Jump to content
An Old School Catholic Message Board

Did The "pro-life" Movement Permanently Change Because Of Romn


southern california guy

Recommended Posts

I wasn't the guy making the grandiose claim that a politician "permanently changed" the pro-life movement simply by running in a national election.

 

But you are the guy implying that winning a national election is the only means of changing jack. You really should get involved in nullification. All the cool kids are supporting it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But you are the guy implying that winning a national election is the only means of changing jack. You really should get involved in nullification. All the cool kids are supporting it.

 

Shut up, Donnie.  You're out of your league.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shut up, Donnie.  You're out of your league.

 

My understanding of that movie is deeper than your understanding of that movie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My understanding of that movie is deeper than your understanding of that movie.

 

I do not doubt you deeply need to believe that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do not doubt you deeply need to believe that.

 

You are lucky that the 'rule' against splitting infinitives is not actually a real rule of the English language. :proud:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

southern california guy

I wasn't the guy making the grandiose claim that a politician "permanently changed" the pro-life movement simply by running in a national election.

 

Organizations change, movements change, people change their opinions and positions....  Sorry it happens.

 

If the National Right to Life, and other Pro-life organizations gave their support to Romney -- who believed that it was ok to kill a baby to protect the emotional health of the mother (In cases of rape, incest, etc..) -- did that mean that they agreed with him? 

 

Roe V Wade was argued on the basis that concerns for a womans health had to balanced against the unborn babies right to life.

 

I was speculating that many "pro-lifers" actually agreed with Romney --  and now believe that abortion is necessary to protect the "health" of the mother.

 

By ignoring my argument and suggesting that I had made a "grandiose claim" you seem to be trying to be trying to make me appear ridiculous rather than debating the issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...