The Divine Substance - On the Subject of Hand Communion

June 16, 2015

CAUTION !!

This Product Contains Information Repulsive To The New

World Order, and Therefore Simply Too Dangerous

For Mass Diffusion.

READ ONLY AT YOUR OWN RISK OF BEING

WELL-INFORMED.

A SHORT DISCUSSION ON
THE DIVINE SUBSTANCE
HOLY COMMUNION ON THE TONGUE WHILE KNEELING
AS COMPARED TO COMMUNION IN THE HAND WHILE STANDING
Nicky Eltz

"But I say that I cannot be for it (Hand Communion), and also cannot recommend it."
The Priest has, "as servant of the Holy Eucharist and all Holy forms, a primary responsibility — primary, because it is complete."
"To touch the Holy Creations is a privilege of the ordained." Laymen can only get such permission "for a true emergency."
Pope John Paul II
Dear Catholic!
This Addendum represents only a modest attempt to bring a flicker of light onto an extremely delicate, hazy, confusing, volatile and, to many also, painful subject. Good, simple and true information is dearly lacking or, to be more precise, is well hidden from the majority of good Catholics by this subject's so well broadcast and therefore highly influential opponents. In this excessively technology-ridden world, so infested with mis- and disinformation, it is often very difficult to get to the core of any truly worthwhile subjects. This is just one such case, yet still Holy Communion is the only subject without which the world, in the holy opinion of St. Padre Pio, would cease to exist. What follows is only a fraction of the vast amount of information available in Catholic history and mysticism, and it is this with which, it seems, surprisingly few Catholics of today, religious as well as lay, are familiar. This Addendum merely outlines what, in the opinion of millions, our Holy Mother Church, under the guidance of her Mother, Mary, wishes of its Bishops, Priests and laity when it comes to distributing and receiving of Holy Communion. May Mary intercede and, through these pages, speak to many hearts so that this small effort will bear good fruits. ABOVE ALL ELSE, this Addendum is a call to prayer, persistent and deep prayer, regarding this most Holy subject. In all fairness to potential readers of THE DIVINE SUBSTANCE, let it be known already now that it minors unwavering support for Holy Communion on the tongue while kneeling and near to none for any other form of receiving Jesus in the Holy Eucharist. Moreover, it shows five cases where Satan, through different individuals, spoke up for Holy Communion in the hand. If you, dear Catholic, consider yourself a well-informed protagonist of Communion in the hand and can therefore find as much credible and, yes, holy information as is presented here which speaks in its favor, then do not read this Addendum. Were you now to try to find it, you will, considering that it does not exist, simply NOT be able to do so. May God bless you and Mary protect, lead and intercede for you when it comes to receiving Jesus in Holy Communion, The Author
"He is unworthy who celebrates the mystery otherwise than as Christ delivered it."
St. Ambrose

THE BIBLE
"Abraham fell down on his face." (Gen 17:1-3)
All Israelites "threw themselves onto the ground before their tents." (Ex 33:10f)
"At the name of Jesus all knees should bend, in Heaven, on earth and under the earth." (Phil 2:10)
"They fell down and adored it." (the Divine Child, Mt: 2,11)
"Accept it and eat it." (Mt 26:26) "Accepting" or receiving (Greek = lambanein) is passive, passively accept; not "actively take".
"Every knee shall bend before Me." (Is 45:23)
"The twenty-four oldest fell down and adored Him." (Rev 5:13f)
According to Luke (22:19), out of principle only consecrated hands may "take" and "give to" the people. The laity remains passive.
Christ gave the dipped piece to Judas (In 13:26f) and the eucharistic meal to the Apostles. (Lk 22:19) Implication, they did not "take it".
...and many others.
In the Semitic culture during the time of Christ there was no such thing as getting the meal placed into the hand. If the host wished to honor a guest in a special way, he placed a piece of the meal onto the guest's tongue.
Regard for such Jewish customs allows for Communion on the tongue to follow. This historical evidence confirms the biblical conclusion that Christ took a "basic norm" and adjusted it to become a "Divine principle".
THE EARLY CHURCH
Saint Pope Sixtus I, (117-126)
Reminded the Christians of the Apostolic rules and installed that only servants of the cult, Priests, could touch the Holy Mysteries. Origenes, Doctor of the Church, 250
"...be aware with all care and reverence that not the smallest particle of it fall to the ground, that nothing be dropped of the Consecrated Gift. You believe and correctly so, that you have sinned when some is dropped out of carelessness."
Saint Pope Eutychian, (275-283)
“No woman may come close to the altar nor touch the Chalice of the Lord."

