Jump to content
An Old School Catholic Message Board

Sspx: Preamble Signed


Brother Adam

Recommended Posts

Brother Adam

http://wdtprs.com/blog/2012/04/has-sspx-bp-fellay-signed-the-cdfs-doctrinal-preamble-tornielli-says-yes/

I have read Andrea Tornielli’s report on Vatican Insider that SSPX Bp. Fellay as SIGNED the CDF’s “Doctrinal Preamble”. Italian [url="http://vaticaninsider.lastampa.it/homepage/vaticano/dettaglio-articolo/articolo/lefebvriani-lefebvrians-lefebvrianos-14410/"]HERE[/url].[indent]
Il superiore della Fraternità San Pio X ha sottoscritto il preambolo dottrinale proposto dalla Santa Sede, anche se con qualche lieve modifica
…
The Superior of the Society of Saint Pius X has signed the doctrinal preamble proposed by the Holy See, even if with a few minor changes[/indent]
The preamble probably contains a Profession of Faith, basically the Creed. When I worked in Ecclesia Dei, priests who wanted to be reconciled with Rome had to sign an “Adhesio fidei” which was basically the Creed. Men who hold ecclesial offices have to take something similar. It is not very remarkable, all in all.

Tornielli suggests that this Preamble would also contain a statement about “religiosum obsequium… religious submission” will and intellect to the Magisterium. Thus, for some SSPXers such a “Preamble” could be seen as containing a trap to cut off dialogue.

It is likely that whatever else Bp. Fellay might have wanted in the Preamble, there could be something about freedom to continue to discuss disputed points even of Magisterial teachings that are not de fide. (Something I have proposed all along. Dulles’ book Magisterium could be helpful for the average reader to understand what the parameters of discussion and dissent are and to what we must give “religiosum obsequium”.)

All in all, a great rumor and even better if true. Let’s pray that it is.
If it isn’t time to [i]chill[/i] the Veuve quite yet, it is time to [i]buy[/i] the Veuve.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Groo the Wanderer' timestamp='1334716774' post='2419961']
so...do we fold em into the FSSP or do they remain separate?
[/quote]Making them the same would be like making the Dominicans and Franciscans the same order.

:-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='qfnol31' timestamp='1334719307' post='2420003']
Making them the same would be like making the Dominicans and Franciscans the same order.

:-)
[/quote]

I nearly spit out my water. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Groo the Wanderer' timestamp='1334716774' post='2419961']
so...do we fold em into the FSSP or do they remain separate?
[/quote]

They won't come back if they would have to be folded into the FSSP. They are already their own society so they don't have to become some part of a different group.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='dominicansoul' timestamp='1334726340' post='2420052']
i hope its true...
[/quote]I know a priest at the nunciature who thinks it is. He posted a French article on this on Facebook the other day. It sounds very much like it is happening.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tab'le De'Bah-Rye

yes pray for the lost sheep, there are some possibly within the church too :) Dear LORD, please bless the lost sheep whether practising within your holy roman catholic church or not that your will may be done in there lives, Our Father whom art in heaven , hallowed be thy name,thy kingdom come,thy will be done,on earth as it is in heaven,give us this day our daily bread,and forgive us our tresspasses as we forgive those whom tresspass against us,lead us not into temptation but deliver us from evil. Amen :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Groo the Wanderer

[quote name='qfnol31' timestamp='1334719307' post='2420003']
Making them the same would be like making the Dominicans and Franciscans the same order.

:-)
[/quote]

LORF!

not really. The FSSP was founded by members of the SSPX who thought they went too far with their refusal to submit to the Pope. I go to an FSSP parish once in a while, esp if I need a really orthodox confessor

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the SSPX has confirmed the story is true and a modified preamble has indeed been signed. the Ecclesia Dei Commission has confirmed this and will be studying it, looks like we can look forward to halfway through may for a possible response.

do not expect that the SSPX will be coming back with their tail between their legs or anything. this is not the same type of deal the FSSP made, and as such the subtle differences between the FSSP and the SSPX will justify them being two different Fraternities in the Church. +Fellay said in a letter written recently--actually after he had signed this preamble--that they would not accept anything that compromised their positions on doctrines. I think part of the ministry of the SSPX will be to continue in their stricter traditionalism and in their criticisms (probably slightly more tempered) of widespread problems in the Church. Rome will not be of accord with them in their criticisms, but will recognize the usefulness of this ministry and that their positions do not stand in the way of them being Catholics in good standing. I think the situation in Austria has hopefully startled Rome to the point that they can recognize the value in a prelature that is as harsh as the SSPX; if nothing else to balance things out with organizations currently within the Church with much more startling and problematic forms of liberal heterodoxy.

anyway, I think it's pretty safe to say at this point that regularization is imminent. there will be people on both sides that throw temper tantrums over this, so we must pray for the Holy Father as they will be harsh to him, likely even at high levels of the curia. on the SSPX side, I think (or maybe this is just me hoping) that the length of time Fellay has taken since the Preamble was first proposed has included strong actions taken to minimize any potential splintering. I think it's likely we'll see the splintering as very minimal, with most of the chapels following the Superior General into regular canonical ministry.

Edited by Aloysius
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Pontifical Commission Ecclesia Dei has published the following communication concerning the Society of St. Pius X:
"The text of the response of Bishop Bernard Fellay, Superior General of the Priestly Society of Saint Pius X, as had been requested at the meeting of 16 March 2012, was received by the Congregation of the Doctrine of the Faith on 17 April 2012. The text will be examined by the Dicastery and then submitted to the judgement of the Holy Father.

Fr. Federico Lombardi, head of the Vatican Press Office, said that, with the latest response, “steps forward have been taken, that is to say, that the response, the new response, is rather encouraging. But there are still developments that will be made, and examined, and decisions which should be taken in the next few weeks.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...