Guest Posted April 4, 2016 Share Posted April 4, 2016 (edited) I went to Confession yesterday and took Communion today. A Catholic "friend" on Facebook is implying that I shouldn't be receiving in the hand. Usually I never receive Communion so this isn't an issue. Although when I do is receiving in the hand not alright? This girl basically told me I need to look at the history on this and that I'm not showing reverence to God. Edited April 4, 2016 by Guest Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gabriela Posted April 4, 2016 Share Posted April 4, 2016 (edited) 41 minutes ago, Josh said: I went to Confession yesterday and took Communion today. A Catholic "friend" on Facebook is implying that I shouldn't be receiving in the hand. Usually I never receive Communion so this isn't an issue. Although when I do is receiving in the hand not alright? This girl basically told me I need to look at the history on this and that I'm not showing reverence to God. Many traditional Catholics are against receiving Communion in the hand because, traditionally, only the hands of the priest were to touch the consecrated host. However, today it is permissible to receive in the hand, so you're fine. If you WISH to receive on the tongue because you feel that it would show more reverence to God, then I encourage you to do that. I receive kneeling and on the tongue because I feel it is more respectful. Do your hands ever do terrible things? If so, maybe those hands shouldn't touch Him. I know awful things come out of my mouth, so I probably shouldn't put Him there. But how else am I to get better if I don't? The least I can do, I figure, is avoid touching Him with my sinful hands. (Then again, I'm sure a priest's hands aren't sinless, but at least at the Mass, I should think, the priest receives the grace of not "transferring" that to the Host, because he is acting in the person of Christ during Mass.) Still, as I said, it is permitted, so don't fret about it. Just pray over which way is best for you, and do that. Also, Josh, if you struggle very much with sin, then I would encourage you to receive Communion as much as possible, rather than "usually never". Only after confession if that is needed, of course. But still, receiving Our Lord can give you the strength and grace to resist sin, so you should not avoid it if you are free of mortal sin. Edited April 4, 2016 by Gabriela Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spem in alium Posted April 4, 2016 Share Posted April 4, 2016 When I was researching in Rome, we would have Mass in the convent chapel every day. We all received the Eucharist by intinction. Until then, I had never received Communion on the tongue and was a bit wary of doing so because of my facial paralysis. I actually really found it meaningful receiving Jesus this way, though receiving on the hand is easier for me - and, I think, for the priest. Mass at the convent would be said by a chaplain who, at the beginning, acted very hesitant to give me Communion on the tongue, but by the end of my time there it was okay. Ultimately, you should receive Holy Communion in the way in which you can, with the greatest of your ability, give reverence and glory to God. For me, it's making a deep bow and receiving on the hand. I feel like I am giving God glory without making people uncomfortable. For others, it may be receiving on the tongue while kneeling. It ultimately depends on you and God. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted April 4, 2016 Share Posted April 4, 2016 (edited) Thanks for the replies. I thought going to Confession first was the most important thing and making sure with absolute certainty I was in a state of grace. In the hand is how I've always received since First Communion. Although this girl is making assumptions that I think "Jesus is a taco (so tasty) (so tasty) (so tasty). Not the case. I was just always taught to receive in the hand. I didn't realize this angered God and showed him a lack of reverence. Edited April 4, 2016 by Guest Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nihil Obstat Posted April 4, 2016 Share Posted April 4, 2016 Pray about it, Josh. I can see this thread deteriorating if I get involved, so I will not. But do pray about this, and seek guidance from holy priests. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted April 4, 2016 Share Posted April 4, 2016 28 minutes ago, Nihil Obstat said: Pray about it, Josh. I can see this thread deteriorating if I get involved, so I will not. But do pray about this, and seek guidance from holy priests. I don't see why it has to deteriorate. I'm not looking for an argument. I'm not opposed to receiving on the tongue. I just never have before. I didn't realize it was such a big deal. I thought you are either in a state of grace or you're not and that's what it boiled down to. I didn't realize I had Catholics judging me and my reverence towards God because I don't receive on the tongue or kneel. I also wasn't aware this angered them. I use the word anger literally. Since this is the case I would like to know how I should proceed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ash Wednesday Posted April 4, 2016 Share Posted April 4, 2016 Josh, nobody has the right to judge you about whether