tinytherese Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 That reminds me of what happened to a peer of mine I met when I attended Benedictine College. She was a transfer student from a Catholic college in my home town (if you can even call it a Catholic school.) She wanted to start a pro-life club on campus, but was refused because it would discriminate against those who had a different viewpoint. I wonder then if the basketball team would be discriminatory against those who don't like basketball. :think: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
add Posted December 11, 2012 Author Share Posted December 11, 2012 Nationwide, the plates have raised over $14 million for Pro-Life causes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anomaly Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 Men in black robes don't impress me. I had to call and check, but it's confirmed. They were not trying to impress you at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XIX Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 Oh no, now we're all going to have to invent pro-life bumper stickers. This will surely stop the pro-life movement dead in its tracks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eagle_eye222001 Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 That reminds me of what happened to a peer of mine I met when I attended Benedictine College. She was a transfer student from a Catholic college in my home town (if you can even call it a Catholic school.) She wanted to start a pro-life club on campus, but was refused because it would discriminate against those who had a different viewpoint. I wonder then if the basketball team would be discriminatory against those who don't like basketball. :think: YES!!!!!! Oh society, the wonders you do! Should have started a KKK club* to counter the NAACP college society :P *comment meant ironically in terms of situation. Am not an advocate of "hate" groups. I belief in freedom of speech though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winchester Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 I had to call and check, but it's confirmed. They were not trying to impress you at all. I didn't say they were. They're your gods, not mine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southern california guy Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 Thanks Shania. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mqFLXayD6e8 She rejected all of them... I think she should have considered accepting a ride from at least somebody, considering that she was out in the middle of a desert! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winchester Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 she was out in the middle of a desert! With a camera crew. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Selah Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 Thanks Shania. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mqFLXayD6e8 How dare you insult Phatmass and post that drivel? That....how dare you! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nihil Obstat Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 How dare you insult Phatmass and post that drivel? That....how dare you! It was intended for lulzy purposes, meaning that it falls under fair use guidelines in section 4.b. of "crap we never post on the internet". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slappo Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 I don't see what's wrong with "Choose Life". It is not inherently a "pro lifer vs pro choicer" statement. Choose Life would also mean don't kill people and don't commit suicide. Just parse the $15 for $5 for pregnancy centers, $5 for suicide awareness, and $5 for anti violence stuff... Choose Life is not a political statement... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Selah Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 It was intended for lulzy purposes, meaning that it falls under fair use guidelines in section 4.b. of "crap we never post on the internet". She's not even worthy of that. She's worthy of nothing *folds arms* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nihil Obstat Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 She's not even worthy of that. She's worthy of nothing *folds arms* I am afraid that you have forced me to quote the "Internet Manual, Third Edition", Appendix III, section 4.b. "When making media references for lulzy purposes (as defined in section 1.a., the lulziness of the reference shall be considered inversely proportional to the utter fail of the original media." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Selah Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 I am afraid that you have forced me to quote the "Internet Manual, Third Edition", Appendix III, section 4.b. "When making media references for lulzy purposes (as defined in section 1.a., the lulziness of the reference shall be considered inversely proportional to the utter fail of the original media." I don't know math! Gah. <_< Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winchester Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 srss bznss Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now