Gabriela Posted March 28, 2013 Share Posted March 28, 2013 Why? It's been AGES... It's boring now. :yawn: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4588686 Posted March 28, 2013 Share Posted March 28, 2013 Because I own you like property. Welcome to the libertarian paradise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gabriela Posted March 28, 2013 Author Share Posted March 28, 2013 Because I own you like property. Welcome to the libertarian paradise. Silly. Libertarians don't own people! That's the socialist paradise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4588686 Posted March 28, 2013 Share Posted March 28, 2013 Silly. Libertarians don't own people! That's the socialist paradise. Socialism doesn't retain private property. Some major libertarian theorists, Norzick comes to mind, have admitted that slavery would be permitted in libertarianism. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the171 Posted March 28, 2013 Share Posted March 28, 2013 I'm just an independent conservative who isn't a fan of Republicans, Libertarians, or Democrats. See ya! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beati Pacifici Posted March 28, 2013 Share Posted March 28, 2013 I'm just an independent conservative who isn't a fan of Republicans, Libertarians, or Democrats. See ya! I support Cobra Commander Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gabriela Posted March 28, 2013 Author Share Posted March 28, 2013 Socialism doesn't retain private property. Some major libertarian theorists, Norzick comes to mind, have admitted that slavery would be permitted in libertarianism. Right. Because under socialism, the government owns everybody. In my experience, you can find "some major theorist" to say anything you like about anything you like. Shocking claims "well justified" by lots of lofty reasoning and zero moral grounding get a lot of people published. [shrug] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4588686 Posted March 28, 2013 Share Posted March 28, 2013 Right. Because under socialism, the government owns everybody. No. Under socialism there is no government. In my experience, you can find "some major theorist" to say anything you like about anything you like. Shocking claims "well justified" by lots of lofty reasoning and zero moral grounding get a lot of people published. [shrug] Norzick is not an obscure figure. He's the major libertarian theorist of the anglophone world for the second half of the 20th century. It's not a shocking claim. It makes sense. In a genuinely libertarian state why shouldn't individuals be able to enter into slavery contracts? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4588686 Posted March 28, 2013 Share Posted March 28, 2013 I don't know where moral ground against the comes in with your worldview. The Bible certainly doesn't prohibit slavery. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nihil Obstat Posted March 28, 2013 Share Posted March 28, 2013 Norzick is not an obscure figure. He's the major libertarian theorist of the anglophone world for the second half of the 20th century. It's not a shocking claim. It makes sense. In a genuinely libertarian state why shouldn't individuals be able to enter into slavery contracts? Nozick is also pretty well regarded in certain branches of philosophy, interestingly enough. I think we referred to him a few times in an ethics class, although I cannot remember the exact context now. I remember that it was someone else referring to him, or responding to him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gabriela Posted March 28, 2013 Author Share Posted March 28, 2013 Are we talking about pure theoretical models or actual "living" examples of these two systems? Cuz it makes a difference. And again: Why are we all still "St. Hasa Perm"s? Can we come up with nothing new? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MIKolbe Posted March 28, 2013 Share Posted March 28, 2013 we can.. but we know it irks you. so we persist and take pleasure from that fact. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gabriela Posted March 29, 2013 Author Share Posted March 29, 2013 we can.. but we know it irks you. so we persist and take pleasure from that fact. Schadenfreude is unchristian, sir. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now