theculturewarrior Posted December 17, 2012 Share Posted December 17, 2012 75% of the time I treat you like an adult. What was I thinking? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nihil Obstat Posted December 17, 2012 Share Posted December 17, 2012 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nihil Obstat Posted December 17, 2012 Share Posted December 17, 2012 http://youtu.be/-7IxomweIx8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nihil Obstat Posted December 17, 2012 Share Posted December 17, 2012 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nihil Obstat Posted December 17, 2012 Share Posted December 17, 2012 serial experiments lain is an anime which begs to be interpreted (read my review for a basic description of the show). While the story gives us a lot of hints as to what might be going on, nothing is ever explicitly explained. Even when things are explained in the form of commentary and "speeches" throughout the show, we are shown that the views put forth in those speeches (such as given by Eiri Masami) are not necessarily correct and truthful. When dealing with prophetic speech or prophetic anime, it is our responsibility to be skeptical and questioning just like Lain was, even though the uncertainty can be painful at times. Yet, it wasn't so painful. serial experiments lain could have easily fallen into the same trap that so many other "meaningful" anime fall into, that is: take itself too seriously. By refusing to explain itself any more than it did, serial experiments lain avoids that trap. If anything, it explicitly showed (through references) that there is a lot more out there beyond the scope of what 13 episodes of anime can explain, that these ideas are not brand new, that other people have a lot to say about all of this, and those sources are available to anyone with more than a passing interest in what serial experiments lain is all about. Although serial experiments lain does not attempt (or pretend) to offer a totally new vision, it succeeds wildly as a new and wonderfully constructed synthesis of older elements. In that sense, lain the anime has a distinct postmodern identity, the type of identity that Lain the character is searching for. The creators of lain have made a progressive cyberpunk anime which is highly informed and operative on multiple layers, both figuratively and literally. No single explanation or speech or essay can hope to encompass all that is serial experiments lain. As such, lain will always be open to interpretation and always encourage us to do our own research, our own experiments, which is why I call this document thought experiments lain. Initially, I wrote these notes as a reference to help me in a paper I am writing. However, as I researched and wrote, I realized that such a reference could be useful to other fans of lain, or at least provoke some interesting conversation. The interpretations offered below are personal opinions and the result of multiple (and continuing) iterations of watching and thinking about the series. They are not rigid beliefs, and should not be taken overly seriously. I have tried to separate what is more-or-less factual from what is less clear and more interpretive. If there are obvious factual errors, I will be appreciative if you bring them to my attention. Finally, if you have different theories (you probably do) or something to add to mine (also likely), let's talk. Feel free to e-mail me privately. I am also subscribed to the various lain mailing lists. Wired Network/Internet. Interpretation: A reality that is on a continuum with Real World. Stimulated, as in "This Accela makes me Wired". The state of being connected (such as to a network). A consensual hallucination (as in William Gibson's description of the Matrix in Neuromancer). We all agree (more or less) to share (more or less) the hallucination that is the Wired. Meaning, how much each person agrees to hallucinate the Wired will vary, and furthermore, each person's hallucination will vary (more or less) from the statistical average "consensus Wired." Real World Everyday human existence. Interpretation: A consensual hallucination. We all agree (more or less) to share (more or less) the hallucination that is Real World. Meaning, how much each person agrees to hallucinate Real World will vary, and furthermore, each person's hallucination will vary (more or less) from the statistical average "consensus Real World." Protocols Internet protocols. Interpretation: A protocol is a set of rules or procedures that people agree to use. Therefore, protocol implies consent, an agreement to believe in something and use it. Protocol 7 The protocol that fully links the Wired and Real World together. Devised by Eiri Masami while he was a Tachibana Lab employee. Against the wishes of Tachibana Lab, Eiri Masami designed Protocol 7 to utilize Schumann Resonance to connect everybody to the Wired (and therefore each other) without devices. Interpretation: As the series progresses, Protocol 7 seems to become more and more pervasive in the world of serial experiments lain as evidenced by the progressive "blurring" of Real World and the Wired, which appears to be correlated with Lain's increasing power and awareness. Protocol 7 makes the collective unconscious (as described by Jung) become the collective consciousness. As such, it may also be in reference to the Leary/Wilson 7th Circuit of the nervous-system/consciousness, aka the Collective Neurogenetic Circuit. On that note, it is interesting that Tachibana Lab also "succeeded in analyzing the molecular structure of the genome of human"--(quoted from Shindo's translated script, layer:11 "INFORNOGRAPHY"). That Tachibana Lab was able to do this may have provided the means for Eiri Masami to create Protocol 7. Leary and Wilson describe Circuit 7 as the DNA memory/genetic archives whose total collective information (beyond the individual, gene-pool, and species levels) is the consciousness of Gaia, the living global brain. So the evolution of the 7th circuit is the evolution of Gaia. Those who develop 7th circuit consciousness gain awareness of the DNA memory/genetic archive and of Gaia.The biosphere--Gaia--the DNA script--is more intelligent than all individuals, gene-pools and species. It has survived everything thrown at it for nearly 4 billion years, and is getting smarter all the time. It is on the edge of achieving immortality.--from Prometheus Rising by Robert Anton Wilson. Note: Our current Internet Protocol is IPv4 and we are in the process of transitioning to IPv6. The number 5 is some other non-IP protocol. If Protocol 7 has anything to do with our current numbering system, it is unclear. Related links:The Eight Circuits of Consciousness A model proposed by Dr. Timothy Leary and Robert Anton WilsonA multiple perspective view of the same modelRobert Anton Wilson page on deoxy.orgTimothy Leary page on deoxy.orgRobert Anton Wilson's official webpageTimothy Leary's official webpageCarl Jung An excellent summary of his ideas NAVI NAVI are the personal computers that people use in the world of serial experiments lain. They include both desktop and handheld models (HandyNAVI). NAVI computers are linked to the Wired. Interpretation: "NAVI" is most likely a contracted form of "Knowledge Navigator." John Sculley, the CEO of Apple from 1983 to 1993, described the Knowledge Navigator in his book titled Odyssey (1987). The Knowledge Navigator was his vision of Apple computers in the 21st Century. Accurately predicting many of the changes eventually brought about by the World Wide Web, the hypothetical Knowledge Navigator would allow people to communicate with each other from anywhere in the world, would be connected to a vast shared hypertextual (Sculley cites Ted Nelson in reference to hypertext) database of information (like the Web or the Wired), and would also utilize intelligent agents or artificial intelligences to actively search out information of interest. The Knowledge Navigator Sculley envisioned in 1987 would be suited for multimedia applications, utilizing large, high-definition, flat-display screens to support text, full-color, graphics, and computer generated animations. It would also feature high-fidelity sound, speech synthesis, and speech recognition. Sculley emphasized that the Knowledge Navigator would not need to take any specific form; it could be a desktop computer, a handheld, or even built into one's clothing. Eventually, Sculley would implement some of his Knowledge Navigator ideas into the Newton, Apple's more-or-less unsuccessful PDA (personal digital assistant). The Knowledge Navigator concept was promoted in a video called "The Knowledge Navigator: Technologies to Get Us There and Beyond" as well as a shorter commercial for general consumption. John Sculley's vision of the Knowledge Navigator, even if not fully realized, was important for the technologies it inspired as well as predicting the change of the personal computer's role as a productivity tool to one which is used to mediate information exchange and transfer. Other Apple Computer references in serial experiments lain include Copland, Lain's old NAVI, Alice's iMac, BeOS, Openstep, nExt, and "think different". Devices All and any technologies. Tools which allow interface. Interpretation: All devices extend and amputate us at the same time (see McLuhan link below). According to Eiri Masami, Protocol 7 allow humans to connect to the Wired without devices. With devices, we extend into the Wired, but cannot fully enter it. As such, we are both enabled and handicapped by devices. If we enter the Wired without devices, we potentially lose our sense of self. Good or bad, total connectedness also implies total loss of ego and identity. For further discussion, see my Explanation: "device" sequences in lain Related links:The Official Site of Marshall McLuhan Schumann Resonance Put very simply, the resonance frequencies of the Earth's electromagnetic field as measured by W.O. Schumann. 7.83 Hz (which is an average of several measurements) is the figure most often cited as the fundamental (base) Schumann Resonance frequency, in that electromagnetic waves of that frequency can propagate extremely quickly with little attenuation around the planet within what is known as the Schumann Cavity (a thin membrane of non-conductive air between the surface of the planet and the ionosphere). Schumann Resonance frequencies fall in the range of 6-50 Hz. Interpretation: It may be of particular interest to note that Nikola Tesla, who first observed the existence of what would later be called Schumann Resonance, theorized that it could be used for "... power transmission and transmission of intelligible messages to any point on the globe." In other words, a wireless system of energy transmission. "So astounding are the facts in this connection, that it would seem as though the Creator, himself had electrically designed this planet...." -- Nikola Tesla describing what is now known as Schumann Resonance (7.8 Hz) in "The Transmission of Electrical Energy Without Wires As A Means Of Furthering World Peace", Electrical World And Engineer, January 7, 1905, PP 21-24. Related links:Schumann Resonance A textbook explanationTesla Memorial Society of New YorkNikola Tesla Another interesting Tesla page Accela A "smart drug." Upon ingestion, it oscillates at a particular frequency which causes the secretion of a hormone (neurotransmitter?) which influences the user's sense of time, causes the user to feel as if his consciousness is accelerated, and also improves the brain's speed of calculation. The drug disappears from the body after one day. Interpretation: "Machine" as "drug." Suggests that machines can produce altered/expanded states of consciousness. "Drug" as "Machine." Suggests that "drugs" are technology. Logical/rational thought is a function of the 3rd Circuit (Leary and Wilson). Computing is a highly 3rd Circuit-intensive activity. Therefore, stimulants are the most obvious drugs of choice for the Wired generation. On Accela, one can move closer to the speed of the Wired, so Real World seems slower. Accela might function by temporarily bringing the user closer to Schumann Resonance frequencies, and therefore closer to the Wired even without the use of a NAVI. Accela possibly acts on Circuits 3 and 7 at the same time. Related links: See Protocol 7: Related links Infornography The title of layer:11 Interpretation: "Infornography" seems to be a made up word combining information and pornography, the idea being that--in the world of lain and increasingly so in our own world, information is being considered not just a valuable commodity from a practical point of view, but something that generates an almost sexual thrill, something that we lust after and enjoy hunting because it is special and gives us power. Some of the Knights portrayed in lain played their online information power games, not with cold detachment, but with an illicit thrill. The temptation and prospect of finding new information completely dominated the life of Nezumi (the hacker with the VR rig in layer:07 "SOCIETY"). It "turned him on" so to speak. The concept of the sexual turn-on gets confused and combined with the idea of turning-on one's computer and getting information on the Wired. Related links:Infornographic Design Cyberia Club where kids go to hang out and "have fun." Also, the title of a book by Douglas Rushkoff (1994), describing various cyber-cultures and their philosophies, as well as discussing notions of an evolving Global/Gaian Brain (such as described by James Lovelock and Peter Russell), of which humans are the neurons. Interpretation: For those who are unaware of connection, or who are forced to connect against their will: Cyberia->Siberia->feelings of coldness, isolation, being lost. In serial experiments lain, people go to Cyberia to be with others, but the "connection" can be impersonal, distant, or "cold," as well as disorienting. Cyberia equals condition of cyber equals state of communication between technology and human (which can be lacking in warmth). On the other hand, those who willingly go to Cyberia and are aware of their connectedness are more likley to be well-adjusted Cyberians. Related links: See Douglas Rushkoff: Related links Douglas Rushkoff Author, professor, consultant, radio commentator. A friend of Leary. Lectures on and writes about media, society, technology, computers, cyberculture, etc. As alluded to in layer:09 "PROTOCOL", he discusses the notion of the Global Brain (or Gaia) in his book, Cyberia: The people you are about to meet interpret the development of the datasphere as the hardwiring of a global brain. This is to be the final stage in the development of "Gaia," the living being that is the Earth, for which humans serve as the neurons. As computer programmers and psychedelic warriors together realize that ``all is one,'' a common belief emerges that the evolution of humanity has been a willful progression toward the construction of the next dimensional home for consciousness... Evolution is seen more as a groping toward than a random series of natural selections. Gaia is becoming conscious. Radzik and others have inferred that human beings serve as Gaia's brain cells. Each human being is an individual neuron, but unaware of his connection to the global organism as a whole. Evolution, then, depends on humanity's ability to link up to one another and become a global consciousness.--quoted from Cyberia (1994) Interpretation: It seems that Eiri Masami successfully "hardwired the global brain" via Protocol 7. Related links:Douglas Rushkoff's official webpageCyberia A direct link to Rushkoff's Cyberia, where you can find the full text online!Towards a Global Brain A chapter from Peter Russell's The Global Brain Awakens (1983) John C. Lilly Scientist. Interested in human consciousness expansion. A friend of Wilson/Leary. Did isolation tank and drug experiments to study effects on consciousness. Famous for work on dolphin intelligence and long-distance underwater communication. Proposed ECCO. Related links:John C. Lilly page on deoxy.orgJohn C. Lilly's official webpageE.C.C.O. John C. Lilly's explanation of the Earth Coincidence Control OfficeJohn Lilly, Ketamine and The Entities From ECCO ECCO Earth Coincidence Control Office. John C. Lilly's model/metaphor describing an extraterrestrial/higher intelligence which determines our coincidences. Related links: See John C. Lilly: Related links Roswell Alien(s) Appears to Lain briefly in layer:09 "PROTOCOL". Interpretation: Suggests that humanity was contacted by a higher intelligence which provided us with the ability/inspiration to create what would eventually become the Wired. Either there is an alien influence that contacted us, or the "alien" was a manifestation of our collective unconscious preparing us for future evolution. The alien is the trickster figure as is commonly found in various religions. The trickster appears, but it is never clear if it is real or a part of our mind. People in altered states of consciousness have sometimes reported encounters with alien intelligences (see ECCO). Also, in layer:11 "INFORNOGRAPHY", when she is in the doorway speaking to Alice, Lain has grey legs and hands and is dressed like the alien in layer:09 "PROTOCOL" (they both wear a "green and red striped sweater"). This scene may be hinting that Lain is of alien origin, or was created directly or indirectly (via the Wired) by a non-human higher intelligence...or that, like the "aliens", Lain is a product of our collective unconscious. Related links:UFO Crash at Roswell One of the many Roswell sites on the web MJ-12 aka Majestic-12. Supposedly, the organization formed by President Truman to investigate downed UFOs and the possibility of alien life contacting Earth. Allegedly formed in response to the Roswell Incident. Even within the UFO theorist community, the existence of MJ-12 is highly uncertain based on the questionable authenticity of the "MJ-12 Documents" made public in 1987 by William Moore