kujo Posted May 30, 2012 Share Posted May 30, 2012 How the heck has this not been sent to the Lame board yet? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cmotherofpirl Posted May 30, 2012 Share Posted May 30, 2012 we lack other entertainment at present.... amuse us Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Papist Posted May 30, 2012 Share Posted May 30, 2012 Where's the nearest gay thread? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MIKolbe Posted May 30, 2012 Share Posted May 30, 2012 ask hasan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Papist Posted May 30, 2012 Share Posted May 30, 2012 he's in there with adrill Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kujo Posted May 30, 2012 Share Posted May 30, 2012 [quote name='cmotherofpirl' timestamp='1338386098' post='2437764'] we lack other entertainment at present.... amuse us [/quote] Tried to spark a fire with Soc earlier...hasn't happened yet... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cmotherofpirl Posted May 30, 2012 Share Posted May 30, 2012 Spark your own fire, don't rely on others... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AnneLine Posted May 30, 2012 Share Posted May 30, 2012 (edited) (Responding to FCC's comment last page...) I am an evil, evil influence, aren't i.... ? Edited May 30, 2012 by AnneLine Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Papist Posted May 30, 2012 Share Posted May 30, 2012 And slow responder Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheoGrad07 Posted May 30, 2012 Share Posted May 30, 2012 [quote name='FuturePriest387' timestamp='1338355398' post='2437677'] See, qfnol? It all works out. Besides, the Eastern Rite is so small I think they would take anyone they could get. [/quote] Even so, the wife is also "called" to the service of the Church -- not in the same way as the husband (obviously) but she most definitely participates in his vocation! So ... to bring the two conversations in this thread together ... the wife of a priest would most definitely need to wear a very modest swimsuit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Annie12 Posted May 30, 2012 Author Share Posted May 30, 2012 [quote name='TheoGrad07' timestamp='1338400884' post='2437860'] Even so, the wife is also "called" to the service of the Church -- not in the same way as the husband (obviously) but she most definitely participates in his vocation! So ... to bring the two conversations in this thread together ... the wife of a priest would most definitely need to wear a very modest swimsuit. [/quote] AH! HA! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
franciscanheart Posted May 30, 2012 Share Posted May 30, 2012 Am I the only person here who thinks the picture of Kim Kardashian in a two-piece (since removed) isn't offensive? I mean, it wasn't a string! It looks a lot like the suits linked to by someone else in this same thread. People oo-ed and aah-ed over those but Kim? THAT'S JUST TOO MUCH. Meanwhile, men walk around in banana hammocks or board shorts and it ain't no thang. Okay, so maybe the banana hammocks are a bit much (and we can all agree on it), but their chests are (generally speaking) still showing and hi, that's not much different for any straight or bisexual woman than a woman's chest is for any straight or bisexual man. YES I JUST GOT THAT ARGUMENT STARTED. So sue me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cmotherofpirl Posted May 30, 2012 Share Posted May 30, 2012 I don't know who she was, nor do I really care, but I liked the bathing suit, had no problem with it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lil Red Posted May 30, 2012 Share Posted May 30, 2012 [quote name='franciscanheart' timestamp='1338402282' post='2437875'] Am I the only person here who thinks the picture of Kim Kardashian in a two-piece (since removed) isn't offensive? I mean, it wasn't a string! It looks a lot like the suits linked to by someone else in this same thread. People oo-ed and aah-ed over those but Kim? THAT'S JUST TOO MUCH. Meanwhile men walk around in banana hammocks or board shorts and it ain't no thang. Okay, so maybe the banana hammocks are a bit much (and we can all agree on it), but their chests are (generally speaking) still showing and hi, that's not much different for any straight or bisexual woman than a woman's chest is for any straight or bisexual man. YES I JUST GOT THAT ARGUMENT STARTED. So sue me. [/quote] how is this relatively modest (according to the world's standards) bikini and the woman wearing it "offensive", "gross", "highly improper"? it's a swimsuit - and she's actually swimming. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cmotherofpirl Posted May 30, 2012 Share Posted May 30, 2012 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts