jim111 Posted May 1, 2013 Author Share Posted May 1, 2013 There is no doctrine concerning art, Are you serious? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AnneLine Posted May 1, 2013 Share Posted May 1, 2013 Hey, one just cannot keep something like this to oneself. The joy is meant to be shared. ^^^^ THAT is what happens when you stay in the land of cold and snow too long.... Or when your MOTHER gives you the outfit and wants to see you in it. Oh my.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhuturePriest Posted May 1, 2013 Share Posted May 1, 2013 Are you serious? Do you even know what Doctrine is? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jim111 Posted May 1, 2013 Author Share Posted May 1, 2013 Again, context context context! You always strip these things of context! You need to provide more citation than that, because frankly I think there is simply too much missing here. This is only for the churches. It is not a total ban on nude art. If that is what you mean? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arfink Posted May 1, 2013 Share Posted May 1, 2013 This is only for the churches. It is not a total ban on nude art. If that is what you mean? Citations! I mean, this is the INTERNET Jim. Seriously. Look up the whole document online. Provide a link. Let people look at the context when you provide a quote. Otherwise you come off as merely shouting and mis-quoting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AnneLine Posted May 1, 2013 Share Posted May 1, 2013 (Sorry about the guy in wintery red.... didn't realize there was another page of flying fur.... didn't intend to disrupt the chain of thought) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arfink Posted May 1, 2013 Share Posted May 1, 2013 (Sorry about the guy in wintery red.... didn't realize there was another page of flying fur.... didn't intend to disrupt the chain of thought) Please come help us disrupt! :) We need more red shirts in here, if you know what I mean. :evil: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jim111 Posted May 1, 2013 Author Share Posted May 1, 2013 Do you even know what Doctrine is? Among many other doctrins on art. 2. At the same time We have desired to grant what many of you, venerable brethren, have requested in our wisdom and also what has been asked by outstanding masters of this liberal art and distinguished students of sacred music at meetings devoted to the subject. The experience of pastoral life and the advances being made in the study of this art have persuaded Us that this step is timely. Musicae Sacre, Pius XII 22. On this score sacred music obeys laws and rules which are no different from those prescribed for all religious art and, indeed, for art in general. Now we are aware of the fact that during recent years some artists, gravely offending against Christian piety, have dared to bring into churches works devoid of any religious inspiration and completely at variance with the right rules of art. They try to justify this deplorable conduct by plausible-looking arguments which they claim are based on the nature and character of art itself. They go on to say that artistic inspiration is free and that it is wrong to impose upon it laws and standards extraneous to art, whether they are religious or moral, since such rules seriously hurt the dignity of art and place bonds and shackles on the activity of an inspired artist. 23. Arguments of this kind raise a question which is certainly difficult and serious, and which affects all art and every artist. It is a question which is not to be answered by an appeal to the principles of art or of aesthetics, but which must be decided in terms of the supreme principle of the final end, which is the inviolate and sacred rule for every man and every human act. 24. The ordination and direction of man to his ultimate end - which is God - by absolute and necessary law based on the nature and the infinite perfection of God Himself is so solid that not even God could exempt anyone from it. This eternal and unchangeable law commands that man himself and all his actions should manifest and imitate, so far as possible, God's infinite perfection for the praise and glory of the Creator. Since man is born to attain this supreme end, he ought to conform himself and through his actions direct all powers of his body and his soul, rightly ordered among themselves and duly subjected to the end they are meant to attain, to the divine Model. Therefore even art and works of art must be judged in the light of their conformity and concord with man's last end. Musicae Sacre, Pius XII Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhuturePriest Posted May 1, 2013 Share Posted May 1, 2013 Among many other doctrins on art. 2. At the same time We have desired to grant what many of you, venerable brethren, have requested in our wisdom and also what has been asked by outstanding masters of this liberal art and distinguished students of sacred music at meetings devoted to the subject. The experience of pastoral life and the advances being made in the study of this art have persuaded Us that this step is timely. Musicae Sacre, Pius XII 22. On this score sacred music obeys laws and rules which are no different from those prescribed for all religious art and, indeed, for art in general. Now we are aware of the fact that during recent years some artists, gravely offending against Christian piety, have dared to bring into churches works devoid of any religious inspiration and completely at variance with the right rules of art. They try to justify this deplorable conduct by plausible-looking arguments which they claim are based on the nature and character of art itself. They go on to say that artistic inspiration is free and that it is wrong to impose upon it laws and standards extraneous to art, whether they are religious or moral, since such rules seriously hurt the dignity of art and place bonds and shackles on the activity of an inspired artist. 