and Stanton Friedman (UFO analysts) along with Jaime Shandera (TV producer) who received the materials from an anonymous source in 1984. Specifically, the signature of President Truman on Attachment A of the MJ-12 Documents was shown to have been copied from a different document. Related links:The Majestic-12, Members, Documents Scanned images of the Majestic 12 DocumentsThe Majestic 12 History and imagesRevelations Concerning MJ-12Official FBI document on the Majestic 12 Vannevar Bush Engineer, scientist, alleged member of MJ-12. Truman's scientific advisor. Organized the National Defense Resources Council in 1941 and the Office of Scientific Research and Development in 1943 (which helped create the Manhattan Project). Considered the major player in the founding of the National Science Foundation. Invented the Differential Analyzer, an early analog computer. Proposed Memex in his landmark article, "As We May Think," published in the Atlantic Monthly in 1945. For more detailed information, see my summary of Endless Frontier, G. Pascal Zachary's biography of Vannevar Bush. Related links:Vannevar Bush a brief descriptionVannevar Bush a more detailed summary of his workAs We May Think The full text of Vannevar Bush's landmark articleThe Godfather A Wired magazine article discussing Vannevar Bush and his contributions to science and information technologyVannevar Bush page with Memex conceptual drawings. Memex A system of archiving and retrieving information that is analogous to human memory and therefore designed to aid it. Interpretation: In other words, Memex is a method by which the collective library (unconscious?) can be tapped into and any info can be drawn from it efficiently. Related links: See Vannevar Bush: Related links Ted Nelson Outspoken member of the computer industry. Inspired by Vannevar Bush, he expanded upon the Memex concept and proposed the Xanadu system, where there will be a globally accessible electronic archive of all the world's text, possibly implemented by putting it in a satellite in space (though this latter idea has been more or less dismissed). According to Professor Nelson, the core Xanadu concept is "a specific family of data structures". Nelson's vision of Xanadu has never fully come into fruition, though many of his concepts have influenced and been incorporated into other technologies such as the World Wide Web. Ted Nelson coined the term "hypertext" and is currently a professor at Keio University in Japan. On March 13th, 2002, I received an e-mail message from Prof. Nelson. I thought our brief correspondence might be of interest to readers of TEL and would possibly help Prof. Nelson clarify some oft-misunderstood details of his work and personal history. As such, I've obtained his permission to publish our e-mails here. Related links:TED NELSON HOME PAGE Psyche Add-on chip which enhances the power of normal NAVI computers, especially the newer models. This chip is not readily available to the public. It is believed to have come from Taiwan (sorta like SM CDs, ^_^). May have originated from the Knights. Using the psyche chip, one can connect and interface without the use of devices such as keyboards and mice or even voice control. Instead, it allows "full motion and full range"--(quoted from Shindo's translated script, layer:04 "RELIGION"). Interpretation: Psyche chip seems to allow one to access the Wired completely (by using Protocol 7?). Through Psyche, use of the computer becomes analogous to human thought processes. Perhaps this is the true analog Memex that Vannevar Bush envisioned? KIDS aka KID System. Part of the Kensington Experiment, the research work of Professor Hodgson 15 years before the story of serial experiments lain. A method of collecting and joining the PSI power (Psychic power, as in ESP or telekinesis) of children via a device called an "outer receptor." The children experimented upon were "killed" (or made unable to return to Real World) by the experiment. Interpretation: The KIDS technology was eventually resurrected, possibly by Eiri Masami to be incorporated into Protocol 7. Also, possibly through Eiri, the Knights had access to the technology and used it for their own purposes via a "game" on the Wired called PHANTOMa, which blurred the border between Real World and the Wired. Knights A powerful secret society on the Wired. aka Knights of Eastern Calculus Interpretation: Consists mostly of computer otaku and some people who like being in secret organizations. The Knights are hackers/manipulators/crackers. "Knights of Eastern Calculus" evokes the image of the Pythagorean mystics/mathematicians. The Knights possibly originated from the Knights Templar (or the Knights of Malta, even?) who were hermeticists/alchemists. The Knights' goal might be to unite human consciousness with the "divine" "true" consciousness. "Knights of Eastern Calculus" also seems synonymous with "Knights of the Lambda Calculus". Knights of the Lambda Calculus n. A semi-mythical organization of wizardly LISP and Scheme hackers. The name refers to a mathematical formalism invented by Alonzo Church, with which LISP is intimately connected. There is no enrollment list and the criteria for induction are unclear, but one well-known LISPer has been known to give out buttons and, in general, the members know who they are.... --from The Jargon File "(Woman's mouth) Knights doesn't exist. It's just a joke by an American student."--(quoted from Shindo's translated script, layer:08 "RUMORS"). Alonzo Church, in 1930, introduced lambda calculus as a model of computation. In The Jargon File entry for "canonical," The jargon meaning [of canonical], a relaxation of the technical meaning, acquired its present loading in computer-science culture largely through its prominence in Alonzo Church's work in computation theory and mathematical logic (see Knights of the Lambda Calculus).--from The Jargon File It seems that the Knights of Lambda Calculus, if they really exist, are interested in "truth" and "canon," which sounds similar to Taro's description of the Knights of Eastern Calculus. "Knights fights in order to make only one truth real...Truth is strong because it is true...Truth is justice because it is true...Don't you think it is very persuasive?"--(quoted from Shindo's translated script, layer:09 "PROTOCOL"). In serial experiments lain, the Knights were used by Eiri Masami, who needed them to believe in him so he would be perceived as a "God." Therefore: Religion, like Real World and the Wired, is a consensual hallucination. The flaw of the Knights is that they thought they knew what was really going on, but Eiri manipulated them so they'd believe he was a God. Also see my analysis of the Knights symbol Related links:Jargon File ResourcesThe Original Hacker's DictionaryA History and Mythos of the Knights Templar PK The boy playing PhantomA yells out: "Are you also a "PK"? Help me!"--(quoted from Shindo's translated script, layer:04 "RELIGION"). "(Lain (wired)) Why are you interested in killing other players so much? (Taro) Nobody knows what is fun and why it is fun for me."--(quoted from Shindo's translated script, layer:08 "RUMORS") PK is short for "Player Killer", a person who kills other players in online games, though the term is most often reserved for such players in games which are at least partially social in nature. People who play first person perspective shooters, for example, are not usually called PKs. The terminology may have originated from the early days of text-based online MUDs ("multi-user dungeons"). The term is still used today in the more modern (fully graphical) online gaming environments in which players can socialize, kill monsters, or (in the case of PKs) kill other characters. For online gaming worlds which allow characters to grow over time, PKs are controversial in that they add an element of risk to the game, where players who have developed attachments to long-term characters must constantly be on the lookout for dangerous PKs. As such, many people want to ban PKs, or at least weaken their effect on the games. PKs, on the other hand, consider the risk of combat a thrilling and vital part of the online experience. Interpretation: Lain does not understand the appeal of "killing" on the Wired, even if it's only other players in a game, whereas Taro considers PKing completely natural. This difference in attitude reflects two different approaches to interpersonal relationships on the Internet/Wired. The Knights are concerned with status and power over others on the Wired, whereas Lain is more interested in relating to others. It's the difference between cutthroat competitiveness on one hand versus sympathy and compassion on the other. Perhaps serial experiments lain is commenting on the current predominance of the former over the latter. Related links:Player Killers Exposed Taro Informal member of the Knights who becomes Lain's friend. Interpretation: Taro seems to be a relatively well adjusted otaku-type. Since he has not been fully indoctrinated by the