Some of the reasons for the temporary appearance of Communion in the hand in the Early Church were, among others, these:
Some of the reasons for the temporary appearance of Communion in the hand in the Early Church were, among others, these: 1) Heresies:
In the 2nd and 3rd Centuries there occurred influential philosophical/theological streams of thought to deny the Divinity of Christ and to make the Christian Community unsure of itself. The writers of the Church, with the true faith, were in that time still having theological troubles explaining the mystery of the Holy Trinity, and besides this there were dangerous omissions (Subordinationism). 2) Practical Conditions:
The shapelessness thereof, and therefore the danger of particles crumbling from the broken and leavened Eucharistic bread, made, among other things, placing it into mouths difficult. 3) Bloody Persecutions:
With this often being the case, a legitimate handling of Holy Communion (for instance House Communion) occurred alongside provable misuses and forbidden diffusion of it (for instance, Communion brought to the sick by the laity). 4) Religious Laxity:
After 313 AD the Church experienced an outward peace. It came to a rapid growth of Church members, yet, despite their being baptized, many remained with their old (immoral) customs. 5) Loss of Faith:
Despite the banishment of Arianism (denial of the Divinity of Christ) at the Council of Nicea (325 AD) the arianistic beliefs soon touched the entire Church. Emperor Constantine B (337-361 AD) persecuted correctly believing Bishops and caused that most Bishoprics were still occupied by Arians. The Catholic Church was, for the first time, in danger of going under due to an internal decrease in the true faith. Only very few Bishops, including the often banished Saint Athanasius, offered any resistance.
There is no evidence to be found that any early Pope at any time ever permitted or distributed Holy Communion into the hands of the laity.
When Arianism was finally defeated, when the present shape of Communion wafers was installed, and when many horrible misuses of Hosts due to Communion in the hand had been reported, it led back to Communion on the tongue. Communion in the hand was rejected by the Church in 5th and 6th Centuries. In the furthest parts of Gaul (later to become France) it took a bit longer until the Councils of Rouen (650 & 878 AD). Also in Spain, where Communion on the tongue experienced strong opposition from the heretical Sect of the Casians, it was finally installed again at the Synod of Cordova (839 AD).
Council of Trent (1545-63)
"...that the power was handed to the Apostles and their successors in the Priesthood to consecrate His Body and Blood and to distribute it." The laity, again, remains passive.
SAINTS
Saint Augustine, 430
"...but no-one eats this flesh, before he has not adored it… we sin if we do not adore it."
Saint Francis, 1226
"And when He is offered by the Priest at the altar and is carried somewhere, then all the people should bend their knees and show the Lord, the living and true God, praise, glory and devotion."
Saint Thomas Aquinas, 1274
He emphasized that the Most Holy could only be touched by Consecrated hands, except for "emergencies".
(Jesus to...) Saint Bridget of Sweden, 1373 "Look, my daughter, I left behind five gifts to my Priests... and fifth, the privilege to touch My Most Holy Flesh with their hands."
Saint Catherine of Sienna, 1380 She received Holy Communion from Jesus Himself into the mouth.
Martyr & Saint Cardinal John Fisher, 1535 "Times of flowering or collapse within the history of the Church were always associated with the handling of the Holy Eucharist."
Saint Jean-Marie Vianney, Curé of Ars, 1859 A Consecrated Host left his fingers and flew by itself into the mouth of a First Communicant. A doubter who witnessed this converted and thereupon became a Priest.
EUCHARISTIC MIRACLES
Lanciano, Italy, (750)
Scientists have proven that the material conserved in the church of Lanciano is true human flesh and blood. Both are of the same blood type, the flesh is that of heart muscle, and it is alive.
Sr. Crescentia Höss, 1744 (Stigmata)
The consecrated Host flew out of the Tabernacle, through the length of the Church, and landed in her mouth.
Sr. Maria Columba Schonath, 1787 (Stigmata) The consecrated Host flew out of the Tabernacle, through the length of the Church, and landed in her mouth.
Therese Neumann, 1962 (Stigmata) The consecrated Host flew out of the Tabernacle, through the length of the Church, and landed in her mouth. Also, while blinded by blood emanating from her eyes while suffering Christ's Passion, she could tell that a layman had sneaked into her room dressed as a Priest, and she thereupon spoke up and sent him out of the room (which was off limits to all but Priests at that moment). Marthe Robin, 1981 (Stigmata) "When I began to bring the Host toward Marthe's mouth, I could not. The Host itself flew toward her mouth and placed itself onto her tongue." Fr. Joseph Marie Jacq, 1974. Also, Our Lady told Marthe that she would conquer Freemasonry in France. Remember this as you read on.
Julia Kim of Naju, South Korea When receiving Communion on the tongue, the Host has turned into flesh and blood. This miracle started in June 1988, on the Feast of Corpus Christi, yet it has continued into the '90s and been witnessed by the Holy Father in Rome.
There are even Eucharistic Miracles recorded where simple animals knelt down before consecrated Hosts. What does that say about the callousness that many church-going human beings of today show toward the Eucharistic Jesus?
Moreover, nowhere can one find a Eucharistic Miracle where a consecrated Host landed in someone's hands. Might there be a reason for this?
POPES
Pope Leo XIII, 1903 "As soon as the order of reason contradicts Eternal Life and the Authority of God, it becomes permitted to disobey, people that is, in order to obey God." Saint Pope Pius X, 1914 "In the moment of receiving Holy Communion one must kneel." Pope Paul VI, 1978 Hand Communion started in Holland in 1965/66, as a result of some LAITY QUESTIONING WHETHER JESUS WAS TRULY PRESENT in the Consecrated Host. This sounds similar to: "denial of the Divinity of Christ." Pope Paul VI in the Encyclical MYSTERIUM FIDEI already rejected so-called "Hand Communion" as an "already spread false opinion". He thereupon asked the Dutch Bishops to write to all their Priests and "to give them directives to once again return to the traditional manner of receiving Holy Communion". He also wrote against the increasing misuse of sex in marriages (pill, etc...) three years later in his Encyclical HUMANAE VITAE. NEITHER of these instructions was passed on by the Dutch Bishops and their Priests remained uncensored and unpunished. (Note: While acknowledging that nothing except Hell is ever beyond reparation, today, only 30 years later, Holland has, under the banner of liberal individualism, become a spiritual and moral tumor of a terminal nature. E.g. 9% of all deaths there are today the result of active euthanasia. (Even a young girl with multiple sclerosis was killed in this way.)
In 1969 the ever-increasing number of Bishops who pushed for Communion in the hand (including by then in Germany, France and Belgium) requested of Pope Paul VI to give special permission for it in order to "sanction the disobedience". Surprisingly, and after much hard-fought resistance, he seemed to give in, and later in 1969 gave certain Bishops' Conferences, where the opposing manner of receiving Holy Communion had (in disobedience) taken hold, "special permission" to allow it. Then this "special permission" was ONLY granted to "certain communities and certain towns", and most certainly NOT in all Dioceses and also NOT "as a custom", and therefore its illegal inception as well as its spreading throughout so many countries is misleading, invalid, erroneous and, finally, wrong. The limited permission that Pope Paul VI gave was dragged out of him under force and deceitful conditions. Is there any wonder why he said that the "smoke of Satan" had entered the Church? In order to stem this ever-increasing "custom in disobedience" the Pope then (also in 1969) turned to the whole Church, wherein he warned seriously (vehementer hortatur) of the dangers of Communion in the hand and advised "for the good of the Church itself' that all Bishops, Priests and Laity once again conform with the again confirmed manner of Holy Communion on the tongue. This warning and the resulting advice have full validity until today! In 1975 Pope Paul's cherished liturgical expert and advisor on this very issue, Archbishop Annibale Bugnini, the very author of LITURGICAL RE-FORM (NOVUS ORDO MISSAE), was dismissed by the Pope when Bugnini's Masonic affiliation was exposed. Bugnini had, back when the issue was being handled, far overstated the opinions of the minority and, at the same time, far understated that of the over-whelming majority. He had advised the Pope with outright lies and wild distortions, but the damage had already been done and all Catholicism was well on its way to being undermined by this betrayal. So, rather than reading LITURGICAL REFORM, co-advised as it was by a team of Protestants, read instead, when submersed in prayer, the Bible, read the writings of this Holy Father, and then read and live Our Lady's messages from locations around the world where at least veneration has been approved. It was reported that a few hours before his death, Pope Paul VI, when Holy Communion was brought to his room, got out of his sick bed and dropped onto his knees to receive Jesus. Pope John Paul 1, 1978 The night he was murdered by another Freemason in the cloth, Pope John Paul 1 had in the drawer of his desk a list of some 30 Cardinals and Bishops who were Freemasons, and whom he was going to dismiss the following day. Pope John Paul 2 After 11 years of Hand Communion, he said: "In several countries Communion in the hand has become the norm. At the same time voices expressing the lack of reverence of eucharistic forms are becoming louder— a lack that not only must be shouldered by those demonstrating it, but also by the Shepherds of the Church." Do we now understand why, as Our Lady has said, our Holy Father suffers?! In Germany, in 1980, he said: "But I say that I cannot be for it (Hand Communion), and also cannot recommend it." Also that the Priest has, "as servant of the Holy Eucharist and all Holy forms, a primary responsibility — primary, because it is complete." "To touch the Holy Creations is a privilege of the ordained." Laymen can only get such permission "for a true emergency". "But, I myself have seen the Pope distribute Holy Communion in the hand," you might be saying to yourself