23. Arguments of this kind raise a question which is certainly difficult and serious, and which affects all art and every artist. It is a question which is not to be answered by an appeal to the principles of art or of aesthetics, but which must be decided in terms of the supreme principle of the final end, which is the inviolate and sacred rule for every man and every human act. 24. The ordination and direction of man to his ultimate end - which is God - by absolute and necessary law based on the nature and the infinite perfection of God Himself is so solid that not even God could exempt anyone from it. This eternal and unchangeable law commands that man himself and all his actions should manifest and imitate, so far as possible, God's infinite perfection for the praise and glory of the Creator. Since man is born to attain this supreme end, he ought to conform himself and through his actions direct all powers of his body and his soul, rightly ordered among themselves and duly subjected to the end they are meant to attain, to the divine Model. Therefore even art and works of art must be judged in the light of their conformity and concord with man's last end. Musicae Sacre, Pius XII All I'm reading about is music. I meant "art" as in what people usually think of when you say "art". Paintings, French guys with hats that Americans laugh at, etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jim111 Posted May 1, 2013 Author Share Posted May 1, 2013 Citations! I mean, this is the INTERNET Jim. Seriously. Look up the whole document online. Provide a link. Let people look at the context when you provide a quote. Otherwise you come off as merely shouting and mis-quoting. Cause the 25th session of Trent is really hard to find. http://www.catholicbook.com/AgredaCD/Ecumenical_Councils/trent/ct25.htm Moreover, in the invocation of saints, the veneration of relics, and the sacred use of images, every superstition shall be removed, all filthy lucre be abolished; finally, all lasciviousness be avoided; in such wise that figures shall not be painted or adorned with a beauty exciting to lust; nor the celebration of the saints, and the visitation of relics be by any perverted into revellings and drunkenness; as if festivals are celebrated to the honour of the saints by luxury and wantonness. Sess.25, Trent Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jim111 Posted May 1, 2013 Author Share Posted May 1, 2013 All I'm reading about is music. I meant "art" as in what people usually think of when you say "art". Paintings, French guys with hats that Americans laugh at, etc. 22. On this score sacred music obeys laws and rules which are no different from those prescribed for all religious art and, indeed, for art in general. Now we are aware of the fact that during recent years some artists, gravely offending against Christian piety, have dared to bring into churches works devoid of any religious inspiration and completely at variance with the right rules of art. They try to justify this deplorable conduct by plausible-looking arguments which they claim are based on the nature and character of art itself. They go on to say that artistic inspiration is free and that it is wrong to impose upon it laws and standards extraneous to art, whether they are religious or moral, since such rules seriously hurt the dignity of art and place bonds and shackles on the activity of an inspired artist. Musicae Sacrae However if you still want more: LETTER OF HIS HOLINESS POPE JOHN PAUL II TO ARTISTS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nihil Obstat Posted May 1, 2013 Share Posted May 1, 2013 So erotic art is not permitted at church. Great, I agree. I think that would be rather crass. Now demonstrate that those examples we discussed certainly "excite lust". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arfink Posted May 1, 2013 Share Posted May 1, 2013 Cause the 25th session of Trent is really hard to find. http://www.catholicbook.com/AgredaCD/Ecumenical_Councils/trent/ct25.htm Moreover, in the invocation of saints, the veneration of relics, and the sacred use of images, every superstition shall be removed, all filthy lucre be abolished; finally, all lasciviousness be avoided; in such wise that figures shall not be painted or adorned with a beauty exciting to lust; nor the celebration of the saints, and the visitation of relics be by any perverted into revellings and drunkenness; as if festivals are celebrated to the honour of the saints by luxury and wantonness. Sess.25, Trent Then I must respectfully request that you stop using it for the purposes of this argument. Thank you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jim111 Posted May 1, 2013 Author Share Posted May 1, 2013 (edited) So erotic art is not permitted at church. Great, I agree. I think that would be rather crass. Now demonstrate that those examples we discussed certainly "excite lust". It was a woman with her breasts exposed. Pius the XII said women are not to have there clothing lower then 2 fingers below the pit of the throat, or tight clothing, as it could cause lust. The woman in the picture is completely naked. Yes one can choose to look and not lust, just like a i can look at a real woman and choose not to lust, but it certainly puts one in a unnecessary situation to be tempted with sin. Edited May 1, 2013 by jim111 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jim111 Posted May 1, 2013 Author Share Posted May 1, 2013 Then I must respectfully request that you stop using it for the purposes of this argument. Thank you. I was not using it as an argument, someone asked about it, and i was providing for them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now