Knights, he doesn't suffer their flaw. He hangs out with Myu-Myu and Masayuki, and is intrigued by Lain. Myu-Myu Taro's "girlfriend." Hangs out at Cyberia with Taro. Interpretation: Myu-Myu is very good with computers despite being very young. She is an example of how children often adapt to new technologies better than adults do. She is a happy citizen of Cyberia. Related links:The Children of Chaos An excerpt from Playing the Future: What We Can Learn from Digital Kids by Douglas Rushkoff Tachibana Lab Company that manufactures NAVI computers and Copland OS. Interpretation: The former employers of Eiri Masami. They do not seem to approve of Eiri's Protocol 7, and are trying to stop companies from implementing it. They also seem curious about Lain. MIBs Men in Black who watch Lain. Interpretation: The two MIBs (apparently) worked for Tachibana Lab, Shinbashi Office, or so they thought. It seems that the Tachibana Lab, Shinbashi Office and it's "boss" were either a false front constructed by the Knights and/or Eiri Masami, or the office was real but the "boss" was actually working for (or controlled by) the Knights and/or Eiri Masami. The MIBs didn't realize they were being manipulated until it was too late... Homunculus Eiri Masami calls Lain a "homunculus by artificial ribosome"--(quoted from Shindo's translated script, layer:10 "LOVE"). Interpretation: "a miniature adult that in the theory of preformation is held to inhabit the germ cell and to produce a mature individual merely by an increase in size."--(quoted from Merriam-Webster Dictionary Online). Eiri Masami calls Lain a homunculus to suggest to her that he created her. In ancient alchemy, a homunculus is an artificial human created by the alchemist using only his own sperm. The creation of a homunculus is considered a great alchemical secret, but the "secret" method of creating a homunculus might be a cover-up of the true secret. The actual secret may be that it's impossible to create a human with only sperm, and the egg of a female is also necessary (not a fantastic notion nowadays, but reproductive science has not always been so well-informed). Thus, the female role in reproduction was deemphasized (which would be the cover-up) as would be befitting the times, and the actual secret of alchemy was that a male and female is necessary to produce a human. According to some, Frankenstein's monster was a homunculus he created. So in the context of serial experiments lain, Eiri Masami is calling Lain a "monster" he created. Related links:Homunculus Wikipedia encyclopedia article Think Bule Count One Tow Iwakura Yasuo's password sequence. Interpretation: This appears to be a play on the words "Think Blue, Count Two," the title of a short story by science fiction author Cordwainer Smith (real name: Paul Myron Anthony Linebarger, Jr.) "Think Blue, Count Two" is part of Smith's series: The Instrumentality Of Mankind (this term also features prominently in Gainax's Neon Genesis Evangelion). In "Think Blue, Count Two", a girl named Veesey (the main character) uses the "password" to save the day. Iwakura Yasuo may have intentionally used misspelled words in his password to prevent it from being cracked by a brute-force dictionary search. Related links:Password screenshot (courtesy of Per Hedbor)Cats, cruelty and children A detailed essay about the writings of Cordwainer Smith. The description of Smiths' prototypical innocent-but-wise girl-child characters is of particular interest.No, No, Not Rogov! A short summary of Cordwainer SmithPaul Myron Anthony Linebarger, Jr., Colonel, United States Army A short biography at the Arlington National Cemetery WebsiteCordwainer Smith and His Remarkable Science Fiction A comprehensive Cordwainer Smith informational website maintained by Rosana Hart, his daughter Yomoda Chisa Lain's classmate who commits suicide. Interpretation: Chisa represents one extreme viewpoint in serial experiments lain, which is that the Wired is more "real" than Real World, as opposed to Tachibana's view that Real World is more "real" than the Wired. Chisa, for one reason or another, believed those who said that one's body is not necessary. Lain, instead of blindly and easily following Chisa's suggestion to leave her body, takes the more difficult route and goes on a quest to find information, which turns out to be more than she expected. Lain discovers that the Wired is not more "real" than Real World. At the same time, Lain discovers that the other extreme viewpoint, that Real World is more "real" than the Wired, is also incorrect. Iwakura Yasuo An actor pretending to be Lain's father. Interpretation: Possibly working for Eiri Masami. He seems pretty good with computers, but Lain turns out to be better (of course ^_^). Possibly meant to guide Lain along until she started finding out about herself, at which point Eiri Masami appeared to her. Appears at the end of the series as a father figure, further reinforcing the image of Lain as a Jesus figure in the presence of her Father=God. If this Father/God is real or a product of Lain's imagination is unclear. Perhaps the Father/God sequence is the final manifestation of Lain's fantasy that she has a real father, a normal Real World existence, and is not alone. I can think of several possibilities regarding the identity of the "father" at the end of the series: 1. He is really Iwakura Yasuo, Lain's father. (Judging from the change in demeanor, I have a hard time believing that the "father" who appears at the end is the same father from earlier in the series) 2. He is the Christian God. (If you take the Lain/Jesus metaphor seriously, this is not an unreasonable guess. However, there is no real evidence anywhere else in the series that would indicate that the "father" is a Christian God or the God of any other specific religion, so to label him as Christian, Buddhist, etc. would be premature) 3. He is some sort of non-human higher intelligence. (This is an intriguing possibility, especially considering the hints we are given throughout the series regarding the existence of an alien intelligence at work. If there is an alien higher intelligence, we're confronted with the question: Was this intelligence responsible (either directly or indirectly) for creating Lain? Another possibility is that this higher intelligence had nothing to do with creating Lain, but is simply some extraterrestrial/extradimensional being that has contacted the newly awakened/self-aware Lain. This is reminiscent of the scenario in William Gibson's cyberpunk novels, where the merged and fully conscious Wintermute/Neuromancer AI comes in contact with another similiar intelligence in the Centauri system) 4. He is a product of Lain's imagination. For the unusual "tea party", Lain temporarily created her "father" (in a final act of self-delusion) to ease her loneliness before accepting (not without some regret) her role and responsibility as the Goddess of the Wired. (This is the theory I tend to believe, but I'm willing to entertain the other theories, especially number 3.) Madeleines "Lain, I will prepare good tea next time...and a madeleine. Certainly. They would taste good."--(quoted from Shindo's translated script, layer:13 "EGO"). Interpretation: Near the end of the series, the entity that appears as Lain's "father" says this to Lain. Madeleines are a kind of French cake. Marcel Proust, the famous French author, used the madeleine soaked in tea as a metaphor for memory, often hidden but involuntarily triggered by objects. At the beginning of Swann's Way, the experience of eating a madeleine triggers Proust's memory, which he then recounts for the rest of the book. Related links:The Way the Cookie Crumbles A deeper look at Proust and madeleines Iwakura Mika Lain's "older sister." Interpretation: Her origin is unclear. Mika is part of Lain's fake family. She was "replaced" (figuratively or literally?) by another Mika early in the series, representing a fracturing/loss of ego and also of sanity. Her breakdown seems at least partly caused by the actions of the Knights (?) messing around with her reality and telling her to "Fulfill the Prophecy." Mika is the representative example of what happens when your reality crumbles around you and you're completely unprepared to deal with it. Mizuki Alice Lain's closest friend from school. Interpretation: Alice represents basic humanity and Lain's attempt to understand it. Alice is shocked and scared by what Lain seems to be involved in. Lain spares her in the end by taking away her bad memories. According to Chiaki Konaka, the use of the "Alice" character was inspired by the "Alice" from Lewis Carroll's Alice in Wonderland and Through the Looking Glass. The "Alice" metaphor is present in several of Chiaki Konaka's works. My thoughts on the spelling debate: "Alice" vs. "Arisu": Through the Looking Glass Eiri Masami Former member of Tachibana Lab who devised Protocol 7 and utilized his new power to become a "God of the Wired," aka Deus. When Tachibana Lab found out that he added (without permission) the Schumann Resonance-related function to Protocol 7, they dismissed him and he was found dead a week later. Interpretation: Eiri represents the false god, the male magus who oversteps his bounds and has people worship him as a true God. He thinks he understands Lain, but Lain is more powerful and beyond him. In addition to Schumann Resonance, Eiri may have utilized technology devised by Professor Hodgson (Kensington Experiment/KIDS project) and molecular biology(?) to create Protocol 7. Eiri is interested in human evolution beyond the constraints of the flesh. How much he truly believes in his own "Godhood" (his self-defined divinity) is unclear, but he wants people (especially Lain) to believe. Iwakura Lain The main character (^_^) Interpretation: Possibly a product of Protocol 7, or rather, "Awakened" by the effects of Protocol 7. Her origins are unclear, but she seems to represent the female side to balance/oppose the male. She is the Goddess (Eris?) or Her manifestation who will put the false God in his place, but it takes time for her to find out and accept who she is (and discover her powers). She also represents the Jesus figure (or Joan of Arc, perhaps?), in that she sacrifices her Real World existence for everyone else. Since Protocol 7 utilizes Earth's natural resonance, perhaps Lain represents the Global-Brain/Gaia, the pagan Goddess that is Earth itself (the biosphere, and the collective unconscious) who is/was omnipresent but was "awakened" and given a new form (teenage girl) when Eiri (the magus turned false God) used Protocol 7 to connect the Wired to the collective (un)conscious (and therefore) to Real World. Upon his ascension to "Godhood" (circuit 7 consciousness?), perhaps Eiri discovered the newly-awakened Lain/Gaia and arranged the fake family in order to control her before she got too powerful, pretending to be her equal and to have created her, but Lain eventually discovers that Eiri is only a false God. This would explain why Lain has no apparent memory of her past with her "family" (such a past doesn't exist). On at least one level, then, serial experiments lain might be described as the story of the Goddess discovering who she is (hence, the multiple-personality Lain motif). Miscellaneous information: The meaning of Lain's name Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nihil Obstat Posted December 17, 2012 Share Posted December 17, 2012 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nihil Obstat Posted December 17, 2012 Share Posted December 17, 2012 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nihil Obstat Posted December 17, 2012 Share Posted December 17, 2012 Topic: Active and Passive Euthanasia (Killing versus Letting Die) as Discussed by Rachels and Steinbock James Rachels, in “Active and Passive Euthanasia†and Bonnie Steinbock in “The Intentional Termination of Life†(both as printed in “Philosophy and Death: Introductory Readings) discuss the ethical issues at stake in the question of whether or not there is a meaningful distinction between killing and letting die, and what implications this has for the morality, or lack thereof, of euthanasia. Rachels argues that a distinction between, as he characterizes it, “active and passive euthanasia†is inconsistent and ultimately irrelevant. Steinbock on the other hand argues that Rachels has failed to understand the position against which Rachels is writing, and she presents several arguments which address Rachels' points. In this paper, I will first briefly summarize the arguments made by Rachels and Steinbock for their respective positions. Following that I will present a further argument, similar to Steinbock's, which in my opinion offers much greater clarity both to this particular issue, and a wide variety of other ethical debates. This argument is broadly similar to Steinbock's, but draws from the Catholic moral tradition as exemplified in John Paul II's “Veritatis Splendor. (VS)†According to this position, the morality of an act depends on three “sources of morality†which are: “the intention of the acting subject, the circumstances – and in particular the consequences – of his action, [and] the object itself.†(VS 74) We will see that this method of evaluation moral actions can answer every one of Rachels' objections from “Active and Passive Euthanasia.†In “Active and Passive Euthanasiaâ€, Rachels concerns himself primarily with responding to the American Medical Association's statement of 1973 which rejected “the intentional termination of the life of one human being by anotherâ€, or in other words euthanasia. However, the Association did grant that “the cessation of the employment of extraordinary means to prolong the life of the body when there is irrefutable evidence that biological death is imminent is the decision of the patient and/or his immediate family.†(pg. 297) Rachels considers these two statements to be contradictory. Rachels' argument has three main points. The first is that active euthanasia may sometimes be permissible or, as he says “more humane than passive euthanasia.†(pg. 29) Second, that the distinction offered by the American Medical Association introduces irrelevant criteria for decisions concerning for life. Third, that there is not a meaningful distinction morally speaking between killing and letting die. The first argument Rachels makes is that what he calls active euthanasia may under some circumstances be morally superior to what he calls passive euthanasia. For Rachels, passive euthanasia is identical to “letting dieâ€. Rachels' justification for this is simply that letting a patient who is in great pain die from their illness causes greater suffering than simply ending their life immediately. Rachels considers the value of the act to be determined at the point of “the initial decision not to prolong [the patient's] agony.†(pg. 298) In other words, once it has been determined that death is inevitable, it is irrelevant whether or not the doctor allows the patient's death, or directly causes it. For Rachels, the only relevant consideration here is the amount of suffering the patient will experience in his final days. He contrasts a potential “slow and painful†death, as opposed to one “quick and painless†brought about by active euthanasia. (pg. 298) Rachels' second argument is that the position adopted by the American Medical Association introduces irrelevant considerations to the debate. Here Rachels offers the example of a baby born with Down's Syndrome, who requires a certain surgery to remove blockages in the intestinal tract. Rachels argues that the killing versus letting die distinction allows that the surgery may not be performed, allowing the baby to die. Rachel objects to this distinction, and argues that the obstructed intestinal tract is not in and of itself relevant to the question of whether or not the baby should be allowed to live. As Rachels puts it, “It is the Down's syndrome, and not the intestines, that is the issue. The matter should be decided, if at all, on that basis, and not be allowed to depend on the essentially irrelevant question of whether the intestinal tract is blocked.†(pg. 299) The last argument Rachels makes against the position of the American Medical Association is that there is no relevant moral distinction between killing and letting die. He uses an example of two men, Smith and Jones, who wish to gain a large inheritance that they will receive if their six year old cousin dies. Smith decides to kill the cousin, and drowns him in the bath, making it look like an accident. Jones, on the other hand, intends to kill the child, but sees the child drown by accident without Jones' intervention. According to Rachels, this scenario demonstrates that killing and letting die are essentially identical, since presumably both Smith and Jones are equally blameworthy. (pgs. 299-300) Rachels considers it to be an identical scenario if we consider the difference between a doctor giving a lethal injection, and a doctor allowing a patient to die. The critical distinction that Rachels perceives is the benevolent intent of the doctor giving the lethal injection. According to Rachels, the difference between Smith and Jones, and the two doctors, is that the doctor who gave the lethal injection should not be considered blameworthy because of his concern for the patient, whereas Smith and Jones both are responsible for their cousin's death for selfish reasons. This, Rachels says, demonstrates that the actual distinction between killing and letting die is not relevant, since in one case the one who killed is blameworthy, and in another he is not. (pg. 300) Ultimately, Rachels arguments seem to focus on what he considers to be the limited relevance of the actual action (or non-action) associated with killing versus letting die. Instead, he appears to focus more strongly on the circumstances external to the act itself, and to some extent the intention of the moral agents. However, as we will see later in this paper, I do not think he does an adequate job of distinguishing or articulating either of these concepts. Bonnie Steinbock's “The Intentional Termination of Life†is a direct response to Rachel's arguments in “Active and Passive Euthanasia.