right now. This is true. However, when he does so, it is ONLY because he at that moment finds himself in a country where the Conference of Bishops has decided to disobey his and his predecessor's relevant instructions and he therefore does not wish to antagonize the Conference of Bishops, thereby giving rise to possible schisms on this issue. When Bishops disobey the Pope, there is, OF COURSE, no culpability on the behalf of the laity, that is, IF all the information that they have received is ONLY from their bishop. The Holy Father, when visiting France in the 1980s, refused to give Holy Communion into the hand of then President of France, Discard d'Estaing, and his wife who, prior to the meeting, had so boldly announced that she would stand up to the Pope in this regard! The Pope did not give in, and all this was shown on French television. While in Zagreb, Croatia, in September 1994, the Holy Father had assisting Priests On lieu of altar boys) using enormous patens to catch any possible particles that might have fallen while he distributed Holy Communion. The author, and therefore also millions of others, saw that when communicants still attempted to raise their hands, they simply had to stop and receive Communion on the tongue from the Pope or otherwise bump into those large patens. In so doing, HE GAVE THEM NO CHOICE. Not one person received Communion in the hand that day, at least not from Our Lady's Holy Father. While in Krakow, Poland, in June of 1997, again, no Hand Communion was distributed by the Priests concelebrating at the Papal Mass. CARDINALS Cardinal Julius Döpfner, 1976 Shortly before his death he said: "Had I known that through Communion in the hand so much lack of reverence was to be practiced, I would have never spoken for it... Today one goes to Holy Communion like one took holy water in the past. For two years, I fought for Communion in the hand. Now that I have seen the results, I would never again do it. But now, I know of no way to rescind what has occurred. Get rid of Communion in the hand!" Cardinal Franjo Šeper, 1981 (Former Prefect, Congregation for the Propagation of the Faith) "The question of Hand Communion is for me not a question of the form, but ... a question of faith and therefore truly a decision of conscience for the Priest." "No-one, having asked his conscience, can thereupon feel the need to request Communion in the hand." Please ask yourself, dear Catholic, when and why you ever started with Holy Communion in the hand. Do so honestly, and then take the answer into prayer. Was it a good reason or was it simply, as so much else in our generation, because "everyone else was doing it"? Had you been informed correctly and thoroughly at the time? Please listen to this important Cardinal, and you too ask Jesus whether he might have been right? Or were you perhaps, like so many others, merely swept along "by the times" and were thereby never given a true chance to really ask or listen to Jesus about this. If so, PLEASE do so now. Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (Prefect, Congregation for the Propagation of the Faith) "We must reconquer the dimension of Holiness in the Liturgy." (1988) The obvious implication is that "the dimension of Holiness" has been lost. 19TH AND 20TH CENTURY MYSTICS
Katharina Emmerich, 1824 (stigmata) Considered the most famous of all German mystics, Katharina saw Jesus distribute the bread into the mouths of the Apostles. Therese Neumann, 1962 (stigmata) She lived only on the Consecrated Host for some 35 years and also saw Jesus distribute the bread into the mouths of the Apostles. When `Resl' was being asked by Fr. Joseph Haber to describe what she saw while having visions of the Christ being removed from the Cross, the following exchange occurred: Haber: And they were the ones who held Him up there? Resl: Yes. The old man was up there and the other one, a pious one also, he was one of those who are not always with the Savior (disciple). They had a good grip on the Savior, from behind, the ladders stood firmly, and they could fold over the long linen cloth, he (Joseph of Arimethea) gave all the orders. They, by the way, were not allowed to touch the Savior with their bare hands, they had a real, what's it called? Haber: Reverence? Resl: Yes, I surely liked that, surely liked it. It was good for the Mother (Mary) also. ... St. Padre Pio, 1968 (stigmata) "How often is ... this kiss of peace given to us in the Holiest Sacrament! Yes, we must burn in yearning for this kiss of the Divine mouth, moreover let us be even more grateful!" Maria Simma of Sonntag, Austria (Suffering Soul for and Visionary of the Poor Souls in Purgatory) In carrying their suffering either mystically or with prayer, she has, since the 1960s, delivered 40 to 50 Priests (incl. Bishops), most of whom were in Purgatory due to spreading the practice of Communion in the hand or similar irreverent practices. Maria calls Hand Communion, "the work of the devil" She also repeats often what the Poor Souls tell her, and an often expressed worry of theirs is that "the Church of today is in the worst shape that it has been since its very beginning." Reminder: As St. Louis de Montfort advised us, a true Marian devotion includes a love and better understanding for the Poor Souls in Purgatory. Sr. Agnes Sasagawa of Akita, Japan * (stigmata) While her Sisters were all receiving Holy Communion in their hands, the stigmata of her left hand forced it shut with horrible pain, and she was therefore forced to receive Jesus on the tongue. At the same instant the wound in the right hand of the wooden statue of Our Lady bled from the identical spot. Could these sufferings respectively have been reparation for the abuses in the left hands of the laity and the right hands of Priests? Of course. Since then Sr. Agnes and all her Sisters receive Holy Communion only on the tongue. * Recognized by the Church. Sr. Anna All of Kenya (stigmata)
Sr. Anna converses with Jesus and her revelations focus on Eucharistic devotion. Jesus has told her that Freemasonry has agreed to abolish Him from the Holy Mass. CHURCH DOCUMENTS
THE DOCUMENTS OF VATICAN II
These contain nothing at all about this so crucial subject, and yet millions of people wrongfully associate Hand Communion with Vatican II. THE CREED OF GOD'S PEOPLE by Pope Paul VI I, II, III, IV. REVERENT RECEPTION 1) ... 2) The required Eucharistic fasting for at least one hour prior to Holy Communion (medicine and water exempted); becoming, respectful attire. One should only come to the table of the Lord with great reverence, the hands folded, the eyes sunken. THE CATECHISM OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH, 1993
The Catechism also has nothing at all concerning this matter, and this lack of any pertinent information in 1993 is in itself of great interest. Why is there no mention of it? Certainly not because its main authors, Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger and Cardinal Christoph Schönborn, are protagonists of Hand Communion, but then again they are both very close to the present Holy Father.
RECENT PAPAL INSTRUCTIONS MEMORIALE DOMINI by Pope Paul VI The Pope's Letter (DOMINICAE CENAE) to All Bishops & Priests October 18-22, 1968 & May 29, 1969
This includes:
"In view of the state of the Church as a whole today, this manner of distributing Holy Communion (on the tongue) therefore should be observed, not only because it rests upon the tradition of many centuries, but especially because it is a sign of reverence by the faithful toward the Eucharist. The practice of placing Holy Communion on the tongue of the communicants in no way de-tracts from their personal dignity. This traditional manner of administering Holy Communion gives more effective assurance that the Holy Communion will be given to the faithful with due reverence, decorum and dignity."
And this then is followed by the votes of all the world's Bishops that were overwhelmingly against Communion in the hand. Then follows an excerpt in which the strict conditionality of this tolerance is very clear:
"Yet, if the opposing practice, meaning the placement the Holy Communion in the hand, is already spread widely, then the Apostolic Seat, in order to alleviate the assignment of the pastoral office, that in today's situation is be-coming ever more difficult, conveys the instruction and the burden of responsibility of considering the special conditions in each case, yet only under the condition that every danger of a deterioration of reverence and the increase of false opinions about the Holy Communion are kept away and that deficiencies are avoided."
"Opposing practice" and only under the condition"? Do these expressions and all the rest sound to you as
though the Princes of the Church (including the Pope, whose decree this afterall was) and particularly the men at the Congregation for the Holy Liturgy, were so enthusiastic about Hand Communion? It certainly does not. This paragraph, as does the rest of the document, bums with an all-inclusive anxiety that Holy Communion does not lose its holiness in the way it is handled by both the Priests as well as the faithful.
This is the ONLY document where a tolerance of Hand Communion can be found, yet does this in any way change how it came about that the Church was forced into letting it occur? It does not. There was blatant dishonesty, manipulation and sedition on the behalf of Bugnini, and he certainly was not operating alone. This was subversion in the Church. Can that lead to good fruits? No, it cannot, and it has not. Were something comparable to occur in a government or industrial environment, the resulting aftermath would naturally have been corrected a long time ago. And, it is here that our own consciences MUST start functioning and we must thereupon quickly start to also act accordingly.
also
THE MYSTERY & THE CULT OF THE HOLY EUCHARIST by Pope John Paul II
The Pope's Letter (DOMINICAE CENAE) to All Bishops & Priests February 24, 1980 This includes:
"How eloquently the rite of the anointing of Priests' hands in our Latin ordination tells that a special grace and power of the Holy Spirit is necessary precisely for Priests' hands! To touch the Holy Eucharist and to distribute them with their own hands is a privilege of the ordained."
also
INESTIMABLE GIFT (INAESTIMABILE DONUM) On Some Norms Concerning the Cult of the Eucharistic Mystery by Pope John Paul II
The Holy Congregation for the Sacraments and Divine Worship (Holy Thursday) April 3, 1980
This includes:
"The Holy Eucharist is the gift of the Lord, which should be distributed to laymen THROUGH THE INTER-MEDIATION OF CATHOLIC PRIESTS who are ordained especially for this work. Laymen are neither permitted to take the Sacred Host by themselves nor the Consecrated Chalice."
What has become clear by now is that the present Holy Father did attempt, in a very gentle way, to rescind the earlier-mentioned tolerance into which his predecessor had been coerced by constant pressure and mis- and disinformation. What do we do? Do we try to unravel the political infighting inside the Vatican some 25 to 30 years ago, or do we simply do what the present Holy Father wishes of us? Ask Our Lady what we today should be doing, if you on your own are still confused. She will ever so gently, yet also firmly and permanently instill in you the form that is in God's wishes. Let her lead you also in this regard.
OTHER TESTIMONIES
Martin Luther, 1546 He rejected receiving the Lutheran Lord's Supper with the hand as being "an expression of lack of faith". Considering the real presence in the moment of the Lord's Supper (Lutheran formulation), Luther also accepted God's principle of Communion on the tongue.
Anneliese Michel, 1976 (incorrupt)
