Credo in Deum Posted September 15, 2014 Share Posted September 15, 2014 That reaks of white privilege and naivete. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marigold Posted September 15, 2014 Share Posted September 15, 2014 Voila, I just discovered the topic that is too emotive for me to be able to write anything coherent about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anomaly Posted September 15, 2014 Share Posted September 15, 2014 [url="http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/09/13/details-emerge-in-adrian-peterson-child-abuse-case-im-all-tearing-that-butt-up-when-needed/"]http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/09/13/details-emerge-in-adrian-peterson-child-abuse-case-im-all-tearing-that-butt-up-when-needed/[/url Is it just me, or do others think it's wrong to put pictures up of this child in an ongoing investigation. Isn't that an invasion of the child's privacy? Are these pictures of Petersons son? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Semper Catholic Posted September 16, 2014 Share Posted September 16, 2014 http://deadspin.com/adrian-peterson-accused-of-beating-another-son-leaving-1635102727/all So apparently AP also injured another one of his kids sometime last year. Yeah let's let him off with a warning good idea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
veritasluxmea Posted September 16, 2014 Share Posted September 16, 2014 Is it just me, or do others think it's wrong to put pictures up of this child in an ongoing investigation. Isn't that an invasion of the child's privacy? Are these pictures of Petersons son? Yeah, that's inappropriate... we don't need proof it's abuse. That's for the cops and the jury. The public doesn't need these photos. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Semper Catholic Posted September 16, 2014 Share Posted September 16, 2014 Yeah, that's inappropriate... we don't need proof it's abuse. That's for the cops and the jury. The public doesn't need these photos. When the public "doesn't see the photos" Ray Rice gets put in a special diversion program. Public figures play by different rules. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
veritasluxmea Posted September 16, 2014 Share Posted September 16, 2014 (edited) When the public "doesn't see the photos" Ray Rice gets put in a special diversion program. Public figures play by different rules. Not sure what you're talking about and to lazy to google it. Still think it violates the kid's privacy and I still think the public doesn't have a right/doesn't need proof of this poor kid's abuse/mistreatment. Edited September 16, 2014 by veritasluxmea Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now