Roman Crucifixion & Theology of The Cross

[BarbTherese]

This account of Roman crucifixion is not at all for the faint-hearted.  This account over 9 pages comes from Catholic Culture and a quite reliable and sound Catholic resource.  It also contains quite disturbing drawings.

http://www.catholicculture.org/culture/liturgicalyear/overviews/seasons/lent/passion1.cfm

SOURCES

The source material concerning Christ's death comprises a body of literature and not a physical body or its skeletal remains. Accordingly, the credibility of any discussion of Jesus' death will be determined primarily by the credibility of one's sources. For this review, the source material includes the writings of ancient Christian and non-Christian authors, the writings of modern authors, and the Shroud of Turin. (1-40) Using the legal-historical method of scientific investigation, (27) scholars have established the reliability and accuracy of the ancient manuscripts. (26,27,29,31)

The most extensive and detailed descriptions of the life and death of Jesus are to be found in the New Testament gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John. (1) The other 23 books of the New Testament support but do not expand on the details recorded in the gospels. Contemporary Christian, Jewish, and Roman authors provide additional insight concerning the first-century Jewish and Roman legal systems and the details of scourging and crucifixion. (5) Seneca, Livy, Plutarch, and others refer to crucifixion practices in their works. (8,28) Specifically, Jesus (or his crucifixion) is mentioned by the Roman historians Cornelius Tacitus, Pliny the Younger, and Suetonius, by non-Roman historians Thallus and Phlegon, by the satirist Lucian of Samosata, by the Jewish Talmud, and by the Jewish historian Flavius Josephus, although the authenticity of portions of the latter is problematic. (26) The Shroud of Turin is considered by many to represent the actual burial cloth of Jesus, (22) and several publications concerning the medical aspects of his death draw conclusions from this assumption. (5,11) The Shroud of Turin and recent archaeological findings provide valuable information concerning Roman crucifixion practices. (22-24) The interpretations of modern writers, based on a knowledge of science and medicine not available in the first century, may offer additional insight concerning the possible mechanisms of Jesus' death. (2,17) When taken in concert, certain facts – the extensive and early testimony of both Christian proponents and opponents, and their universal acceptance of Jesus as a true historical figure; the ethic of the Gospel writers, and the shortness of the time interval between the events and the extant manuscripts; and the confirmation of the Gospel accounts by historians and archaeological findings (26,27) – ensure a reliable testimony from which a modern medical interpretation of Jesus' death may be made.

 

For theological type of reflections:

"The Why of Jesus' Death: A Pauline Perspective" (Source: Catholic Online) http://www.catholic.org/featured/headline.php?ID=6135

"The Importance of Christology: The Theology of The Cross" - Pope Benedict XVI (Source: Catholic Culture) http://www.catholicculture.org/culture/library/view.cfm?recnum=8573

[Catlick]

When I attended the Spiritual Exercises they played a tape of a Catholic physician detailing the effects of crucifixion on the human body. Horrifying and crucial in fully understanding what Our Lord suffered.

[BarbTherese]

Indeed!