Roamin Catholic Posted January 14, 2013 Share Posted January 14, 2013 oh you know how to make the girls throw up, don't you? :love: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nihil Obstat Posted January 14, 2013 Share Posted January 14, 2013 I'm implying there should be more alcohol involved. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lil Red Posted January 14, 2013 Share Posted January 14, 2013 Can I just say that Phatmass gets all kinds of crazy after dark? There should be a warning label. what can we say? we're all good Catholics and drinking on all the days that end in "y"! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Basilisa Marie Posted January 14, 2013 Share Posted January 14, 2013 oh you know how to make the girls throw up, don't you? there's already plenty involved. ;) :cheers: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winchester Posted January 14, 2013 Share Posted January 14, 2013 Why don't you come to Chicago and say it to my face you little punk? James weighs around 463 pounds, and has to be moved to the bathroom using a crane. He's certainly not little. But according to his prison history, he is, in fact, a punk. But he ain't a virgin. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhuturePriest Posted January 14, 2013 Share Posted January 14, 2013 A round of wine for everyone and some grape juice for the junior over here. :irish: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roamin Catholic Posted January 14, 2013 Share Posted January 14, 2013 James weighs around 463 pounds, and has to be moved to the bathroom using a crane. He's certainly not little. But according to his prison history, he is, in fact, a punk. But he ain't a virgin. :love: You certainly do romance better than Norseman :love: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4588686 Posted January 14, 2013 Share Posted January 14, 2013 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norseman82 Posted January 14, 2013 Share Posted January 14, 2013 You're not wrong to express your desire to start a family. The way you post about it seems very flawed, though, and that's what people bristle at. Like I said before, it sounds to me like you see a future wife as a means to an end, and not a person. And the unequally yoked verse is balanced by the verse talking about unbelieving spouses being sanctified through believing ones. If you recall the historical context of the verse regarding believing spouses sanctifying unbelieving ones, I believe that was in the same chapter where St. Paul established the "Pauline privilege", and that referred to a married couple that was unbelieving, and one spouse then became a believer, which could cause problems in a marriage. And yes, non-faithful spouses can cause faith problems for a believing spouse. For one thing, if the non-faithful spouse wants to use ABC or attend an illegal wedding or "committment ceremony" that would cause scandal, especially if it were to give a bad example to the kids, or not attend Mass, or sabotage orthodox Catholic values from being instilled into the kids, that would be detrimental to Catholic family life. To insinuate that God would call someone to risk their soul (this is in response to FP, aka "the fetus above me" as JLOL once referred to him) and to call it disrespect toward women is truly insane and illogical. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4588686 Posted January 14, 2013 Share Posted January 14, 2013 (edited) Let's all agree not to tell dUSt about my mouthguard comment. Although I do find Norseman's refusal to answer the question interesting. Edited January 14, 2013 by Hasan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roamin Catholic Posted January 14, 2013 Share Posted January 14, 2013 What are the top ten reasons not to be Catholic? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhuturePriest Posted January 14, 2013 Share Posted January 14, 2013 If you recall the historical context of the verse regarding believing spouses sanctifying unbelieving ones, I believe that was in the same chapter where St. Paul established the "Pauline privilege", and that referred to a married couple that was unbelieving, and one spouse then became a believer, which could cause problems in a marriage. And yes, non-faithful spouses can cause faith problems for a believing spouse. For one thing, if the non-faithful spouse wants to use ABC or attend an illegal wedding or "committment ceremony" that would cause scandal, especially if it were to give a bad example to the kids, or not attend Mass, or sabotage orthodox Catholic values from being instilled into the kids, that would be detrimental to Catholic family life. To insinuate that God would call someone to risk their soul (this is in response to FP, aka "the fetus above me" as JLOL once referred to him) and to call it disrespect toward women is truly insane and illogical. I'm sorry to inform you of this, but our vocations will come with so many soul-threatening situations that we will sometimes have nowhere to duck for cover except in Jesus' arms. Every vocation comes with its difficult temptations, even if your vocation is to marry the most immaculate and God-fearing Catholic woman since the Mother of God was born. You cannot run from temptations, and you cannot blame giving into temptations on your "pagan jezebel" of a wife. Her not wanting to raise the children Catholic and things such as that are serious and valid concerns -- but that is why you are supposed to discuss and communicate before you say "I do". God is not going to call you to a vocation that dooms your soul. He doesn't work like that, and to insinuate that shows a clear distrust of His love and plan for your soul. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norseman82 Posted January 14, 2013 Share Posted January 14, 2013 (edited) Let's all agree not to tell dUSt about my mouthguard comment. Although I do find Norseman's refusal to answer the question interesting. No, I just first saw it after posting a logical comment. But, if you want my answer: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fbqBDd75Q9k Edited January 14, 2013 by Norseman82 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roamin Catholic Posted January 14, 2013 Share Posted January 14, 2013 (edited) No, I just first saws it after posting a logical comment. You type like a Canadian...I bet Red loves you Edited January 14, 2013 by Roamin_Catholic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4588686 Posted January 14, 2013 Share Posted January 14, 2013 No, I just first saws it after posting a logical comment. But, if you want my answer: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fbqBDd75Q9k Too kinky for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now