jeffboom Posted May 9, 2013 Share Posted May 9, 2013 That's the joy of calling someone "whitey". Plus, Germans are not always neon-white. For instance: He's completely German, but not super white. That's because we Germans are amesome like that. I'm sorry, but Cardinal R is super white. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhuturePriest Posted May 9, 2013 Share Posted May 9, 2013 I'm sorry, but Cardinal R is super white. That's not white. That's tan. This is white: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeffboom Posted May 9, 2013 Share Posted May 9, 2013 That's not white. That's tan. This is white: Cardinal Ratzinger is a white guy with a tan. This ^ is some random (not tan) white girl. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CatholicsAreKewl Posted May 9, 2013 Share Posted May 9, 2013 That girl is whiter than mayonnaise. Someone should lock her in a tanning bed for a month. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anastasia13 Posted May 9, 2013 Share Posted May 9, 2013 Africa is a continent, not a color. I completely agree, but society does not always view things that way. http://www.diversityinc.com/ask-the-white-guy/ask-the-white-guy-is-a-white-person-from-africa-an-african-american/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thy Geekdom Come Posted May 9, 2013 Share Posted May 9, 2013 I cannot be the only African American on Phatmass. I've been on Phatmass for 10 years (with a few breaks), and I never knew you were African American. Perhaps others aren't talking about it much, either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
homeschoolmom Posted May 9, 2013 Share Posted May 9, 2013 super white woman Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cmaD2006 Posted May 9, 2013 Share Posted May 9, 2013 Some people just want to be offended, I guess. No ... just a point I made. I would have never made such a division. But hey this is enough -- I think it's time to go elsewhere. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhuturePriest Posted May 9, 2013 Share Posted May 9, 2013 I've been on Phatmass for 10 years (with a few breaks), and I never knew you were African American. Perhaps others aren't talking about it much, either. He's not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vincent Vega Posted May 10, 2013 Share Posted May 10, 2013 Just kidding, I really don't care. This is one of the best parts of any post here that I've ever read. To speak to the bit about what Germans look like, "Germany" - in a form that would be commonly recognized by both contemporary people and people of that time - didn't exist until about 1814, with the rise of the German Confederation (and even then, the people would have considered themselves Bavaria/Austrian/Prussian/whatever local jurisdiction they fell under). These divisions, however, go much further back, and encapsulate the ethnic features found throughout Germany by the peoples who inhabited/invaded the land at different times, most notably during the Völkerwanderung, c. AD 1 - 500, during which time, modern Germany saw the residence of: -the Huns (from eastern Europe (Asia before that) who moved through the central and southern parts of modern Germany) -the Visigoths (from modern Greece, moved through southern parts of modern Gemany and neighboring regions, before continuing to Iberia) -the Ostrogoths (from eastern Europe, through central Germany, to central Italy) -the Franks (who originated in northern Germany, and moved westward through northern France) And this is to say nothing of the original Germanic tribes, who came from Scandinavia, or the Gothic tribes that they themselves replaced. In any case, attempting to pidgeonhole a country as large and diverse as Germany as having a typical look when they're the product of the genetic material of people who looked like they were from any combination of upper Asia, Greece, Denmark, Sweden, Italy, and many, many more is - at best - a futile effort. Now, one might be able to say that there is a "Swabian", "Bavarian", "Franconian", etc. look, due to the more specific/localized nature of those demonyms, but given that people have still continued to move around and intermarry in the time since those tribes left there marks some 1000-1500 years ago - particularly in the last several decades - even that exercise becomes meaningless very quickly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now