Ice_nine Posted September 23, 2014 Share Posted September 23, 2014 I believe this particular black mass was going to be fully-clothed as to remain within the law. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Basilisa Marie Posted September 23, 2014 Share Posted September 23, 2014 Yeah they modified what "traditionally" happens at a black mass. It's terrible, and disturbing that civic authorities would let them use a public space. Would they do the same for another religious group? Furthermore it shows that they have a gross misunderstanding of what a black mass is, it exists purely to insult, degrade, and otherwise attack Catholic liturgy and Catholicism itself. Allowing it on public property is an act of gross intolerance, not tolerance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhuturePriest Posted September 23, 2014 Author Share Posted September 23, 2014 :shock: How in the world is it not illegal to do that in a public building?!?!?! My response exactly. That's really sickening. Yeah they modified what "traditionally" happens at a black mass. It's terrible, and disturbing that civic authorities would let them use a public space. Would they do the same for another religious group? Furthermore it shows that they have a gross misunderstanding of what a black mass is, it exists purely to insult, degrade, and otherwise attack Catholic liturgy and Catholicism itself. Allowing it on public property is an act of gross intolerance, not tolerance. This is indeed correct. They modified several things to be in accordance with State law. So there was no sex or anything of that sort, they replaced urine with water (they use urine in place of holy water as a mockery), and they changed several other things. However, they still desecrated a Host which they claim wasn't consecrated, but really you can't believe them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhuturePriest Posted September 23, 2014 Author Share Posted September 23, 2014 Yeah they modified what "traditionally" happens at a black mass. It's terrible, and disturbing that civic authorities would let them use a public space. Would they do the same for another religious group? Furthermore it shows that they have a gross misunderstanding of what a black mass is, it exists purely to insult, degrade, and otherwise attack Catholic liturgy and Catholicism itself. Allowing it on public property is an act of gross intolerance, not tolerance. I wonder if they would let us use the Civic Center if we had an "Anti-Homosexual And Black People Mass"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truthfinder Posted September 23, 2014 Share Posted September 23, 2014 As much as the news cast and some of those involved said it was just a way of pointing out hypocrisy, the satanist leader (the one dressed up in bishop's garb), knew exactly what he was doing. He wasn't talking in symbols, he knows exactly what the Eucharist is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhuturePriest Posted September 23, 2014 Author Share Posted September 23, 2014 As much as the news cast and some of those involved said it was just a way of pointing out hypocrisy, the satanist leader (the one dressed up in bishop's garb), knew exactly what he was doing. He wasn't talking in symbols, he knows exactly what the Eucharist is. He said so himself in the interview. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now