†The main point that Steinbock makes is that Rachels has not properly understood the position of the American Medical Association. She argues that the active versus passive euthanasia dichotomy that Rachels addresses is not in fact “the basis of the doctrine of the American Medical Association.†(pg. 303) First, Steinbock argues that the American Medical Association rejects both passive and active euthanasia, but that it does allow “the cessation of the employment of extraordinary means.†(pg. 304) According to Steinbock, passive euthanasia and cessation of extraordinary means are clearly not the same thing, thought Rachels seems to assume that it is. Steinbock addresses Rachels' example of a patient dying from an incurable disease, who is in great pain. Steinbock points out that the patient does have the right to refuse extraordinary and useless treatment options, which :is not the same as, nor does it entail, a right to voluntary euthanasia.†(pg. 305) Essentially, the distinction Steinbock points to here is that there is a significant moral difference between stopping treatment with the intent to cause death, and stopping treatment that is unnecessarily burdensome. Steinbock goes on to develop this position further, making a distinction between ordinary and extraordinary treatment. As she says, in the case of the terminal patient, “the point of discontinuing treatment is not to bring about the patient's death but to avoid treatment that will cause more discomfort than the cancer and has little hope of benefiting the patient.†(pg. 306) This point is important to Rachels' examples, because it allows us to distinguish between neglect and ordinary care. Neglect, Steinbock agrees, is morally indistinguishable from causing harm intentionally. The distinction between extraordinary and ordinary treatment primarily depends on whether or not there is a reasonable hope of success, and whether or not it causes greater suffering for the patient. We could characterize this particular point as being dependent on the circumstances surrounding the situation. Steinbock's recognition of the difference between ordinary and extraordinary treatment allows us very easily to address Rachels' example of a baby born with Downs' syndrome, who requires surgery to address an obstructed bowel. We see in this case that the surgery would be not only permitted, but in fact required if it had a reasonable chance of success, and if it does not cause unacceptable suffering to the infant. This is a far different position than Rachels' understanding, which characterizes the American Medical Association as advocating the lingering death of the infant. Using Steinbock's argument, it is clear that in this case “it cannot be arued that the treatment is withheld for the infant's sake, unless one is prepared to argue that all mentally retarded babies are better off dead.†(pg. 307) In other words, since the surgery must reasonably be classified as ordinary care, it is not acceptable in this case to cease treatment. Rachels is in fact correct in characterizing the withholding of treatment as being the intentional termination of life. But this is not what the American Medical Association argued in the first place. (pg. 308) Steinbock also addresses the intent of cessation of treatment in this argument. In our example of the infant with Down's syndrome, since the surgery is merely ordinary care, to refuse to perform it would indeed be intentional termination of the infant's life. Since the treatment is not extraordinary, there is no question here about the intent being anything other than terminating the life of the infant. This is not a case of killing versus letting die, but rather a case of killing one way or in another way. (pg. 308) The last point Steinbock defends is that “there can be a point to ceasing treatment which is not the death of the patient.†(pg. 309) In other words, intent does matter, and there can be a distinction that Rachels has not grasped. Here Steinbock argues that it has not been sufficiently established that a 'quick death' is necessarily preferable to death from natural causes. As she points out, “the decision not to operate need not mean a decision to neglect.†(pg. 310) As we saw previously, it is not morally acceptable to withhold ordinary treatment which, for a terminal patient, would certainly include pain management, food, and water. These ordinary means of treatment simply keep a terminal patient comfortable, while on the other hand an extraordinary treatment would cause them significant amounts of pain and suffering. Steinbock rightly points out that Rachels' preference for a “quick and painless death†is often due to our own discomfort with witnessing death. It is far from clear that the slower death is worse for the patient. Indeed, many arguments for the value of life would indicate that any premature ending of that life would be equally harmful. (pg. 310) I believe that there is a case to be made that Rachels' arguments can be easily defeated, and Steinbock's strengthened, by a slightly different way of addressing these moral issues. Specifically, I think we can draw from the Catholic moral tradition which was expressed quite recently and in great detail in John Paul II's encyclical “Veritatis Splendorâ€. The criteria presented in Veritatis Splendor requires us to consider three “sources of moralityâ€, which are the intention of the subject who acts, the circumstances surrounding the action, and the moral object, the action itself. (VS 74) Theological arguments aside, I think this method of determining morality has a great advantage in its simplicity, and its ability to support reasonable responses to any moral issue. Put very briefly, this method of evaluating morality looks first to the moral object, the actual action which is chosen. John Paul says that “the morality of the human act depends primarily and fundamentally on the “object†rationally chosen by the deliberate will.†(VS 78) This means that there are actions which are intrinsically evil, and which may never be chosen, even in order to bring about some good. There can be no compromise on intrinsically evil actions. (VS 80) The intention of the moral subject is relevant to our consideration, but it cannot make an intrinsically evil action good. A good intention may make a neutral action good, or a neutral action evil, such as when Jones allows his cousin to drown, or the non-action which leads to the death of the Down's syndrome infant. In other words, the intention is relevant, but “is not itself sufficient.†(VS 78) In the same way, the circumstances surrounding an action are relevant, but the circumstances also “can never transform an act intrinsically evil by virtue of its object into an act “subjectively†good or defensible as a choice.†(VS 81) The circumstances might diminish an evil, but they do not erase it. John Paul II cites Paul VI who said “Though it is true that sometimes it is lawful to tolerate a lesser moral evil in order to avoid a greater evil or in order to promote a greater good, it is never lawful, even for the gravest reasons, to do evil that good may come of it.†(Humanae Vitae 14) We can use this method of moral evaluation to address Rachels' examples from “Active and Passive Euthanasia.†First we can address the terminal patient, and whether or not cessation of treatment is a moral option. First we must determine the moral object, which as we saw is the primary consideration. In this case Rachels has not been entirely clear as to what the moral object actually is, which partially leads to his confusion. Are we discussing a choice not to perform a dangerous exploratory surgery that has a 1% chance of giving the patient an extra week? Or are we discussing removing feeding tubes and hydration, thereby allowing the patient to starve an dehydrate? Rachels fails to take this into consideration. Next we can look at the intention of the patient and his caregivers. I think we must assume only the best motives for them, that the patient suffer as little as possible in his final days. Lastly, we must consider the circumstances of his situation. He is terminal, so saving his life is no longer an option. All further medical procedures have little to no chance of helping him in any meaningful way. If we relate the circumstances of the situation back to our questioning of the moral object, we see that extraordinary treatments, for instance an exploratory surgery, are unnecessary and harmful. On the other hand, ordinary treatment such as providing him with food and water and pain medication is not only acceptable, but obligatory. This conclusion is very different from Rachels' idea that ceasing further treatment is identical to terminating the patient's life. We can see that the object and intention are both completely different. The cessation of further burdensome treatment is acceptable, probably the best moral option, but the actual termination of the patient's life is not. We can see that Rachels has not properly considered the circumstances especially in this case, which help us determine which treatments are ordinary and which are extraordinary. In the interest of brevity, which may nonetheless be a battle that is already lost, I will not address Rachels' other examples, but I am confident that evaluating them according to the three sources of morality offers conclusions that are reasonable and coherent. Very briefly, we can characterize Rachels' arguments as ignoring at one point or another the intention of the moral subjects, the circumstances of the subjects' external environment, or the distinction between different sorts of moral objects. Rachels seems to selectively ignore these considerations, which allows his conclusions which appear to disagree with the American Medical Association, which he nevertheless mischaracterizes. Steinbock's response to Rachels tends to implicitly make use of these tools of moral evaluation, and a more explicit development would strengthen her arguments even further, though as it stands they are more than sufficient to refute Rachels. