MIKolbe Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 LOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anomaly Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 And again, congrates on the dUSt-baby mite! Fxd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OnlySunshine Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 Wait, there are problems? List them. I'll fix them. When you try to change anything in the "Profile settings" function, it says "cannot leave religion blank" but it doesn't show the religion box at all. There's this at the bottom of the Profile Editor instead: Error: Could not load template '__f__fddfbe7d569ca6053b3e9e0e33473c6f' from group 'ucp' Since the member title is in the same area (as well as "About Me"), you cannot make any changes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dUSt Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 I took off the religion field from profiles. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anomaly Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 I took off the religion field from profiles. Why? It makes it more difficult to judge or evaluate poster's perspective. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cmaD2006 Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 Someone has already mentioned it but not sure if you noticed dUSt but Phatmassers have no "props" next to them when they post. Church Militants and Admins do. Essentially -- can't prop a Phatmasser's post. (example -- look at EmilyAnn's post above). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dUSt Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 Why? It makes it more difficult to judge or evaluate poster's perspective. OK, I'll put it back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OnlySunshine Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 OK, I'll put it back. Whatever you did, it worked. I updated my profile successfully. :yahoo: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dUSt Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 Someone has already mentioned it but not sure if you noticed dUSt but Phatmassers have no "props" next to them when they post. Church Militants and Admins do. Essentially -- can't prop a Phatmasser's post. (example -- look at EmilyAnn's post above). Fixed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cmaD2006 Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 Yippie! Me go prop someone I should go prop :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nihil Obstat Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 I would like the religion field to remain on the profiles and underneath avatars. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AnneLine Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 dUSt, thank you for the ability to update my title. :) now... when you are ready for a bit more for the 'honey-do' list... . . . . Time to clip the outside hedge. Almost springtime! See www.phatmass.com for details.... HINT! Thank you!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gabriela Posted January 10, 2013 Author Share Posted January 10, 2013 So...are those random post numbers? Because they should TOTALLY BE IMPORTANT DATES IN CHRISTIAN HISTORY. 30 (Crucifixion), 50 (Council of Jerusalem), 120 (Didache) 180 (Irenaeus' Against Heresies), 313 (Edict of Milan), 400 (Vulgate Published), 590 (Pope Gregory the Great elected), 800 (Crowning of Charlemagne), 1054 (Great Schism), 1370 (Catherine calls the pope back to Rome), 1545 (Council of Trent begun), 1789 (Carroll appointed as first bishop in the USA), 1870 (declaration of papal infallibility), 1962 (opening of Vatican II)...to name a few. :| Just an idea. :saint2: You forgot "2012 (curiousing is received into the Church)". Sheesh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Groo the Wanderer Posted January 10, 2013 Share Posted January 10, 2013 Yippie! Me go prop someone I should go prop :) me me me! missed you! :drunks: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gabriela Posted January 10, 2013 Author Share Posted January 10, 2013 OK, I'll put it back. I can see the sense in having it, but Thomas A Kempis (and Aristotle) say you should judge the value of an idea by the idea, not by who it came from. Just something to consider. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now