add Posted May 13, 2014 Share Posted May 13, 2014 http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2014/05/13/warren-buffet-donates-12-billion-to-abortion-groups/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arfink Posted May 13, 2014 Share Posted May 13, 2014 Probably because he has so much money and literally doesn't know what to do with it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4588686 Posted May 13, 2014 Share Posted May 13, 2014 What a remarkably bad article. NARAL doesn't 'do' abortions at all. They do promote the idea that abortion should be legal. Planned Parenthood does provide abortions however this is small percentage of the total health services they provide. So to say conclude that 'Imagine the equivalent of the lives of 2.7 million children snuffed out to serve the whims of the third richest man in the world. Most people would say that’s a story, most likely several.' is completely intellectually dishonest. This is just a story where basic critical thinking should come into play. What does he mean by 'abortion groups.' His definition encompasses both NARAL (which provides no medical services at all) and Planned Parenthood (which does provide abortion along with a host of other health ervices). When he donates to Planned Parenthood is he donating the Foundation? The author provides no break down of the numbers or basic defintions about the terms that he is throwing around. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lilllabettt Posted May 13, 2014 Share Posted May 13, 2014 rich people love to pay for poor people's abortions. its makes the whole process way more efficient. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4588686 Posted May 14, 2014 Share Posted May 14, 2014 rich people love to pay for poor people's abortions. its makes the whole process way more efficient. That's a pretty gross accusation to make. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winchester Posted May 14, 2014 Share Posted May 14, 2014 Keeps down the riff raff's population, what what. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
add Posted May 14, 2014 Author Share Posted May 14, 2014 What a remarkably bad article. NARAL doesn't 'do' abortions at all. They do promote the idea that abortion should be legal. Planned Parenthood does provide abortions however this is small percentage of the total health services they provide. So to say conclude that 'Imagine the equivalent of the lives of 2.7 million children snuffed out to serve the whims of the third richest man in the world. Most people would say that’s a story, most likely several.' is completely intellectually dishonest. This is just a story where basic critical thinking should come into play. What does he mean by 'abortion groups.' His definition encompasses both NARAL (which provides no medical services at all) and Planned Parenthood (which does provide abortion along with a host of other health ervices). When he donates to Planned Parenthood is he donating the Foundation? The author provides no break down of the numbers or basic defintions about the terms that he is throwing around. NARAL and planned parenthood sole purpose is to eliminate the surplus (poor) population. Warren Buffett would make a good Ebenezer Scrooge http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QP0B8hrOo0Y Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4588686 Posted May 14, 2014 Share Posted May 14, 2014 NARAL and planned parenthood sole purpose is to eliminate the surplus (poor) population. That is not true. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KnightofChrist Posted May 14, 2014 Share Posted May 14, 2014 Keeps down the riff raff's population, what what. rich people love to pay for poor people's abortions. its makes the whole process way more efficient. Which is way there are more Abortion mills in poorer more urban neighborhoods. To control the numbers of the 'feeble minded'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4588686 Posted May 14, 2014 Share Posted May 14, 2014 Which is way there are more Abortion mills in poorer more urban neighborhoods. To control the numbers of the 'feeble minded'. http://www.tbd.com/blogs/amanda-hess/2011/01/abortion-clinics-are-not-concentrated-in-black-neighborhoods-7516.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KnightofChrist Posted May 14, 2014 Share Posted May 14, 2014 NYC: More Black Babies Killed by Abortion Than Born (CNSNews.com) – In 2012, there were more black babies killed by abortion (31,328) in New York City than were born there (24,758), and the black children killed comprised 42.4% of the total number of abortions in the Big Apple, according to a report by the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene. The report is entitled, Summary of Vital Statistics 2012 The City of New York, Pregnancy Outcomes, and was prepared by the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Office of Vital Statistics. (See Pregnancy Outcomes NYC Health 2012.pdf) Table 1 of the report presents the total number of live births, spontaneous terminations (miscarriages), and induced terminations (abortions) for women in different age brackets between 15 and 49 years of age. The table also breaks that data down by race – Hispanic, Asian and Pacific Islander, Non-Hispanic White, Non-Hispanic Black – and also by borough of residence: Manhattan, Bronx, Brooklyn, Queens, Staten Island. The numbers show that in 2012, there were 31,328 induced terminations (abortions) among non-Hispanic black women in New York City. That same year, there were 24,758 live births for non-Hispanic black women in New York City. There were 6,570 more abortions than live births of black children. In total, there were 73,815 abortions, which means the 31,328 black babies aborted comprised 42.4% of the total abortions. For Hispanic women, there were 22,917 abortions in New York City in 2012, which is 31% of the total abortions. abortion Black and Hispanic abortions combined, 54,245 babies, is 73% of the total abortions in the Big Apple in 2012. The number of non-Hispanic white abortions was 9,704, and the number of Asian and Pacific Islander abortions was 4,493. The total number of live births in New York City in 2012 for women ages 15-49 was 123,231. That is a rate of 14.8 live births per 1,000 women, which is the lowest rate since 1979, according to the report. In addition, the live birth rate (per 1,000 women) has declined 3.9% since 2003, when it was a 15.4 rate, states the report. (See Pregnancy Outcomes NYC Health 2012.pdf) In addition, while there were 73,815 abortions in New York City in 2012, the rate of abortions per 1,000 women is down 8.6% since 2011, according to the report. Although the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) have not published their abortion statistics for 2011 or 2012 yet, they do have data for 2010. (See Table 12.) In the CDC’s numbers, there were 38,574 black babies killed by abortion in New York City in 2010; Hispanic babies aborted, 27,112; white babies killed by abortion, 9,220; and “other†aborted, 5,368. The total abortions in New York City in 2010 “reported by known race/ethnicity†were 80,274, according to the CDC. - See more at: http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/michael-w-chapman/nyc-more-black-babies-killed-abortion-born#sthash.JXeqk144.hC68Z5fx.dpuf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KnightofChrist Posted May 14, 2014 Share Posted May 14, 2014 In Georgia, 53.6% of the Babies Aborted Are Black Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KnightofChrist Posted May 14, 2014 Share Posted May 14, 2014 [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rqLyyIsKyCU[/media] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4588686 Posted May 14, 2014 Share Posted May 14, 2014 Ok? You made a claim that there is a coordinated, or at least systemic, effort on the part of abortion clinic owners to eliminate poor people by placing clinics in poorer, urban areas. You've just regurgitated a lot disjointed statistics from different data sets with no coherent argument weaving them into a clear thesis. That's not how you establish a trend in the social sciences. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4588686 Posted May 14, 2014 Share Posted May 14, 2014 http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/gpr/11/3/gpr110302.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now