, but I highly object to classifying it as porn. Puritans on this site, dude...

Not criticising the warning. It is just not porn.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the notion that women are judged by their outer appearance rather than character, ability and competencies is pornographic  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Nihil Obstat said:

Calling that pornography is rather offensive. Edit and warn as necessary, but I highly object to classifying it as porn. Puritans on this site, dude...

I called it classy porn.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was referring  to the so-called nude art work that was posted here.  

See:

A million props for that. In exchange, my favourite painting ever, Chloe, by Jules Joseph Lefebvre:

Edited: Classy pornography. - dUSt

 

- As if, you didn't understand

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, dUSt said:

I called it classy porn.

I noticed. It is classy, it is not porn. Pornography is inherently evil. What I posted was art. Nude portrait art in the academic tradition. If that is against the rules then fine, I do not mind the warning and it is your prerogative. It is not pornography. I do mind being accused of posting pornography. There is no coherent definition of pornography that that painting falls under.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Nihil Obstat said:

I noticed. It is classy, it is not porn. Pornography is inherently evil. What I posted was art. Nude portrait art in the academic tradition. If that is against the rules then fine, I do not mind the warning and it is your prerogative. It is not pornography. I do mind being accused of posting pornography. There is no coherent definition of pornography that that painting falls under.

"Classy porn" in and of itself is an oxymoron and carried a touch of levity in the context used  

The problem with your post was that it was gratuitous nudity outside the context of a serious art conversation in a media and conversation where it may not be interpreted properly by all age groups or potential viewers.    You know the title and first meme was a double entendre to tease at being salacious.  Not a major offense, but worth editing by some opinion.  You may disagree, but you don't seem to think dUSt was completely unreasonable.   No need to feel besmirched. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Anomaly said:

"Classy porn" in and of itself is an oxymoron and carried a touch of levity in the context used  

The problem with your post was that it was gratuitous nudity outside the context of a serious art conversation in a media and conversation where it may not be interpreted properly by all age groups or potential viewers.    You know the title and first meme was a double entendre to tease at being salacious.  Not a major offense, but worth editing by some opinion.  You may disagree, but you don't seem to think dUSt was completely unreasonable.   No need to feel besmirched. 

As I said, I do not care about the warning. My one and only concern is calling it pornography. If the word pornography is removed then I am perfectly content.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

HisChildForever

I suppose one could say it appears a bit pornographic, but is not pornography. That is, a sensual photo or art piece is not pornography per se but the intentions of the person or persons depicted, the photographer, and/or the artist are not entirely "innocent" either. Someone who creates a nude piece is bringing attention to the bare human body, and is likely attempting to elicit a number of things from the viewer, such as awe, sensuality, appreciation of natural beauty, etc. Out of curiosity, are there nude male artworks transformed into shower curtains too? (I am quite happy with my beach-themed curtain, make no mistake!)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...