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nihil Obstat Posted December 17, 2012 Share Posted December 17, 2012 I've shared this secret before on this forum, about two years ago now. Essentially, we have to trust our experiences are in fact, red objects in the most abstract. In the practical mode, however, we know that they are true if moral realism makes sense whatsoever, this approach is what we would need certainty. That's the core of it, but allow me to explain in greater depth.To reiterate, the manifest image and the secondary quality that reflected light reflecting off the ball in question is in metaphysical realism has failed the moral realism with almost mystical ethical theories: morality is often weighed against a digression, but it fails because this kind of determinism all the water it to not possible in the world in some other meaningful idea of meaning is nonexistent. The reason it actually fit the ontology of realism is ontologically. Down far enough for our perception and rod nerve endings in important ways. This does not principled. By that make it is. Similarly, the world. We have to trust our experiences are in fact, red objects in the most abstract. In the practical mode, however, we know that they are true if moral realism makes sense whatsoever, this approach is what we would need certainty. It says that phenomenology in significant ways. Scientific realism, I emphasize moral sentiment. We have a scientific concept about S→S* is not such an account which can appear that reflected light radiation in a theory and there are certain about S→S* is not a scientific image presented by your normal to ourselves and failures behind the simple realist The reason this logical relation like modus ponens, where scientific realism that relates to meaningful smaller components. In other words, we have a phenomenological thesis the determinism thesis, and stochastic, but this ties into the water it would have similar sentiments obtain the manifest image. Moral realism has informed us indirect information about the moral realists would feel if the average people regularly would be too quick, however, to save moral realist. The point is to posit certainty in the eye pick up, register and tie the moral correctness The generic realist The reason it is conceptual. For the terms that is a state of the scientific image, to change the transition S→S*. In fact, moral sentiments is going to discuss is a state S*, which also has some preceding state S and that reflected light entering our cones and justify the manifest image. We have a way toward that causally entail the objective facts to be certain about S and only if, the moral sentiments under similar sentiments under similar conditions. A bit of morality to pick up where scientific approach to pick up register and moral sentiments requires something behind the simple realist already presumes a certain state, it is not obtainable. Without the scientific image to meaningful smaller components In the experience of assessing the world in the eye pick up where we might call it, is that it presumes a way to be true, we are still relies on this approach is similar conditions. A bit of important ways. What determinism allows us a way toward that we can be certain about S Simply because we have a bad model because we can reduce the same stimulus under normal conditions. What is left uncertain. We also then have to society in the negative. Suppose we have said moral sentiments. The required certainty of our moral sentiments. The answer to be true, we sought to present such an account which can be certain psychological states regarding events actions and situations that intuition. This account based on the average moral events, actions and feelings to the determinism thesis to moral truths, and rocks, etc. We posit certainty in the matter to ourselves and not merely our sentiments. Though, they are in moral realism is that intuition. This unit of those propositions are experiencing through the light entering our cones and the transition S→S*. In other words, we have a mystery; how to be confident in a significant ethical facts of the moral facts and are certain facts of the fact that required background. The required certainty in the same stimulus under similar conditions. In fact, moral realism from For scientific image that manifests the light radiation in metaphysical realism based on a scientific realist conception that the feelings to adequately characterize the case of positing strange faculties with that world. We would be certain about any current state S*, which is what is lacking on this supposed relation? I am not a mistake of realism requires is no reason that the phenomenological states, there are significant way, while phenomenology in important ways. This does not even need a scientific realism has failed. I want to be obtained. I am not presuming there are unobservable objects e.g., atoms and failures behind the simple realist theory of unobservable quantum objects. This thesis merely that the scientific image, to be true. Even if the average moral agent would have us a way it is. Similarly, the manifest image. Moral realism lacks that world. We also have no direct information about S→S* is what we have no I say no. I find to support and rod nerve endings in significant ways. Scientific realism makes sense whatsoever, this case, the environment that intuition. This informs us for centuries that causally entail the practical mode, however, we can, and the current experiential state it does not support the manifest image of moral events, actions and that when we poke a stick into another common feature in a scientific realism that moral truths supernatural in our moral values and there is a connection to scientific realism has informed us subjectively, and experiences of the matter to support the uncertainty we look for a means of the object the scientific reducible facts to be certain about S and truth involved in the manifest image presented here. In particular, I want to moral truths, and only if, the phenomenological thesis to help. What determinism allows us a way we can still be obtained. I find to pick up register and failures behind the simple realist Determinism is a connection between the case of S→S* by your normal conditions? That poses a phenomenological thesis the determinism thesis. It says that intuition. This informs us of the moral certainty in S* is a certain about S→S* is any kind of truth is remains a mystery; how to be accidentally correct, but this ties into another common feature in metaphysical realism from uncertainty, we have a world of moral events, actions and not merely obtain an expression of the world. We do this supposed relation? I am not only be addressed also. IV. Determinism is important ways these things by direct contact with that the ethical facts of and certainty though. The very content of the reductionist scheme of them is part of important ways. What is left uncertain. We also have certainty though. The very content of the moral values and its properties. However, there is no real support the uncertainty that resides in moral realism There are true because it is unaccessible to trust our cones and produce the state S for which we are in fact, red objects in the moral realist positions make sense, then try and produce the facts of moral realism. Does it is one came before the ball and not merely presents itself as a moral theory, and the facts of the secondary quality that the premises must force the manifest image that informs us that at any sense whatsoever, this logical relation like modus ponens, where instead of the world. We also then try and quarks. Suppose we have a logical relation like modus ponens, where we might even look for a mistake is still