Obama Claims Authority To Murder U S Citizens On U S Soil

[eagle_eye222001]

Don't answer questions.  Always leave options open.  WHY?

 

Because you never know when you might want to take out citizens who disagree with you. <_<

 

 

Seriously.....what am I supposed to assume?

 

 

 

 

 

FOR FREEDOM!  FOR AMERICA!

 

ROCK ON RAND! :crusader2:

[Apotheoun]

I give Obama credit for ingenuity . . . after all, he is the only Nobel Peace Prize winner with a kill list.

[Autumn Dusk]

I give Obama credit for ingenuity . . . after all, he is the only Nobel Peace Prize winner with a kill list.

 

What will/would it take for him to get stripped of his Nobel?  I mean the guy has had so many scandals involving guns and deaths, besides the fact that he hasn't actually done anything but make the day-to-day lives of our troops in Iraq and Afganastan worse.  They were often seen as reluctant heros, now they are white infadels.

[Evangetholic]

What will/would it take for him to get stripped of his Nobel?  I mean the guy has had so many scandals involving guns and deaths, besides the fact that he hasn't actually done anything but make the day-to-day lives of our troops in Iraq and Afganastan worse.  They were often seen as reluctant heros, now they are white infadels.

 

Plenty of American troops aren't white. ;)

[Autumn Dusk]

Plenty of American troops aren't white. ;)

 

Sure, but the greater sentiment is against the white troops.  Most of the majors and generals are white or pale-skinned so part is guilt by association.

[Basilisa Marie]

(But the Constitution itself is an anti-Catholic document. We shouldn't bother with it. With my conversion I've gone from a general dislike and distrust of the US government to a belief that it's irreconcilable with Catholic understandings and must either be overthrown or rendered toothless enough to not harm the faith.)

 

Oh great. Another one. The Constitution is not an inherently anti-Catholic document.  

 

But as far as anarcho-Catholicism goes....

 

Have you read any Dorothy Day? Done any research on the Catholic Worker movement?  

[KnightofChrist]

At least someone in Hollywood gets it, and stands up for princple rather than walk in lock step with the Party.

 

@johncusack
 
dems ? Do U have any thoughts on Obama's transition from a progressive academic humanist 2 a regressive corporate warlord?

-

@johncusack

For gods sake where are democrats ?? “@democracynow: Rand Paul: Obama Admin Response Drones "More Than Frightening" http://owl.li/itdHI ”

-

@johncusack

Good question“@cenkuygur: Up to 8 Senators now joining the Rand Paul #filibuster. Where are the so-called progressive Democratic senators?”
 
 
Source: http://twitchy.com/2013/03/06/john-cusak-on-rand-paul-filibuster/

[StMichael]

Not to be contradictory, but his speciality was not constitutional law but to subvert constitutional law. 

 

There is simply nothing in keeping with the Constitution that this administration has done. It is all to subvert it.

 

Obama's DOJ refused to look into voting violations in Philly (Black Panthers), ran guns (Fast and Furious), provided no protection to an Ambassador (Benghanzi), releasing illegal immigrants en masse not to mention signing into law, a law that is unconstitutional (Obamacare). 

 

This recent development, whereby drones will be used on US soil violates  at least 3 amendments (1, 4 & 6). These drones are armed, able to pick up wifi and cel transmissions, detect if a person is armed as well as give a visual. 

 

Currently these drones are out there working for the EPA over farms, but overall this extends the Federal governments power not given to them and especially Obama, Boehner, Reid all took an oath to uphold and defend the Constitution.

 

We are truly in uncharted territory and it is hard to keep count on all the liberties we have ceded to the Federal government at this point.

 

It bothers me the more because Obama's legal specialty is constitutional law. 

 

[Evangetholic]

Oh great. Another one. The Constitution is not an inherently anti-Catholic document.  

 

But as far as anarcho-Catholicism goes....

 

Have you read any Dorothy Day? Done any research on the Catholic Worker movement?  

 

I love Dorothy Day. :)

[Gabriela]

Pretty sure you boys should move this to the Debate Table now.

[Fidei Defensor]

Actually, Obama didn't claim any such thing.  The Attorney General clarified with a resounding no --

http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2013/images/03/07/senator.rand.paul.second.letter.pdf

[4588686]

Actually, Obama didn't claim any such thing. The Attorney General clarified with a resounding no --
http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2013/images/03/07/senator.rand.paul.second.letter.pdf

That's really shocking unless somebody actually read the memo carefully.

[eagle_eye222001]

Actually, Obama didn't claim any such thing.  The Attorney General clarified with a resounding no --

http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2013/images/03/07/senator.rand.paul.second.letter.pdf

 

Took him long enough.  Eric Holder took his good ol' time in doing so.  Apparently you don't answer someone's question until they've filibustered for 13 hours or so.

[Fidei Defensor]

Took him long enough.  Eric Holder took his good ol' time in doing so.  Apparently you don't answer someone's question until they've filibustered for 13 hours or so.

 

What fun would that be?

[KnightofChrist]

Actually, Obama didn't claim any such thing. The Attorney General clarified with a resounding no --
http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2013/images/03/07/senator.rand.paul.second.letter.pdf

Yes, that sounds better. But I am still concerned that they would strike Americans suspected of being combatants preemptively. Attack drones seem to be used mostly for preemptive strikes. They do this now to non-Americans suspected of being combatants off of American soil. Sometimes they kill their targets along with innocents, sometimes they miss their target or strike the wrong target and just kill innocents. And they always seem to say (when such attacks are actually made pubic) that they were targeting enemy commandants.