Trump Banning Muslims

[dominicansoul]

It certaintly will be entertaining...

[Ash Wednesday]

1 hour ago, KnightofChrist said:

I wouldn't be shocked at all, he has the kinds of large crowds Obama had when he was running the first time, and like Obama his critics are unable to stop him. Heck I think it's likely we'll hear "President Donald J. Trump", but I don't know the future if I did I wouldn't be working where I'm at now lol.

Well, maybe I'll hit you up for some lottery numbers. :D

I guess anything is possible. Idiocracy: most prophetic movie ever. 

[Guest]

[Guest]

42 minutes ago, Josh said:

This issue is tough. I keep finding myself being pulled in both directions. From a Christian on Facebook to this picture "By the way those Muslims who died defending our country I'm sure share the ideals of our country. Muslims who adhere to the Koran will do all they can to kill and murder us. God doesn't ask us to invite those wolves into our homes."

"I'm trying real hard not to be bigoted, racist, Islamophobic and all that, but there is a video going around in which American Muslims express their feelings about being Muslim in America right now and they all say they feel frightened, sad, angry, hurt etc. But none of them said they were angry, sad, hurt and frustrated with their fellow Muslims who are terrorists.This seems odd to me. When I see Christians like Westboro Baptists or Irish Republican Army bombers or a Christian who is anti Semitic or shoots up an abortion mill in the name of their religion I don't get angry, sad, hurt and frightened at their victims. I get angry, hurt, sad and frustrated at my fellow "Christians" who are so stupid and paranoid and insane that they use violence in the name of Christ.Surely if these good Muslim neighbors on this video are patriotic Americans and are frightened, sad, frustrated and angry they should be expressing those emotions about their fellow religionists who (we are told) are a lunatic minority of Muslims and whose actions are totally contrary to the religion of peace, and are attacking their homeland of the USA. Or am I missing something?"

Edited December 8, 2015 by Guest

[StMichael]

It is not the content of what he said but the way he says that gives knee jerk reactions.

Firstly, the US Governments first duty is to its citizens, not anyone else. 

Secondly, these are not refugees, they are migrants. 

Thirdly, never in the history of the US have so many "immigrants" been allowed into the US, legally and illegally. Congress would hold off ten years to allow those they did let in to assimilate. Never in our history has this happened or been allowed.

Lastly, there is no way to provide this country with any form of safety as these migrants cannot be accounted for. 

And I would also say, where was our President when middle east Christian genocide was taking place? Those people are true refugees, not the masses who are seeking to infiltrate and/ or feed off the host nations.

I can tell you this, no, not all muslims are bad, but all the bad we are experiencing worldwide is coming from this ideology. Every faith that exists today has gone through some form of reformation. islam is still a 7th century belief that adhered to calls for everything we are seeing.

[Guest]

5 hours ago, foundsheep said:

Catechism of the Catholic Church #2106:
"Nobody may be forced to act against his convictions, nor is anyone to be restrained from acting in accordance with his conscience in religious matters in private or in public, alone or in association with others, within due limits." This right is based on the very nature of the human person, whose dignity enables him freely to assent to the divine truth which transcends the temporal order. For this reason it "continues to exist even in those who do not live up to their obligation of seeking the truth and adhering to it."

Found Sheep hope you're well. Can you explain this a little further?

[Tab'le De'Bah-Rye]

Even our Bible says that ishmael will rule with a sword, these are Gods direct prophecy over the line of ishamel. Why the shock? The world is far from God and going back to pagansim why would ishmael not try and subdue the enemy with a sword? Though i suspect these poor muslims, and like your st thomas banner says, these are all poor men, where are they getting there funding? Who is scared of God? Satan!

Not saying i agree with muslims demanding shiite law in other nations but in there own nations this is fine, and perhaps the sword that God talks of is the sword of Truth and is a word thing and not a weapon thing at all and scripture has been mis interpreted.

I dont believe in convert or die but also dont believe any philosophy should be banned no matter how corrupt or misled, i believe in freedom, though i too believe that some things definitely need to be illegal but a philosophy is not one of them, heck your nation allows satanism to be an official religion which actually has gathering places to hold there dark masses. But there not killing anyone! How sure are you of that? The New world order will attempt to suppress, water down or ban any group whether religious or not that stands against there ideals in any way, shape or form, live and let live will mean ' silence is a virtue'. Praying, free counselling and Protesting outside abortion clinics in my state in australia was just made illegal a few days ago.

