PhuturePriest Posted October 30, 2013 Share Posted October 30, 2013 How can we speak so much about science without once mentioning relativity? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Not The Philosopher Posted October 30, 2013 Share Posted October 30, 2013 Special or general? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AccountDeleted Posted October 30, 2013 Share Posted October 30, 2013 Special or general? It's all relative. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Desert Walker Posted October 31, 2013 Share Posted October 31, 2013 How can we speak so much about science without once mentioning relativity? Neither version has helped us understand how nature really works. Both papers have just brought in more confusion. There is no reason at all to think that the bending of light at the limbs of celestial bodies is caused by "warped space." What the heck...? Celestial bodies are TOTALLY surrounded by invisible fields-of-force effects. Why say space is a "fabric" that can be "warped"? And why not question whether C is a constant? What would be so wrong with that? :hmmm: I recommend this site: www.metaresearch.org Relativity is overrated. Maxwell, Faraday, and Tesla are the real giants of the modern era. IMHAO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now