As this girl from a pious German family was, at 16, suddenly afflicted with demonic Possession, the demon was (during an Exorcism ordered by the local Bishop) forced to give the following account: "The thing (Holy Host) may not be placed into the hands. The Priests must be courageous. The laity may not distribute it. During the distribution of that stuff (Holy Communion) one must kneel. On the order of that one there (pointing at a statue of Mary nearby), Hand Communion must be gotten rid of, for it is my work. The Bishop must forbid Hand Communion, if he can achieve it.”
Mother Teresa of Calcutta, 1998
The Sisters of Charity allow only Communion on the tongue, and, when asked about this, one of her senior Sisters responded: "Mother Teresa has asked for this because she wishes her Sisters to be obedient to the Pope." (1996) It is also reported that when a group of Bishops, while visiting Mother Teresa in Calcutta, asked her what, in her opinion, the worst evil in the crisis of the Church was, she answered, surprising them all, that it was the "modern form of receiving Communion." Mother Angelica, EWTN TV "Very few children I have met have ever been taught that He is really, truly, present in the Holy Eucharist. ... We find Hosts in missalets, we find Hosts under pews under chewing gum... I have seen a 9 year-old girl, go to Communion and pop one like an M&M. (An American candy.) I have seen people put it into their sleeves, put it in their pockets, and leave it on the pew." Try putting chewing gum under the pew with your mouth. Professor Klaus Camber, 1978 (Liturgical Expert)
"Hand Communion stands in crass opposition to the long ago determined reverent and fearfully careful handling of the Most Holy." Helmut Thielicke (Evangelical Prof. of Theology) "If the Transubstantiation, or the changing form of the bread and wine, were to be correct, then one ought never again get up from kneeling!" Granted, this is unnecessary outside of Holy Mass and Adoration, yet, then again, this is also a most holy expression for someone who, in fact, is still searching. Certainly God will bless this man profusely. This remark is dramatic confirmation, dear Catholic, for the fact that often recent converts make better Catholics than born Catholics. Chaplain Schallinger & 242 other Priests (In a letter to Pope John Paul 2 in 1979) "We can, due to questions of conscience, not distribute Hand Communion." Fraternity of Priests of St Peter (formed by Pope John Paul 2 in 1988) Their Priests distribute "no Hand Communion."
PSYCHOLOGY
Are we not also responsible to pass true reverence for the Most Holy of Holies on to our children and grandchildren? It makes an enormous difference to children whether they, for instance, see their most respected and often idolized grand-parents kneeling humbly in front of the Eucharistic Jesus or whether they see them standing and again just receiving "something in the hand". We are responsible for our children! "BRING MY CHILDREN TO ME, BLOCK THEM NOT."
Are we not also responsible for evangelizing and spreading God's love as well as word to those many who have yet to experience them? And what more reliable way is there to do this than by our respectful, loving and, yes, reverent example when we find ourselves directly before God — God in the Most Holy Eucharist? None. Human psychology is such that anything that many touch becomes profane. Already in the Old Testament God requires, when it concerns the laity, the prohibition of touching all that is holy. Only those called to attending to the holy are exempted. Examples: Mt. Sinai; Case of the Covenant; Consecration at the Temple; and others. If museums never let the people touch their most cherished exhibits (just try touching the Mona Lisa, the Hope Diamond or the Declaration of In-dependence without prior permission!), and if armies of security never let the people touch their Presidents (just try touching Clinton, Schroeder, Jelzin or Chirac without prior permission!), WHY DO SOME PEOPLE STILL THINK THEY MAY TOUCH THE EUCHARISTIC JESUS, OUR GOD AND OUR SAVIOR, without such a permission and privilege having been bestowed upon them by the Church, and thereby through the Holy Spirit? Those exhibited treasures mentioned above are most likely fakes themselves, while Jesus never is! Concerning those Chiefs of State, comments are unnecessary. When the Consecrated Host is touched by the general public then subconsciously it becomes denigrated to the level of another general blessed thing or object. And, the thereby resulting unconsciously denigrated and, therefore, incorrect association toward the Holy Eucharist is a hidden danger for the faithful, whose WILLING ACCEPTANCE OUR TRUE FAITH ITSELF FOR-BIDS. On the other hand, the human psyche values an act of touching it with the lips as a clean and thus sacred act of love (a kiss). When your grand-mother, or any other more honored guest, asked for some-thing on the other side of your dinner table and, because of impractical circumstances of the moment, you took it with your hand rather than taking hold of the dish itself, remember, you said: "Pardon my hands." Are you an honored guest at Jesus' table? Moslems keep their left hand off the table during all meals. This is because other natural functions are attended to with the left hand. When a thief is punished in any of the more radical fundamentalist Moslems countries, the right hand, the one with which he eats, is then chopped off.
MEDICAL ASPECTS
It is medically proven that saliva has anti-bacterial properties, and 1 to 2 liters of saliva wash and cleanse the mouth in a single day. The hand, however, as an outer member, is always a carrier of dirt and illness due to contact with doorknobs, money, greetings, ETC... When some people, as a somewhat feeble retort, ask whether you sin more with your hands or your mouth, you can, with the same frailty of human logic, respond to them with the question whether they clean ... ? For that matter, sin only emanates from our hearts, minds and wills and that is after all the reason for our coming to Jesus' Sacred Heart in passively attending and receiving from His Sacred Table at Holy Communion in the first place. In short, to heal our hearts, minds and wills, not our hands. Some people have expressed worries that in these times of A.I.D.S. and similar illnesses, Holy Communion on the tongue might increase the chances of such conditions spreading. Any doctor will tell us, for A.I.D.S. to become dangerus in this respect, open wounds (broken skin) would have to be present around the mouth. In 99% of Communions distributed onto the tongue, no contact of any sort occurs. Were this fear warranted, then by now all physical contact of any kind ought to be forbidden. Moreover, searching for a Priest who has contacted such an illness through distributing Holy Communion on the tongue will remain fruitless. As we saw earlier, the Divine Substance in Lanciano is that of live human heart tissue. The next time you are at a large hospital with the capabilities for cardiac operations, go in and ask its senior staff whether you may handle some live human heart tissue. You will be escorted to the next exit, if not to the closest Psychiatric Ward. Are they perhaps being "unbrotherly" in forbidding it, or are they insuring that it stays clean or, as some might prefer to say, sacred?
HISTORY OF ART
While not having access to the necessary sources, Old Master Paintings often show Jesus putting the bread, having dipped it first into the wine, into the Apostles' mouths, as was the Jewish custom. Most contrary to the so-called art of today, the Old Masters, their schools and their students were all meticulous in representing every subject that they tackled with uncompromising exactitude. The precision of these paintings can also be confirmed in the present Catechism, under The Seven Sacraments. Museums around the world, that own 'Old Masters', exhibit this scene repeatedly, and this subject alone would warrant a separate discussion if not a research paper or even a full-fledged book with many sacred illustrations. (See Tiepolo, Tintoretto, etc...)
THE ANTI-CHRISTIAN OPPOSITION
Already in the 19th Century, we may quote Stanislas de Guaita. He was a fallen away Priest, a kabbalist, a Satanist and a model for all Freemasons. "When we have succeeded in having Catholics receive Communion in the hand, then we will have met our goal." The following can be quoted from a Masonic Plan in the year 1925: "How can one rob the faithful of their belief in the true presence? ... First one must bring people everywhere to receive communion while standing, then one must place the Host in their hands. Prepared in this fashion, they will come to see the Eucharist as a mere symbol of a general brotherly meal and will thereby fall away." And the following can be quoted from a list of Masonic directives in the year 1962, as given by an American Grand Master. Of 34 separate anti-Catholic suggestions made in it, here is...
#6 "Stop Communicants from kneeling to receive the Host. Tell Nuns to stop the children from folding their hands to and from Communion."
Today, when Ireland, Croatia and Poland are being especially targeted by the Freemasons, just one anti-Christ(ian) outgrowth of this will be that Hand Communion, now more than ever before, will encroach even deeper yet into their churches, today three of the sturdiest left in Europe. Other eastern European countries, beware! Please understand very clearly, and for the sake of your very soul, that the ultimate goal of Freemasonry is the total destruction of the Church and the Eucharistic Jesus is the very core of the Church, IS HE NOT? How immense will Mr. Bugnini's reparation be?
SO PLEASE, STOP IMMEDIATELY FROM HELPING THEM WITH THEIR DOOMED ATTEMPT TO DO SO!
The case of Anneliese Michel was discussed throughout the world press in the late 1970s. The most detailed study of her case was made by the American Anthropologist, Dr. Felicitas Goodman, who was not Catholic. The demons were under orders of the attending Priests as well as Our Lady herself. Again, they said:
"THE THING MAY NOT BE PLACED INTO THE HANDS. ... THE LAITY MAY NOT DISTRIBUTE IT. DURING THE DISTRIBUTION OF THAT STUFF, ONE MUST KNEEL. ON THE ORDER OF THAT ONE THERE (MARY), HAND COMMUNION MUST BE GOTTEN RID OF, FOR IT IS MY WORK." "...IT IS MY WORK," says the demon. Please pray about this and ask either Jesus or Mary to confirm or correct this. Trust in Them and They will, in Their time, do one or the other; but, first you must open yourself to Them in this regard. When, as a result of legal proceedings brought on by the Government against both Anneliese's family and the attending Priests and Bishop, her earthly remains were later disinterred and found to be incorrupt. Every western press today reports an epidemic of satanic practices, and even the New York Police Department has in recent years come to the Catholic Church for advice in dealing with it. The lowest of all such practices is the so-called `black mass' where each time consecrated Hosts are offered to Satan for desecration. Does it then not follow that getting those needed Hosts has be-come so much easier due to someone's sloppiness? Somebody in our ranks will be held responsible for every one of those!

