Lil Red Posted August 1, 2014 Share Posted August 1, 2014 yeah definitely. what'd be even better is if they locked both people in their own get-along phorum lol ROFL! If 8 people really did nominate me, then I'd just feel ganged up on. Maybe this is dUSt's way of "helping" me grow in humility. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ash Wednesday Posted August 1, 2014 Share Posted August 1, 2014 I think Dust should make it so that the people who suggested y'all's names have to identify themselves here and then interact until everything is happy and sunshiney. :| I'm sure that there is probably some biblical support for that -- seems to me that Christian charity and fraternal correction has always been meant to be face to face and directly first and foremost...doing it anonymously seems cowardly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
veritasluxmea Posted August 1, 2014 Share Posted August 1, 2014 (edited) I think Dust should make it so that the people who suggested y'all's names have to identify themselves here and then interact until everything is happy and sunshiney. :| If people had to identify themselves, no one would suggest anyone's names, and we'd be right back where we started. Maybe a mod should give a reason like a post example, or majority vote. That might be helpful to people, or something. What do I know, I'm just a noob. Edited August 1, 2014 by veritasluxmea Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Perigrina Posted August 1, 2014 Share Posted August 1, 2014 If people had to identify themselves, no one would suggest anyone's names, and we'd be right back where we started. Maybe a mod should give a reason like a post example, or majority vote. That might be helpful to people. Yes, I would find that helpful. If I have to go through all my faults it could take forever to figure out which one(s) got me in here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ash Wednesday Posted August 1, 2014 Share Posted August 1, 2014 If people had to identify themselves, no one would suggest anyone's names, and we'd be right back where we started. That's possible. I don't mean to call anyone who made a nomination a coward. I would just hope that there'd be a halfway point between no interaction and voting someone out... anyway I'm off to dinner and drinks, cya Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maximillion Posted August 1, 2014 Share Posted August 1, 2014 If people had to identify themselves, no one would suggest anyone's names, Oh, so it's OK as long as the accuser remains anonymous, whereas the accused is blazoned for all the world to see. There is something fundamentally wrong in that. Everyone deserves to know who is accusing them, and why. I suspect that had people known in advance that THIS is what would happen, then maybe they would not have nominated anyone. It was a bit rich asking us to nominate then putting those nominated into a ghetto, without any of us knowing in advance. That's not okay. I understand dUst's very evident frustration, but this, NO. It is public shaming. I don't like it, and I am out of here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Perigrina Posted August 1, 2014 Share Posted August 1, 2014 Oh, so it's OK as long as the accuser remains anonymous, whereas the accused is blazoned for all the world to see. There is something fundamentally wrong in that. Everyone deserves to know who is accusing them, and why. I suspect that had people known in advance that THIS is what would happen, then maybe they would not have nominated anyone. It was a bit rich asking us to nominate then putting those nominated into a ghetto, without any of us knowing in advance. That's not okay. I understand dUst's very evident frustration, but this, NO. It is public shaming. I don't like it, and I am out of here. Please don't go. You are such a good poster. We will work through this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nihil Obstat Posted August 1, 2014 Share Posted August 1, 2014 Oh, so it's OK as long as the accuser remains anonymous, whereas the accused is blazoned for all the world to see. There is something fundamentally wrong in that. Everyone deserves to know who is accusing them, and why. I suspect that had people known in advance that THIS is what would happen, then maybe they would not have nominated anyone. It was a bit rich asking us to nominate then putting those nominated into a ghetto, without any of us knowing in advance. That's not okay. I understand dUst's very evident frustration, but this, NO. It is public shaming. I don't like it, and I am out of here. I assumed people were going to be permabanned. This is not much fun for the people stuck here, but it is better than what I expected. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
veritasluxmea Posted August 1, 2014 Share Posted August 1, 2014 Everyone deserves to know who is accusing them, and why. I agree with you on the why part. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Perigrina Posted August 1, 2014 Share Posted August 1, 2014 I agree with you on the why part. I don't know why anybody sent in my name, but I supported dust's decision to purge the phorum when he announced it. That support would have been pretty meaningless if I only meant it as long as I was not one of the people affected. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ancilla Domini Posted August 1, 2014 Share Posted August 1, 2014 I don't know why anybody sent in my name... Neither do I. XD I was wondering that myself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lil Red Posted August 1, 2014 Share Posted August 1, 2014 ummmm this is the party thread?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Perigrina Posted August 1, 2014 Share Posted August 1, 2014 ummmm this is the party thread?? I am not much of a party girl. Sorry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lil Red Posted August 1, 2014 Share Posted August 1, 2014 :paco: :paco: :paco: :paco: :paco: :paco: :paco: :drunks: :drunks: :drunks: :drunks: :paco: :paco: :paco: :paco: :paco: :paco: :paco: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
franciscanheart Posted August 1, 2014 Share Posted August 1, 2014 I think Dust should make it so that the people who suggested y'all's names have to identify themselves here and then interact until everything is happy and sunshiney. :| yeah definitely. what'd be even better is if they locked both people in their own get-along phorum lol I was going to suggest what Aloysius suggested. Kind of... I think both the people nominated and the people doing the nominating should end up here -- to fight it out or arm wrestle or act like adults... Figure it out or stay in Purge-atory forever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now