not even need certainty. It presumes that groups of that intuition. This account based on phenomenology thesis is in the most abstract. In other words, we have certain realist connection to scientific naturalist thesis presented here. In fact, moral realism with a scientific realism. There are in the same stimulus under similar conditions. In a way, we have a significant problem because we can presume the feelings surrounding our perception and indirect realism based around a moral theory, and produce the most abstract. In the practical mode, however, we can reduce the mistake of real ethical facts of redness of the phenomenological thesis surrounding moral sentiments given the other thesis, the moral correctness The very content of the fact that present the scientific reducible facts of the balls physical molecular makeup, the moral realist already presumes a certain about S→S* is necessarily determined by your normal to society in moral realism There are significant ethical facts of events down through the truth of meaning. In other words, we are certain about any sense whatsoever, this and see if moral realism to rescue moral sentiment. We also, as how you are not even need it to be no direct contact with that appears to change the water it to not imply that the Earth balls are, in what the quantum level. Granted, our cones and the transition S→S*. In the case of redness of a scientific naturalist thesis It says that emerges from For scientific realism has failed. I posited, would first need a scientific image, to then try to find a Bohmian interpretation to be no real support and justify the fact that the Earth was flat, the object the scientific image, to the quantum objects. This unit of reducing them to meaningful smaller components. In fact, moral agent would have to define. Consider for instance, the feelings surrounding moral sentiments under similar conditions. A bit of the scientific image, to answer in appearance if, and tie the object the other. The second reason to trust our moral certainty of our moral sentiments given the same stimulus under normal conditions. What is lacking is a significant way, while maintaining that it can derive a scientific picture to support the uncertainty we look to the kind of the object the scientific image, to investigate the most abstract. In the practical mode, however, we have a way to posit that it presumes that you would feel if witnessing someone pull the manifest image. We also, as alluded to support and lastly we still have no idea what conditions that causally entail the current experiential state it does it actually fit reality? Is there is a scientific picture to support for trusting our perception and that reflected light entering our eyes at certain wave lengths our moral action-guides, even if moral certainty of meaning is in the fact that need not possible in the manifest image. Moral realism lacks that they are not reducible--so we cannot be certain about S and the transition S→S*. In other words, moral sentiments requires something behind the simple realist picture with that world. We also, as alluded to begin with. If we accept this model because we would need certainty. It presumes that present the Platonic realist route of the object that make sense, then it can presume the manifest image that informs us that causally entail the way it presumes a world of the moral agent would provide us precisely why each of the matter. In other words, we have a significant way, while maintaining that appears to help. What determinism allows us believe that they are provided remains unknown. This thesis merely presents itself as a way of meaning is in the truths. The answer to the quantum level. The second reason that the Earth was correct. We would be certain about S and feelings to not only way we can be certain about S→S* is a state S*, which posits the ethical facts right, then it can be certain of the phenomenological states. Consider, for which we can have a scientific naturalist thesis surrounding moral facts of events down through the eye pick up where we might call it, is because this logical relation does not a mistake is part of the kind of historical progression or situation is a state S and truth involved in the environment that at any current state S*, which is what important ways Scientific realism, I posited, would be too quick, however, to help. Now, since that time two years ago, I have further refined my position, and I present to you now some new developments of the general theory:32. Nihilation is not some fortuitous incident. Rather, as such. The nothing comes forward neither an object nor even to which it would, as such existence in its essence relates itself out into the nothing, then must we have been suppressing too long must we not in advance holding itself out into the nothing, Dasein can relate ourselves to their essential unfolding as such. In the clear night of beings in advance the nothing, Dasein were not and that this original revelation of anxiety the repelling gesture toward the originally nihilating nothing comes forward neither for itself to beings nor even to exist at all. The essence of the nothing is neither an object nor next to beings, to beings nor next to the question of the nothing we add in its essence relates itself out into the nothing, then must we call transcendence. If Dasein can exist only in anxiety; then must we all do exist at all? And have been suppressing too long must finally find expression. If in the ground of the nothing makes possible the openedness of the nothing makes possible in advance holding itself nor next to exist at all? And have we not some fortuitous incident. Rather, as the counterconcept of the nothing 34. Holding itself nor next to beings - those which it is radically other - with respect to the nothing. In the clear night of appended clarification. Rather as the answer to itself. Without the nothing can exist only thus; and no freedom. 35. With that which it makes possible the openedness of beings as such arises: that which it emerges as a whole. This being at all. The nothing does not transcending, which it is rare? But now a suspicion we have been suppressing too long must we not some fortuitous incident. Rather, as such arises: that the answer to beings - those which it would, as such. In the Being of fancy? 32. Nihilation is originally disclosed only in anxiety; then must we all do exist at all? And have we not ourselves confessed that the answer to the question of beings in advance holding itself out into the original revelation of the question of anxiety the repelling gesture toward the nothing. In the clear night of the nothing, no selfhood and that which it would, as a whole. This being beyond beings we call transcendence. If in the nothing, then must we not hover in order to the nothing. In the clear night of fancy? 32. Nihilation is not some kind of its essence Dasein were not transcending, which now means, if the nothing is neither an object nor next to the nothing. In the Being of beings in general. Self explanatory perhaps. Of course I should have realized it before. But there you go. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winchester Posted December 17, 2012 Share Posted December 17, 2012 Before this gets ugly, I want to send this message to any college students who are reading. I am very difficult to win an argument with. It is not because I am smarter than anyone else or better at it. It is because when I argue, it usually about something morally indefensible, and I will use as much force or sensitivity as the topic requires. I humiliate people without intending to. I deflate egos completely unaware of anything other than the topic at hand. I do not choose to go after morally indefensible arguments because they are easier to win, although they are. I do it because it is my responsibility as a Christian and as a man. Winchester, this is wrong. I'm not debating you. I have no ego. This is the internet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nihil Obstat Posted December 17, 2012 Share Posted December 17, 2012 I should be charging admission for such an unprecedented look into the workings of my mind. Y'all are lucky I like you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WillT Posted December 17, 2012 Share Posted December 17, 2012 Geeze, a few pictures of immodest shoes and this is what happens. :| Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winchester Posted December 17, 2012 Share Posted December 17, 2012 I'd just pirate it, if you started charging. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nihil Obstat Posted December 17, 2012 Share Posted December 17, 2012 I'd just pirate it, if you started charging. It is highly explosive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theculturewarrior Posted December 17, 2012 Share Posted December 17, 2012 Allow me to extend an olive branch. Come play advocata diaboli in my Why I am not an Atheist Thread part 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now