Jump to content
An Old School Catholic Message Board

Proposition: Formal Debate


Nihil Obstat

Recommended Posts

An impartial judge should choose the winner of the debate.

 

I nominate Winchester as judge.

 

He's going to judge either way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone you would want to back you up?

 

 

I don't know.  I don't have any objection to anybody joining in.  I would think that Lillabett, Aloysius, and Era might have some interesting views that don't really side either either of us (you, me, and Winchester)  It really depends on how tightly you and Winchester want to structure things.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe we could still have the general structure of a debate but allow anybody to ask questions?  Or maybe let anybody participate but insist that anybody joining must restate his opponents argument as he or she understands it and address every point (even if only to say 'I agree') of the point he or she responds to?  I'm just spitballing.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nihil Obstat

I don't know.  I don't have any objection to anybody joining in.  I would think that Lillabett, Aloysius, and Era might have some interesting views that don't really side either either of us (you, me, and Winchester)  It really depends on how tightly you and Winchester want to structure things.  

 

Any of them could be fun. Era is actually who came to mind to me first. Al is probably too busy and stuff. :P
I am more than willing to take on a fairly loose structure with all this. A sort of debate format is what came to mind for me, with a sort of vague point-counterpoint going on, but I am not particularly wedded to that exact idea.

 

Maybe we could still have the general structure of a debate but allow anybody to ask questions?  Or maybe let anybody participate but insist that anybody joining must restate his opponents argument as he or she understands it and address every point (even if only to say 'I agree') of the point he or she responds to?  I'm just spitballing.  

I think this might be more fruitful if we are strict about the number of contributors. Not that I do not appreciate input from other people, but at that point our thread would not be much different from the average PM thread, you know?

 

Plus since I am a dirty capitalist, clearly I have an innate desire to keep out the riffraff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not wearing a bloody tie.

 

 

Can it be more of a discussion? 

 

We also have brown pants for you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd be more interested in participating if there was some positive purpose of the discussion...rather than debate theory, discuss how our viewpoints translate to ways of being in the real world. Maybe a group blog format, even a reading group dimension to the discussion so that it's based on some common starting point.

Edited by Era Might
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 It really depends on how tightly you and Winchester want to structure things.  

We're anarchists. The whole thing will probably turn into an orgy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nihil Obstat

I am still up for it if Winnie is, and if you find yourself a partner. Or are we calling them 'life companions' now?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...