MY IMMACULATE HEART WILL TRIUMPH
FATIMA Sr. Lucia, Jacinta, & Francesco In 1916 these three visionaries received Holy Communion from the hand of an angel: "...he held a chalice in his hand, over it a Host from which drops of blood dripped into it." He then placed the Host in Lucia's mouth and gave the contents of the chalice to Jacinta and Francesco. Sr. Lucia: "Moved by the power of the supernatural that surrounded us, we all imitated what the angel did, this means we all knelt down like him." "...LIKE HIM"! We humans are not allowed to do something that the an-gels do not do when in the presence of Jesus, that is, IF we wish to speak here about the SAME angels God's!
AMSTERDAM Ida Peerdeman, 1995 In the picture of "The Lady Of All Nations" *, Mary's feet stand on Holland and Germany. Our Lady warned of a great peril that, because of false doctrine and heresy, would befall the Church. Through Ida Our Lady asked that Rome be made aware that this error would have its origin in Holland. * Approved for veneration by the Bishop of Haarlem, May 1996. GARABANDAL Concita Gonzales
She received Holy Communion from Archangel Michael on July 18, 1962. As above, she also "suddenly fell to her knees." Those around her could watch as "a small Host started becoming visible on her tongue, and then grew larger until the size of a Host that a Priest has at Holy Communion, although thicker." This was filmed, a copy of which is in the Vatican. And even if this was in 1962, Concita has NOT changed her ways regarding this matter, and she never will.
AKITA Sr. Agnes Sasagawa * (stigmata) REPEAT: While her Sisters were all receiving Holy Communion with their hands, the stigmata of her left hand forced it shut with horrible pain, and she was therefore forced to receive Jesus on the tongue. At the very same instant the wound in the right hand of the wooden statue of Our Lady bled from the very same spot. Could these sufferings respectively have been reparation for the abuses in the left hands of the laity and the right hands of Priests? Yes, they could have, moreover since then Sr. Agnes and all her Sisters receive Holy Communion only on the tongue. * Recognized by the Church. MEDUGORJE Marija, Vicka, Mirjana, Ivanka, Ivan and Jacov, Jelena and Marijana
There Our Lady said during one of her first apparitions that the reason she went to Medugorje was that "here the true faith is being practiced." Does not "true faith" perhaps also include that when Our Lady started appearing there ONLY Communion on the tongue was the local practice? It was the western pilgrims who brought Hand Communion to Medugorje. "True faith" concerns, ABOVE ALL ELSE, the appropriate reverence toward the presence of Jesus, our Savior and God, in the Consecrated Host. For if it does not, then for true Catholics it means nothing at all, and we can all go bowling instead of receiving the Lord. * Approved for veneration. In the first weeks of Medugorje, and while the children were forced to have the apparition in many different places around the village, it happened that Our Lady appeared to them out in the fields. On one such very well documented occasion, someone in the crowd asked of Marija Pavlović whether they too could touch Our Lady. Marija then took people's hands and placed them where Our Lady was. After having done this for a while the visionary started crying and when asked why, she responded that each touch left a dirty spot on Our Lady. At that point THEY STOPPED doing this. If they stopped doing so because the Blessed Mother was becoming dirty, does this not tell us that we should not touch Jesus in the Eucharist either? Yes, it does. Also, in the message in which Our Lady advised the faithful there to pray the "seven Our Fathers" after the evening Mass, she included the word "kneeling". Today the great majority of faithful there do kneel during "the sevens", as they so naturally also do up on the two mountains or when in one of the visionaries' houses for an apparition, and this must tell us that those same ones, the greatest majority that is, would in fact much prefer to also do so during
Holy Communion. Might these facts not also be gently nudging, gently advising something about how Holy Communion itself, which happens either 60 to 80 minutes later or about 5 to 15 minutes before or 2-3 hours before, ought to be received? Of course it does, and the need for kneeling there is even so very much greater than at either "the sevens" or during any of the many apparitions, because Jesus is our God, not Mary —the same Mary, that is, who advised the children many years ago that were they to have the choice between an apparition and Holy Mass that they were to opt for Holy Mass. Remember, Our Lady leads, leads us to Jesus, yet still never antagonizes, demands, or judges. Voices of local administrative authority have, while in visible distress, stated that this so very crucial issue "...has nothing at all to do with Medugorje!" This author begs to differ and does so most vehemently, for the above situations alone are ample proof for his heartfelt concern. Here already we have three separate mystical events in Medugorje (or, if we dare, "messages by implication") that occurred in its earliest days, and these, when summarized, are "true faith", "not to be touched" and "kneeling". And naturally this combination ought to point us unhesitantly toward the traditional form of receiving Holy Communion.
The former Bishop of Mostar, the diocese in which Medugorje is to be found, permitted Hand Communion to be practiced, so this is by no means a suggestion or, even much less, a call that the Franciscans there should change anything at St. James' Church. But Our Lady's messages there, both the direct ones as well as those given by her images or example, are after all far more important to us Marian laymen than the innumerable confusions and conflicts within the Church Hierarchy. Mary is calling us to change our hearts and to do so toward Jesus, and only from there, from within our hearts, will all outer behaviors then also naturally change. Mary is coming to us to protect and to lead her Church, and we, her children, are her Church! Do not pester the already over-worked Medugorje Priests or visionaries about this, but, go ahead, pester Jesus or Mary to speak directly to your open heart. When the visionaries there say, as happens quite often, that Our Lady wishes for us to receive Holy Communion with the heart, this means with love. With love, when it after all concerns God Himself, means with a loving and thus true reverence. Yes, the inner content is initially more important than the outer form, yet the outer form IS A RESULT of a more reverent inner content. Moreover, when it concerns the others, for whom we ARE, remember, also responsible, our outer form, based on our own reverent inner content, leads the others to better inner content as well. Without even trying to ask Medugorje pilgrims outside his regular circle of friends and acquaintances about this issue, this author can testify that he alone knows at least a dozen westerners who, due to their prayer-lives having deepened exponentially in Medugorje, changed over from Hand Communion to the traditional form of receiving on their very own, yet he knows of not a single one who ever changed in the other direction. There must be a good reason for this and considering that Our Lady's presence in Medugorje is the one and only new message to be found there, this just has to do something with her rather than with anything else. Yet at the same time, in never mentioning this crucial issue in a public message in Medugorje directly, is Our Lady just possibly doing exactly the same as the Holy Father, whom she herself said she "chose for our time", when having to deal with the above mentioned (disobedient) Conferences of Bishops? This author believes so. Is the message in which Our Lady mentioned having chosen THIS HOLY FATHER not alone a sufficient reason that all Catholics ought to follow his God-given loving guardianship for Jesus, for his Mother (Totus Tuus), for their Church, for their Priests, for all their "dear little children," and for the world; and to follow it always? YES, IT IS. If he is the successor to The Rock on which the Church would rest, then please let us stand with it rather than standing up to it! Before the unforgettable weekend of November 24-26, 2000, Fr. Slavko had undoubtedly been the most reverent priest in Medugorje. Already back in 1985, just four years after Mary had begun appearing in Medugorje, he announced the following before a Mass, "Because this is a very holy place, please let us receive Holy Communion on the tongue." This so persevering child and thus imitator of Mary's said to the author a few years later, "Never in my life would I receive in my hand," and, at another time, "yes, I do have a problem with it." (Hand Communion) He too, as a persistent student of Our Lady's, tried his utmost also never to antagonize, demand or judge, but his behavior around the Most Holy of Holies made him the giant Priest among Priests that he was. Now that Mary has told us that Father Slavko was "born into Heaven" immediately, let us take his example. Before and during the latest Balkan war a fellow, 55 or so, was often seen walking around Medugorje. He never talked with , anyone, always wore a construction-type 'hard-hat', and carried a brown leather bag with a strap. One evening a local resident saw him, after receiving the Host in the hand, placing it into his jacket pocket rather than consuming it. After a silent confrontation, whereupon the fellow was forced physically to finally consume it, he was followed out into the dark by another Croatian pilgrim. His bag proved to be empty that evening. In late 1992 he, after having stolen a machine-gun out of a Military Police car, was shot and killed by soldiers at the intersection in Tromeda, right next to the local gas station. He was known in Široki Brieg, Ljubuški, Grude and as far away as Livno for the same thing. He always seemed to have plenty of money and was known for staying in the best hotels around.
Often hundreds of dollars are paid in the West by the organizers of satanic 'black masses' for Consecrated Hosts. This, as the reader might al-ready know, is also approximately the price of a machine-gun. Let us try to pray for that poor soul. When someone refers to the so crucial issue that this short discussion at-tempts to address as, perhaps, questionable spirituality, the author again suggests to the reader that, instead of getting all entangled in someone else's own entanglement in Church legalities rather than blazing in love for Christ, and thereby getting you quite exhausted and confused, listen instead to the words of the powerful Pope Leo XIII. As Pope Leo XIII advises, listen to God when he speaks to your conscience. It is purely YOUR conscience, not someone else's. Or, at the very least, listen to and act upon Our Lady's message concerning the present Pope.
FRUITS OF HAND COMMUNION
First, how then did Hand Communion arrive, for instance, in Italy? If you can believe it, it was due to the tourists, or so said the Priests who then pressured the Conference of Bishops with this so vacuous and self-serving argument. They said that tourists were coming from Germany, France, Belgium and Holland who wanted to receive Communion in the hand and so, not to disturb their (well endowed) holidays, the Priests agreed with them, and then finally so did some Bishops. So, in short, the tourists' spending money triumphed over the true reverence for the Eucharistic Jesus! Other than what has already been mentioned, Hand Communion has only further spread severe reservations among the faithful, and here especially among the young, concerning the true presence of Jesus in Holy Communion. It has, in many parts of the West, caused and then strengthened the idea that the so-called "peace-greeting" is the most important part of the Mass. The peace-greeting too was another idea out of the time of Bugnini et al, and it too has badly weakened the true reverence when the laity is directly in front of the Eucharistic Jesus. Oh, pardon, did someone mention the peace-greeting? Yes, you're right, they did have a peace greeting in the Early Church; but back then it was BE-FORE the Consecration, and NOT right after it, when Jesus is already with us, and when He and His mother both want Him and ONLY HIM to enter our hearts! You and your good neighbor, when it comes to Jesus' and Marys' wishes, you can both wait until you're out on the sidewalk or, better yet, in the café. Remember, we are meant to bring Jesus into the cafés with us, and NOT bring the cafés in to Jesus! When one has a toothache, one seeks the dentist, yet when one has a broken car one seeks the mechanic; and therefore, woe to those who take their toothaches to a mechanic! Our Lady, moreover, most definitely concurs; and here is why.