you receive communion on the tongue or not. Communion in the hand is allowed, so it's not right for someone else to tell you that you can't receive that way. Threads like this often deteriorate simply because people just have strong opinions about the matter and it can become a touchy subject. The same goes for things like wearing veils, what clothing are appropriate for mass, what music is appropriate, et cetera. For me, personally -- I do receive on the tongue most of the time because it puts me in a reverent frame of mind. The recent exception being that there was a priest where husband and I used to occasionally attend mass and he'd get really grumpy and throw such a stink about germs and not wanting to distribute communion on the tongue, I would receive by the hand when I had to receive from him because I didn't want to deal with him getting so upset and flustered about it. If someone says a specific practice is preferred, keep in mind they are evaluating the practice and way of receiving communion itself, not the person doing it. Or at least, that's how it should be. Nobody can judge you on the matter. If someone criticizes the practice itself, I wouldn't take it personally. At the end of the day, things like this are individual decisions that should be made prayerfully, and everyone will have their viewpoints about it -- but at the end of the day the decision is yours alone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Not A Real Name Posted April 4, 2016 Share Posted April 4, 2016 For me after seeing youtube videos with unconsecrated hosts being placed on a gloved hand and then removed, and seeing the particles left behind, I will never ever do communion in the hand. The document allowing communion in the hand I believe states it is only allowed if there is no risk of the Eucharist particles falling to the ground. I have not seen where this can be possible in the OF liturgy unless the parishioners lick their hands clean under a paten before leaving, which they dont. I'm sure particles of the Eucharist (which even a particle is the entire person of Christ) have fallen to the ground, been stepped on, brushed off on clothing, or Lord knows what else. IMO, communion in the hand just needs to stop. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
little2add Posted April 4, 2016 Share Posted April 4, 2016 hands or on the tongue are both right, personally i prefer the pre-vatican way but I'm very old school Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nihil Obstat Posted April 4, 2016 Share Posted April 4, 2016 7 hours ago, Ash Wednesday said: At the end of the day, things like this are individual decisions that should be made prayerfully, and everyone will have their viewpoints about it -- but at the end of the day the decision is yours alone. Mostly, but not entirely. While it is uncommon, it is well within a priest's right to refuse to distribute in the hand, and bishops are permitted to forbid it in their diocese. As far as I know there is one diocese which has done so. The inverse is not true; communion on the tongue cannot be legally prohibited for any reason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KnightofChrist Posted April 4, 2016 Share Posted April 4, 2016 (edited) Bishop Athanasius Schneider on the history of communion in the hand and why the Church traditionally prefers communion on the tongue. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jii6NCfTW68 Edited April 4, 2016 by KnightofChrist Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gabriela Posted April 4, 2016 Share Posted April 4, 2016 2 hours ago, KnightofChrist said: Bishop Athanasius Schneider on the history of communion in the hand and why the Church traditionally prefers communion on the tongue. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jii6NCfTW68 That was such a great video. I think I'm going to watch all his interviews now. I hadn't seen any before. He's a very lovable person. Thanks, KoC! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NadaTeTurbe Posted April 4, 2016 Share Posted April 4, 2016 This is your individual decision. I receive on the hands because for me it's more respectfull than sticking out the tongue, plus I've never seen it done in my parish. I've taken it on the tongue in Spain, because everbody took it kneeling and on the tongue and I did not want to make myself seen. Anyway, in the moment of the communion, we all should be focusing on our communion and praying about it, and not watching how other people take communion. I used to do this a lot - not watching other people taking communion, but just watching them and thinking "nice dress... cute baby...". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nihil Obstat Posted April 4, 2016 Share Posted April 4, 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nihil Obstat Posted April 4, 2016 Share Posted April 4, 2016 BIshop Schneider had been in Vancouver just over the summer to give a talk to their Una Voce chapter. We had looked into flying him to Calgary immediately afterwards for the same thing, but unfortunately it did not quite work out. He is an incredible person. In my opinion he is one of the best bishops we have in the entire Church. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now