Jump to content
An Old School Catholic Message Board

My Book List For Fall 2012


Nihil Obstat

Recommended Posts

I want your schedule. I'll trade you an early Christian writings seminar? I kid, but I'm so jealous. If I wasn't such an overachiever, I'd have the time to take more philosophy. :sad2:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Marie-Therese' timestamp='1346822677' post='2478654']
I've read Sartre and Heidegger...are you taking existentialist philosophy this semester? I read Sartre quite a bit in the existentialist class I had early on in college, along with Nietzsche, Simone de Beauvoir, and a few others. I found Sartre fascinating.
[/quote]

The class is a 20th century special topics course, but I think we are mostly focussing on existentialism.

Edited by Nihil Obstat
Link to comment
Share on other sites

All my textbooks this semester have the words archeology or anthropology on the cover. If I had your books, I'd jump off the High Level Bridge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

carmenchristi

[quote name='Papist' timestamp='1346806760' post='2478496']
He can get those on video.
[/quote]

mmmm.... probably better to use Cliff's Notes ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Started hard into the metaphysics of death today. Pretty fun so far. Began with Epicurus and Lucretius, then skipped ahead a bit to Nagel (just a little bit of a leap). I'm anticipating at this point trying to refute Epicurus and Lucretius, but I'm not particularly a fan at this point of the possible worlds argument Nagel uses. I'm wondering instead if I could come from an Aristotelian/Aquinian direction and demonstrate life as a positive reality, and the state of death as essentially a negation of being, therefore a negation of good, therefore evil/bad in and of itself.

At the moment I'm reading Heidegger's "What Is Metaphysics?". Never before have I thought so hard about nothing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not The Philosopher

[quote name='Nihil Obstat' timestamp='1347518434' post='2481943']

At the moment I'm reading Heidegger's "What Is Metaphysics?". Never before have I thought so hard about nothing.
[/quote]

Don't let yourself get all worked up over nothing.

(I had to say it)

Actually, I've been feeling a strange urge to crack open [i]Being and Time[/i] lately...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not The Philosopher

His essays on poetry made me feel otherwise a couple of years back. Though that was a time when I was more than a little fed up with continental philosophy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Not The Philosopher' timestamp='1347553575' post='2482011']
His essays on poetry made me feel otherwise a couple of years back. Though that was a time when I was more than a little fed up with continental philosophy.
[/quote]

I definitely felt that way about Hegel last year... I dislike him very strongly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Winchester' timestamp='1346862666' post='2478774']
I'd like to read the works of Nietzsche. But only if they've been tattooed onto a woman.
[/quote]

An anarchist woman, right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not The Philosopher

[quote name='Nihil Obstat' timestamp='1347556131' post='2482022']
I definitely felt that way about Hegel last year... I dislike him very strongly.
[/quote]

I actually liked the [i]Phenomenology of Spirit[/i]. As philosophically borked as it is, a tome which manages to zig-zag from a discussion of indexicals to Greek tragedy to phrenology to the French Revolution (among other things) is somewhat entertaining in an intellectual-roller-coaster sort of way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Not The Philosopher' timestamp='1347558278' post='2482035']
I actually liked the [i]Phenomenology of Spirit[/i]. As philosophically borked as it is, a tome which manages to zig-zag from a discussion of indexicals to Greek tragedy to phrenology to the French Revolution (among other things) is somewhat entertaining in an intellectual-roller-coaster sort of way.
[/quote]

Lol! I wish I had thought of it that way. I thought it was infuriatingly indirect. To be perfectly honest, I think Hegel was actively trying to obscure whatever it was he was saying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You might be interested in this 5-part podcast by David Cayley where he interviews five contemporary thinkers. The series is entitled "After Atheism." It's from CBC Radio in Canada.

[url="http://www.cbc.ca/ideas/podcasts/"]http://www.cbc.ca/ideas/podcasts/[/url]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...