Once Mary appeared to Marija of Medugorje, and it happened to be only a few minutes after a Consecration. She came at the usual preset time, yet, on this occasion, Mary neither prayed with nor spoke to the visionary, and left after a mere few seconds, having ONLY blessed the small group that was at this Holy Mass. When the attending Priest later asked Marija why it had happened so very quickly, her answer, emphasized by a graceful move of her out-stretched hand directed toward the front of the altar, was: "She didn't talk to me because Jesus was standing, ...here." Further explanation ought not to be necessary. A digression... Hand Communion has also spawned a school of thought in the U.S. Church, spurred on, as is almost everything else in the West, by liberal individualism, which one ought to stand even during the Consecration! The same spirit has recently led the American Bishops to pronounce that the American way of receiving Holy Communion is while standing. And why not cheer, whistle, stomp our feet and bring along garish cheer-leaders with pom-poms flying?! And why not, as this author has himself already witnessed in western Catholic Churches have coffee, watch television and bring one's dogs into church?! It has also indirectly helped remove the Tabernacles from the center of churches, first to a side area, then to a side room, and finally into another building where few, if any at all, can find Jesus, even if they wanted to adore Him. It has also led to the removal of all kneelers from many western churches. Satan is a very sly predator, and as any truly praying individual already knows, he is persistent at attempting to break us and to pull us down, step by step by step by step. In Europe laymen have occasionally organized themselves into groups whose sole responsibility it is to carefully gather up the many crumbs that are left strewn about after Hand Communion. Never before was this a true need, and what used to be taken care of perfectly well by the traditional form of Holy Communion, including the use of patens, is now being done by very loving and reverent souls who do, thank God, still exist. But is it really a wonder by now why so many western churches stand cold, prayerless and empty when Jesus has first been stood up to, then ignored, then replaced, then moved, then removed, and finally discarded altogether?!
Has not the 1925 Masonic Plan done its job very well?! All too well, dear Catholic, and now is the time when we must return to true reverence and, if we wish for our Church to experience the Renewal of which the Holy Father speaks, then do so in crowds. Many have tried a Renewal without Our Lady, and today that one is fragmented beyond repair. Others have experienced a Renewal with Our Lady but have tended more to her than to true reverence toward her Son, Jesus. ONLY if all of us come back to true reverence toward her Son will we really be with her, and then a true Renewal will become unstoppable.
One of these above-mentioned faithful who collects crumbs after Holy Mass is a Deacon who is not only an extraordinary exorcist, but also an innerlocutionary of Our Lady's (these with the supportive guidance and authority of an Archbishop). About half-way through this little document, the author asked this valiant Child of Mary's whether or not Mary wanted the author to continue putting THE DIVINE SUBSTANCE together with the eventual intention of having it published. Our Lady's response was: "Yes, he may go ahead." And well before that, the author once asked this saintly man why he thought he was given the graces that he had. His humble answer was that he really did not know for sure, but that he suspected a combination of the mystical influence of his spiritual director, St. Padre Pio, and that he himself had been gathering up the Eucharistic Jesus in this manner for some thirty years. And when Communicants today, adherent to one or the other of today's two forms of receiving Holy Communion, are either bypassed entirely or even verbally abused by Priests (e.g., being scoffed at for "obsessive behavior"), to which group will they belong? ALWAYS to the group trying their best to adhere to Holy Communion on the tongue while kneeling, and never to the other group. This fact also should tell us something. Whose doing, dear Catholic, is this —Jesus' or Satan's?
FURTHER DISCUSSION
When the all-too-generic argument, "But that (and, we must presume, most of the above) is old-fashioned," is heard, then remind them gently that such a belief is often the seed of many sins of apostasy. The "New Agers" say that "Jesus is old-fashioned," and considering that we are speaking of Him here IN the Divine Substance, that argument, the author sincerely hopes, instantly voids itself. When the argument, "But the Church has allowed it," is heard, remember please, you are the Church, and not the entangled intricacies of disobedient, dishonest and betraying bureaucrats in some far-off and unattainable places. The Church has not "allowed it", it has ONLY under back-handed duress tolerated it, and you are NOT "a true emergency." Or do you perhaps, at some later date, want to become one? When the all-too-democratic argument, "Don't make waves, don't be different, don't be singular. Those may lead you to pride", is heard, remember, to Jesus YOU ARE different, to Jesus YOU ARE singular, and ONLY WITH JESUS do you become free. So, again, OUT OF THE WAY, Satan! To quote a simple and thus lucid thinker who quite obviously, like this author, is not all too impressed with the world-wide Masonic call for counterfeit "equality, brotherhood and liberty" among all the world's people: "The religion of our society is democracy, brother-hood, socialization, conformity, agreement (and) popularity. Today Christian ethics are not as distinctive as Christian faith. Everyone admits the claims of love (in principle, if not in practice), but not everyone admits the claims of faith. Everyone agrees (again, in principle) with Jesus' ethical teachings, but not everyone agrees with His claim to divinity. If only we can classify Christ with other ethical teachers and Christianity with other religions, we will have removed the odium of distinctiveness, the scandal of elitism, and the terror of being right where others are wrong." Like it or not, and even more so than other Christians, we Catholics ARE distinct, we Catholics ARE an elite, we Catholics ARE right; and herein lies THE ENTIRE ISSUE! While it is true that Christ is present in His word, and in the people of God gathered together, and while certainly every living person is truly a Temple of the Trinity, what gives an extraordinary distinction to the Presence of Christ in the Holy Eucharist is that there, as His words state so very exactly, His Presence is The Pledge Of The New Covenant between God and His people. In any culture and at any time, the Pledge of the Covenant MUST be enshrouded in a very distinct reverence! This very distinct reverence toward God is, in any religion and at any time, primarily shown by the act of kneeling toward God while praying to Him. Even the most moderate of all practicing Moslems kneel and pray toward their God five times a day while we Catholics, who today kneel so rarely, are at the same time so prone to worry about our young who today are joining other religions or, just as often, sects whose members even kneel before their so-called Gurus! God hears the others' prayers as He does ours, but if we do not show our love for Him, how true, how heartfelt can our prayers really be? Might we Catholics who over these decades have been pulled away
from kneeling before God not ourselves unknowingly be assisting our youth in their search for this true reverence, for this penitent position of love for God, for which all souls while still here on earth, both young and old, so naturally yearn? We Catholics, the Catholics who have Jesus Himself in every Holy Communion, therefore have no reason at all to even go to Church if we ourselves are not lovingly prepared to kneel before Him.
As the Poor Souls in Purgatory themselves once told Maria Simma: "Many wish to be good Catholics; but to strain for holiness, that seems too much for them! And still God's Holy Church needs truly holy and not somewhat holy men! The tide of ruin is stronger than the mediocre, so how should it be conquered by mediocrity?!"
Only our own holy reverence can conquer the "tide of ruin", so please let us all stop being mediocre!
RENEWED HOPE
The Bishops' Conference of the Philippines has returned to Holy Communion on the tongue due to the increase of sacrilege that had occurred with Communion in the hand.
YET ANOTHER PRAYERFUL OPINION
Hand Communion is an inequity against God that has already badly damaged the unity in, as well as the respect for, our Sacred Catholic Faith.
The so urgent need for this Addendum is in itself more than sufficient proof for the validity of this statement.
Now, rather than talking about it, PRAY ABOUT IT and listen well to your conscience. God put a conscience into every one of us, not a library full of weighty books or the infinite justifications of some influential highbrows. When, as a fruit of much prayer, this God-given conscience becomes more and more well-honed, the first of all most obvious fruits is TRUE REVERENCE. Jesus came, not to make us all equally clever or more alike, but to have us love Him and through Him each other. ONLY with true reverence and love for Him, ONLY when we have understood and begun practicing the First Commandment, will we ever even begin to be able to love one another! That is why it is the First Commandment, and all opposing teachings are simply fraudulent and thus a huge waste of our time. Especially when discussing this topic with western Priests or Bishops, arguing produces only distressed fruits. This discussion is not meant to antagonize western Priests or Bishops, their good parishioners, or anyone else, but here again... Please read, listen, watch, reflect and pray about what Our Lady's Pope is doing! Or did she perhaps not know what she was doing when she chose him?! The Holy Father, when appointing some 30 new Cardinals in 1995, chose almost exclusively men from former `Iron Curtain' countries and from Africa. Did he perhaps have holy reasons for doing so? He most certainly did! And now, pray about it even more.
CONCLUSION When we look at the above names and situations as compared to the vast number of Communicants who today are receiving Holy Communion in the hand, it becomes abundantly clear that this holy issue is far from settled. Now it is left, once again, for Mary's children to give the best example to the whole world, and to follow her where their prayer-lives lead them — closer to Jesus in an ever more reverent manner. The evidence, the undeniably holy evidence, is not only strong, it is truly overwhelming, and that is overwhelmingly in favor of the traditional form Holy Communion on the tongue while kneeling. And who is it who constitutes that other much, much smaller group of, yes, dissidents? While this situation is not one where the majority automatically prevails, we will, of course, in the end have to leave that to Jesus. But one thing is still certain, Jesus gives us the Saints and holy mystics as role models, and not so that we then consider them "old-fashioned", "out in vogue" or even
"misguided". Their graces were given to them because they had been so virtuous and not, as so many people today seem to think, democratically or, God forbid, even randomly or equally.
The author does not in any way or form suggest that all the faithful who receive Communion in the hand are, on the other hand, themselves necessarily misguided, for he knows quite well that there are holy individuals among them, as there are anywhere else. But he does, however, suggest that they haven't been guided at all, and that is why he has taken the time to write THE DIVINE SUBSTANCE. When we merge what Our Lady told Marthe Robin about the demise of Freemasonry with the fact that it certainly seems as though it was, in fact, the Freemasons who brought about the "false opinion" in spreading Hand Communion, we may also conclude, already now, that when Our Lady does finally conquer Freemasonry that Hand Communion will also have fallen away for the second time. Let's take her numerous hints and nudges already today, rather than waiting until something cataclysmic occurs. Moreover, when names such as Augustine, Francis, Thomas Aquinas, Catherine of Sienna, Bridget of Sweden; Leo XIII, Pius X, Jean-Marie Vianney, Therese Neumann, Marthe Robin, Katharina Emmerich, Bl. Padre Pio, Lanciano, Mother Teresa, Maria Simma, Fatima, Garabandal, Akita and Medugorje roll by our ears, it can only make sense that we should listen well, learn from them all, follow and imitate them all now. In not doing so we are, by this point, blatantly admitting our callousness toward the Eucharistic Jesus. Wouldn't Our Lady greatly prefer that ALL her contemporary children also listen, trust, imitate and thus privately as well as officially act upon the wishes of her Holy Father in Rome, and therein possibly join the ranks of these above names? As the Medugorje visionaries testified about Purgatory in January of 1983: "The majority of people go to Purgatory, many go to Hell and a small number go directly to Heaven" LET US ALL GO DIRECTLY TO HEAVEN! Nicky Eltz

