Credo in Deum Posted August 11, 2014 Share Posted August 11, 2014 fixed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OriginalSin Posted August 11, 2014 Share Posted August 11, 2014 fixed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Credo in Deum Posted August 11, 2014 Share Posted August 11, 2014 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OriginalSin Posted August 11, 2014 Share Posted August 11, 2014 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Credo in Deum Posted August 11, 2014 Share Posted August 11, 2014 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OriginalSin Posted August 11, 2014 Share Posted August 11, 2014 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhuturePriest Posted August 11, 2014 Author Share Posted August 11, 2014 Double negative. Classy. Double negatives are actually acceptable in the English language. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Hierophant Posted August 11, 2014 Share Posted August 11, 2014 So can I just ask... what is the origin of the name Fetus Priest? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhuturePriest Posted August 11, 2014 Author Share Posted August 11, 2014 So can I just ask... what is the origin of the name Fetus Priest? My name for the past 2 years was FuturePriest. However, everyone else here is ancient, whereas I am young, so they all called me "Fetus". Several days ago Dust changed my name to FetusPriest, and it seems it's going to stick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Catherine Therese Posted August 12, 2014 Share Posted August 12, 2014 Double negatives are actually acceptable in the English language. You say that like you're surprised ;-).In the usage that I badged above as "classy," where the negatives were distributed across separate words, that is true.Where the double negative occurs in prefixes or suffixes of the same word, this is NOT true.IRREGARDLESS IS NOT A WORD, PEOPLE.Just sayin' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhuturePriest Posted August 12, 2014 Author Share Posted August 12, 2014 You say that like you're surprised ;-). In the usage that I badged above as "classy," where the negatives were distributed across separate words, that is true. Where the double negative occurs in prefixes or suffixes of the same word, this is NOT true. IRREGARDLESS IS NOT A WORD, PEOPLE. Just sayin' I have found nothing in this post which I disagree with. This has a Nihil Obstat of FP approval. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nihil Obstat Posted August 12, 2014 Share Posted August 12, 2014 Of course irregardless is a word. You just used it. It just happens to be a nonstandard word - currently not accepted in most cases - and best to avoid when precise communication is important. English is a little bit like a child. We love and nurture it into being, and once it gains gross motor skills, it starts going exactly where we don’t want it to go: it heads right for the [...] light sockets. We put it in nice clothes and tell it to make friends, and it comes home covered in mud, with its underwear on its head and someone else’s socks on its feet. We ask it to clean up or to take out the garbage, and instead it hollers at us that we don’t run its life, man. Then it stomps off to its room to listen to The Smiths in the dark. Everything we’ve done to and for English is for its own good, we tell it (angrily, as it slouches in its chair and writes “irregardless†all over itself in ballpoint pen). This is to help you grow into a language people will respect! Are you listening to me? Why aren’t you listening to me?? Like well-adjusted children eventually do, English lives its own life. We can tell it to clean itself up and act more like one of the Classical languages (I bet Latin doesn’t sneak German in through its bedroom window, does it?). We can threaten, cajole, wheedle, beg, yell, throw tantrums, and start learning French instead. But no matter what we do, we will never really be the boss of it. And that, frankly, is what makes it so beautiful. -Kory Stamper The problem with defending the purity of the English language is that English is about as pure as a [woman of great disrepute]. We don't just borrow words; on occasion, English has pursued other languages down alleyways to beat them unconscious and rifle their pockets for new vocabulary. - James D. Nicoll http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=4276 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Credo in Deum Posted August 12, 2014 Share Posted August 12, 2014 Festizio. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Catherine Therese Posted August 12, 2014 Share Posted August 12, 2014 The paradigm underlying modern linguistics is akin to a distinctly Camus-flavoured brand of existentialism. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now