The NWO will also murder and go to war to get what they want. Supposedly some illuminati free masons that are in the lime light have been murdered when attempting to leave the cult and preparing to expose the realities of the satanic guild. And we may say we know what there doing its all on you tube and even they openly say what they do, i guarentee you dont even here the half of it, they are still very much a secret society, better believe dat yo.

Edited December 9, 2015 by Tab'le De'Bah-Rye

[Tab'le De'Bah-Rye]

And the only way to defeat them is with prayer,mediation,following the way to the best of your knowledge and understanding of what that is, fervent worthy participation in the holy mass and the blessed sacraments etc etc. And winning as many souls as you can with the grace of God before you die. And primarily loving others, being charitable, and seeking those that are open to the truth and harvesting there hearts for the LORD! And not slothful about all this thinking that the mission is just going to descend from the sky and say " hey hey hey lets go get em." because He already did, now lets get to it huh.

you will meet opposition but love your enemies and pray for them

Edited December 9, 2015 by Tab'le De'Bah-Rye

[Tab'le De'Bah-Rye]

Oh this indeed is a holy war and it can not be faught with materialistic weapons of mass destruction it needs to be faught with weapons of the Spirit, and this war has been waging for over 2000 years, mohummads application may be wrong but his desperation to save souls and have them believe in the one true God is correct, though of course God can save anyone he so chooses believer or not none are exempt from the gift of grace since Jesus died on the cross for all men not just a few men, none are exempt from Gods voice now he speaks to all and calls them to repent and turn from unrighteousness and become charitable, what is he saying to you?

And if you don't know the way than start studying the bible and applying it because knowledge alone can not save men.

https://youtu.be/982PKhPsIHk

Edited December 9, 2015 by Tab'le De'Bah-Rye

[CatherineM]

Two things. I want to vote for "none of the above." Second, if he gets elected, phatmassers can crash at my place. 

[Tab'le De'Bah-Rye]

can you only choose to vote for 2 people? Why not vote an underdog, a vote for an underdog is one less vote for either candidate even if the underdog doesn't get in statistics will show that it wasn't a majority slide and also your conscience will be elevated for choosing to do what is right and true even when you loose.

[Guest]

I have never voted nor never will. It doesn't matter.

[Tab'le De'Bah-Rye]

voting is soooo important if you don't want the freaks to take over as they perhaps have because no one is voting. What are the comparison of voters now days from JFK's days, i bet many more where voting back than, people are lazy now days and i rekon its because the multi tasking section of there brains have been effected by moving pictures. And everyone having a T.V only started around JFKs time although people had t.v's it wasn't everyone, and the serious side effects of it prob doesn't take effect for 21-26 years. Seriously though some chick told me T.V causes tunnel vision and i meditated upon this and prayed to God and he revealed to me it does and that tunnel vision effects the part of the brain for multi tasking, something to do with peripheral vision and seeing only some of the picture and not the whole.

[dominicansoul]

9 hours ago, CatherineM said:

Two things. I want to vote for "none of the above." Second, if he gets elected, phatmassers can crash at my place. 

does that offer stand if hillary wins?  lol

[Anomaly]

9 hours ago, Josh said:

I have never voted nor never will. It doesn't matter.

That is an unfortunate attitude.   Would you rather be the dictator and you personally pick the President by yourself?

i believe you can fool anyone part of the time, but not everyone all of the time.  Nor do I think anyone is perfect.

  I always vote, and have since I was 18.   Sometimes I voted for the winner, often not.  My vote never "did not matter".   I registered my opinion along with many others   Sometimes we were the majority    Sometimes we were a significant minority and losing and winning candidates tweaked their behavior for the next election or maybe more people changed their minds.  

We live in a society and it takes many to be informed and voice their opinion to help guide and choose our leaders.   I try do do my small part though some may think it's insignificant.  I'm also a little relieved it's not all my responsibility.

I don't always agree with your positions and opinions, Josh.  But I do recognize you're essentially a good man with passion and brings a different perspective to issues.   Of course you should vote.  Two heads are probably better than one.  Maybe together were more accurate than just one perspective.   If so, two have more of an impact than one.   If not, maybe smarter people than us will care enough to vote and overcome our error.   If people engage and care to participate in society, it eventually is the best for all.  

 

Edited December 9, 2015 by Anomaly