rp

Postscript

While still putting the final touches on THE DIVINE SUBSTANCE, the author received a letter from a gifted Australian Franciscan Priest who is also very active among Charismatics. Two thirds of the way through the letter he suddenly wrote: “I do not know why I am hearing this, but, ‘Show many Priests how to be Priests.’ Are you by any chance considering the Priesthood?” “No,” responded the author in due hast, “but I am writing a piece on the confusion that circles the proper form of receiving Holy Communion.” Those of us who say we listen to charismatic Priests ought to take this remark very seriously.
The author published THE DIVINE SUBSTANCE without the sanctioning of any Parish Office or any Bishop and so it, of course, remains unofficial wherever it is read. It only represents the well-founded and prayer-assisted opinion of its author and his friends. If this little document brings extra dimensions onto the author’s cross, he accepts it, and hopefully without whimpering, for his love for Christ, for His Mother, and all their Parish Offices; and therefore, so be it.

INSTRUCTIONS

Now that you have so courageously risked being better informed than you were prior to having read THE DIVINE SUBSTANCE, the Author believes Our Lady herself would advise the following:

Always move gently, yet, at the same time, persistently and always ONLY one step at a time.

Take this issue first into your own prayers.
Only then take it gently into your families.
Only then take it gently into your prayer-groups.
Only then take it gently, and ONLY AS A PRAYER-GROUP, to your Priests. Search out older and thus more experienced Priests with a rich prayer-life already behind them. Forget, for now, all female ‘eucharistic ministers’ and any Priests under 50. Only go up the spiritual ladder, not the bureaucratic ladder.
Ask them to confirm what is written here. They can, that is, IF they want to. Come armed with other books that you have collected from among your private Marian libraries.
Only once you have found equally courageous and active friends among your good Priests, then ask them to take this issue to your Bishops. Suggestion: Perhaps have representatives of your prayer-groups accompany your Priests to your Bishop. Watch out for satanic interfereance, and to deflect hat call upon ST. MICHAEL ALONG WITH OUR LADY. ALWAYS help your Priests in doing things, like this, that can become somewhat difficult. Go only armed with prayer! Again, always go gently.
Along with your Priests, ask your Bishops now to confirm the contents of this booklet. Yes, THEY CAN, that is, IF they want to.
Once you have found amenable spiritual direction in this regard, write about it yourselves and then spread it in your bulletins and Marian journels.
Keep praying and…

MARY WILL HELP YOU,

FOR IN TAKING THE ABOVE PATH

YOU ARE HELPING HER SON!

June 16, 2015

Well this is one heck of a text dump. :popcorn:

June 16, 2015

Pick up a copy of "Dominus Est.". Read it and reflect on it.

http://www.amazon.com/Dominus-Reflections-Bishop-Central-Communion/dp/0977884619

"The Bishop's book, Dominus Est, was published by the Vatican's own library in Italian."

June 16, 2015

TL;DR but I suspect I still agree with the conclusions.

Pick up a copy of "Dominus Est.". Read it and reflect on it.

Yup.

April 12, 2020

Thank you for this golden writing the whole world should see! God bless!

Communion in the hand is a sin and sacrilege!

April 12, 2020

6 hours ago, LittleDaughterOfGod said:

Communion in the hand is a sin and sacrilege!

Oh well... nothing wrong with conceiving the communion on the tongue, but receiving in the hand seemingly is not a sin nor a sacrilege, otherwise it wouldn't be allowed in general.

On 6/16/2015 at 6:10 AM, Charbel said:

"But the Church has allowed it," is heard, remember please, you are the Church, and not the entangled intricacies of disobedient, dishonest and betraying bureaucrats in some far-off and unattainable places.

On 6/16/2015 at 6:10 AM, Charbel said:

With "Memoriale Domini" Pope Paul VI. allowed the bishops conferences of Germany and France, and this permission is valide to date, so that both forms of communication exist in central Europe.

I hope you understand that your statement is slightly offensive.

I'd also recommend a broader look into the traditions of the church:

"Infact, oral communion is a practice that has been common in the church for many centuries. However, the associated assumption that it was older than hand communion would be wrong. It was not until the end of the first millennium that the church made the transition from hand to mouth communion on the knees. For example, for the Gallican rite - the liturgy in the Franconian empire that lasted until the 8th century - a sermon by Archbishop Caesarius von Arles (470-542) refers to hand communion: "All men wash their hands before stepping up to the altar, and the women keep a clean cloth, whereupon they receive the body of Christ." A source from the 8th century said about the reception of communion in the Roman-Franconian rite: "Then the bishop descends from his seat and gives the communion to the people who hold his hands out to him ..." Until well into the 9th century, it was common to receive communion standing in the hand - and in both forms."

(translated from an article to be found here https://www.katholisch.de/artikel/16706-handkommunion-oder-mundkommunion)

Btw Pope Francis seemingly also confirms receiving on the hand - he re-allowed it for pontifical masses after Benedikt XVI. banned it for rather practical reasons.

As Benedikt XVI writes in 2006 in "God is near - the eucharistic center of our lives":

"First of all, I would like to say that both postures are possible and ask all priests to exercise the tolerance that recognizes each decision,"

- which I'd hope you do too. Many thanks.

April 13, 2020

10 hours ago, Lea said:

"But the Church has allowed it," is heard, remember please, you are the Church, and not the entangled intricacies of disobedient, dishonest and betraying bureaucrats in some far-off and unattainable places.

This is the exact sentence that follows... "The Church has not "allowed it", it has ONLY under back-handed duress tolerated it, and you are NOT "a true emergency." "(exactly copied from post)

In regards to this comment in Charbel's post, I completely agree with... it is addressing people who think that hand communion is not a sacrilege or an offense to our Lord... this post never directly said that it is a sin or sacrilege, but all the evidence is pointing in that direction...

On 6/16/2015 at 12:10 AM, Charbel said:

the Freemasons who brought about the "false opinion" in spreading Hand Communion, we may also conclude, already now, that when Our Lady does finally conquer Freemasonry that Hand Communion will also have fallen away for the second time.

10 hours ago, Lea said:

but receiving in the hand seemingly is not a sin nor a sacrilege, otherwise it wouldn't be allowed in general.

Thanks for the kind comment and suggestion This is one of the many reasons why I believe that it is a sacrilege...

On 6/16/2015 at 12:10 AM, Charbel said:

Our Lady warned of a great peril that, because of false doctrine and heresy, would befall the Church. Through Ida Our Lady asked that Rome be made aware that this error would have its origin in Holland. *

I can see where you are going, but one of the reasons I said this, is because Maria Simma, a mystic of the Catholic Church, was very much against the practice, and she herself said, as noted in Charbel's post...

"most of whom were in Purgatory due to spreading the practice of Communion in the hand or similar irreverent practices. Maria calls Hand Communion, "the work of the devil" (copied and quoted directly from post)

Therefore, partaking in the work of the devil to undermine the true presence of Jesus in the Eucharist is a sin... I am not saying it is a venial or a mortal sin, since that depends upon the condition of the reciever of Jesus in the Eucharist.

Why did these souls mentioned above go to purgatory? To get cleansed from their sins regarding improper Eucharistic reception and offenses. We must pray for them

On 6/16/2015 at 12:10 AM, Charbel said:

It is also reported that when a group of Bishops, while visiting Mother Teresa in Calcutta, asked her what, in her opinion, the worst evil in the crisis of the Church was, she answered, surprising them all, that it was the "modern form of receiving Communion.

This "modern form" consists of hand communion. I have done research on this topic, and still am doing so, and I even have prayed about this... my conscience is clearly telling me that it is a sacrilege that deeply offends our Lord, which must be avoided as much as possible.

10 hours ago, Lea said:

Therefore, I believe all Catholics should recieve communion on the tongue only, and kneeling, if physically possible (the elderly cannot kneel and get up easily so it is ok to stand in certain difficult cases...) I myself kneel and recieve communion on the tongue only, and yes, I was forced to recieve Communion in the hand when I was at a Catholic school... ever since I stopped, I felt more love toward the Eucharist and I could experience more personal miracles in my life... I agree with this post by Charbel completely, and I have read through the post carefully abd throughly with discernment... which is an answer to my prayers regarding this topic.

*I refuse to judge or criticize anyone who opposes me in regards to this topic, or force anyone to believe what I am saying...

"Love one another..." Jesus says

Another note: Recieving Communion on the tongue in a state of mortal sin is a graver sin, than recieving Communion in the Hand in a state of venial sin.

Our heart matters (inside) more than outward appearances... outer appearances are only a reflection of the inside...those with a good heart who recieve communion in the hand will hopefully sooner (or later) realize that communion on the tongue pleases the Lord more, and will switch to that practice...

I encourage you to read this post by Charbel carefully, too, and I am open for another friendly discussion regarding this topic...

Blessings!

Vivo Christo Rey!

Fiat!!!

Thy Kingdom come, Thy Will be done, on Earth, as it is in Heaven

April 13, 2020

In the Church approved apparation of Our Lady of Akita, Mother Mary said this:

Our Lady of Akita told Sister Sasagawa to receive Holy Communion only on the tongue, never in the hand.

https://mysticpost.com/2018/10/church-approved-prophecy-and-the-virgin-marys-mysterious-number-101-a-clue-to-todays-church-crisis-and-the-way-out/amp/

April 13, 2020

16 hours ago, LittleDaughterOfGod said:

In the Church approved apparation of Our Lady of Akita, Mother Mary said this:

Our Lady of Akita told Sister Sasagawa to receive Holy Communion only on the tongue, never in the hand.

https://mysticpost.com/2018/10/church-approved-prophecy-and-the-virgin-marys-mysterious-number-101-a-clue-to-todays-church-crisis-and-the-way-out/amp/

"Question:

Are any apparitions ever considered dogma?

Answer:

No. Apparitions and locutions are considered “private revelation,” and while some have been recognized by the Church, they do not belong to the deposit of faith. Catholics are not bound to believe Church-approved private revelations. The Catechism explains the role of private revelation as follows:

It is not their role to improve or complete Christ’s definitive revelation but to help live more fully by it in a certain period of history. Guided by the magisterium of the Church, the sensus fidelium knows how to discern and welcome in these revelations whatever constitutes an authentic call of Christ or his saints to the Church. Christian faith cannot accept “revelations” that claim to surpass or correct the revelation of which Christ is the fulfillment, as is the case in certain non-Christian religions and also in certain recent sects that base themselves on such “revelations.” (Catechism of the Catholic Church 67)"

Source https://www.catholic.com/qa/are-any-apparitions-ever-considered-dogma

April 13, 2020

39 minutes ago, tinytherese said:

"Question:

Are any apparitions ever considered dogma?

Answer:

No. Apparitions and locutions are considered “private revelation,” and while some have been recognized by the Church, they do not belong to the deposit of faith. Catholics are not bound to believe Church-approved private revelations. The Catechism explains the role of private revelation as follows:

It is not their role to improve or complete Christ’s definitive revelation but to help live more fully by it in a certain period of history. Guided by the magisterium of the Church, the sensus fidelium knows how to discern and welcome in these revelations whatever constitutes an authentic call of Christ or his saints to the Church. Christian faith cannot accept “revelations” that claim to surpass or correct the revelation of which Christ is the fulfillment, as is the case in certain non-Christian religions and also in certain recent sects that base themselves on such “revelations.” (Catechism of the Catholic Church 67)"

Source https://www.catholic.com/qa/are-any-apparitions-ever-considered-dogma

Yes, the CCC is always true. Thank you for posting that

I agree with Charbel's post on "The Divine Substance," and Our Lady of Akita's apparation

God Bless

Edited April 13, 2020 by LittleDaughterOfGod
to improve response

April 13, 2020

1 hour ago, LittleDaughterOfGod said:

Yes, the CCC is always true. Thank you for posting that

I agree with Charbel's post on "The Divine Substance," and Our Lady of Akita's apparation

God Bless

Referring to this, I only believe in the messages (private revelations) that are 1. Church-approved and 2. do not contradict the CCC.

That is why I believe in the messages of Our Lady of Akita in reference to this topic. Yes, it is NOT a dogma, like how books written by the saints are not the Bible, or above the Holy Bible.

HOWEVER, I see both Saint books and Church-approved apparations as friendly and helpful hints and reminders from Heaven on how to love God and please him as much as possible.

Hope this clarifies any confusion

God Bless

-LittleDaughterOfGod

May 3, 2020

On 4/12/2020 at 2:34 AM, LittleDaughterOfGod said:

Communion in the hand is a sin and sacrilege!

I take it back- Since it is not a sin in all circumstances, it is certainly displeasing to the Lord- not very reverent

Edited May 3, 2020 by LittleDaughterOfGod

May 3, 2020

35 minutes ago, LittleDaughterOfGod said:

HAND COMMUNION IS NOT A SIN IF ONE DOES IT IN A STATE OF EXTREME EMERGENCY, OR IN A RESPECTFUL MANNER, NOT KNOWING THAT COMMUNION ON THE TONGUE AND KNEELING IS BETTER and more pleasing to the Lord.....

Please forgive me for my erroneuos statement reharding hand communion, sacrilege, and sin above.... it is not a sin in all circumstances- it is only a sin if you recieve-tongue included-, in a state of mortal sin...

The Catholic Church's preferred way is kneeling and on the tongue...

Hand communion is NOT intristically (by its very nature) evil. Just remember it as not pleasing to the Lord.

Many Saints and Blesseds recieved communion on the tongue and kneeling...

we should too

On 4/12/2020 at 9:19 AM, Lea said:

Oh well... nothing wrong with conceiving the communion on the tongue, but receiving in the hand seemingly is not a sin nor a sacrilege, otherwise it wouldn't be allowed in general.

I now realize you are right According to the teachings of the Catholic Church, revieving Holy Communion in a state of mortal sin is a sacrilege.

Communion on the tongue is more respectful- it pleases the Lord more and it is the Church's preffered way.

The Divine Substance - On the Subject of Hand Communion

Recommended Posts

Charbel

Link to comment

Share on other sites

truthfinder

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Credo in Deum

Link to comment

Share on other sites

puellapaschalis

Link to comment

Share on other sites

LittleDaughterOfGod

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Lea

Link to comment

Share on other sites

LittleDaughterOfGod

Link to comment

Share on other sites

LittleDaughterOfGod

Link to comment

Share on other sites

tinytherese

Link to comment

Share on other sites

LittleDaughterOfGod

Link to comment

Share on other sites

LittleDaughterOfGod

Link to comment

Share on other sites

LittleDaughterOfGod

Link to comment

Share on other sites

LittleDaughterOfGod

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

Create an account

Sign in