Winchester Posted March 11, 2012 Share Posted March 11, 2012 [quote name='add' timestamp='1331475095' post='2399054'] hope [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U7pv7sO5Gng[/media] sing it, girls [/quote] [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pZCyOWLrRTE[/media] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
add Posted March 11, 2012 Share Posted March 11, 2012 [quote name='add' timestamp='1331475095' post='2399054'] hope [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U7pv7sO5Gng[/media] sing it, girls [/quote] [size=2]Doesn’t Rick Santorum, daughter have a lovely voice (game on).[/size] Did you know that this young lady is homschooled, apparently celebrities like “Bill Maher†can attack Republican presidential candidate Rick Santorum, his children Christians, and anyone that homeschools their children. In his final New Rule on HBO's Real Time, Maher said, "Rick Santorum homeschools his children because he does not want them eating [from the Tree of Knowledge]. He wants them locked up in the Christian madrassa that is the family living room not out in public where they could be infected by the virus of reason" Funny, how the left can get away with such derogatory rhetoric. Hypocrisy: thy name is "Bill" the Democrat shill!! . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winchester Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 Did someone defend Bill Maher, or are you just disinterested in dealing with the real Rick Santorum, big government shill, who wishes to maintain our corporatist structure? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
add Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 So, you and Bill are bud's? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winchester Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 [quote name='add' timestamp='1331515374' post='2399269'] So, you and Bill are bud's? [/quote] Are Bud's whats? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
add Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 [quote name='Winchester' timestamp='1331515569' post='2399272'] Are Bud's whats? [/quote] Buddies, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winchester Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 [quote name='add' timestamp='1331516091' post='2399283'] Buddies, [/quote] I doubt we know the same Bud. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 (edited) Getting raped and becoming pregnant is not a blessing. Although I don't agree with a woman who would have an abortion after that happened. I don't blame her one bit. Now if limbo was real I might have a different opinion but its not. So this is a rare instance where I think a woman should have her choice 100 percent. Sorry for derailing the thread. Edited March 12, 2012 by Guest Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aloysius Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 getting raped is not a blessing at all, the baby IS a blessing, though. all babies are, no matter who their fathers are or what the circumstances of their conception were. for many women, it would be too hard to keep the baby and not think of the circumstances of his conception, and such women ought to put that baby up for adoption. but I would encourage anyone to think of that baby's true origins beyond the terrible conception--that baby came from the finger of Almighty God, he has a unique purpose and dignity and an eternal destiny, and he is not responsible for the evil that his biological father carried out in conceiving him. no one can be blamed for how they were conceived. plenty of people were conceived in drunkenness and fornication, plenty were conceived in unnatural test-tubes, some were conceived in rape or slavery--but once you exist, you are a special human being deserving the same love and care as any other. you cannot kill a baby, DB, even if you think that baby will go straight to heaven, murder is still evil. by your logic above (if I understand your meaning, your blurb about limbo), it'd be almost virtuous to stand outside a confessional and slaughter everyone as soon as they came out, it's not like they're going to hell or limbo. it is not for us to decide who lives and who dies. Personally, I'd be willing to stomach Santorum's fake-conservative big government carp (I wouldn't like it, but I'd stomach it and enjoy having a president who goes to Latin Mass) if he weren't such a bloodthirsty warmonger. I'm sorry, but the assasination of the Iranian scientists was not acceptable, and the continued beating of the wardrums without even seriously working towards peaceful solutions is immoral. his immoral stance on war is an absolute deal-breaker for me, whatever else my problems may be with him (in that I think he's tied into the corrupt lobbyist establishment machine and has monetarily profited from selling out the rule of our government to lobbyists, having himself been a lobbyist) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 Aloysius what's up. I agree with everything you say. I guess I have a hard time seeing how it isn't the mothers choice when she is raped. I find it tough to tell a woman she has to have the baby in this case. You make great points I agree with though. Godbless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 (edited) And I don't think babies who die will go straight to heaven. I KNOW. Where else would they go ? Limbo is something that is not even close to being rational and I don't see how the Church ever taught it. I really don't and I'm glad its a non issue anymore. Its so out there and a complete joke. I have been on a site where traditional catholics still try to argue it and it makes me cringe. If the church still stuck by limbo I would not hesitate to leave the church. I would be gone just like that. Like I said I'm glad limbo has been put to rest. Edited March 12, 2012 by Guest Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winchester Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 Theoretical Cafeteria Catholic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Basilisa Marie Posted March 12, 2012 Author Share Posted March 12, 2012 [quote name='FuturePriest387' timestamp='1331441517' post='2398978'] He's going on things from a Catholic perspective, and so far, people are liking it. If he's supposed to shut up and not speak what he believes as a Catholic because this is America, than this system is corrupt, this society is corrupt, and I've lost all hope. He can't just be quiet to get elected. That's what people claim to hate about politicians, and yet when they do what they ask they freak out. I'm not saying that's what you're doing, but it's what many people do. They need to decide what they want and stick with it. [/quote] The point is he DOESN'T speak for all Catholics, nor is completely and perfectly in line with everything the Church teaches. That's the original reason why I started this thread - because I know he doesn't line up perfectly with the Church, and Catholicvote is making him out to be this amazing candidate who champions the teachings of the Church. Granted, I don't think there is a candidate who perfectly lines up with Church teaching. But I think there are better ones, and that Santorum has a responsibility to do a better job of it particularly because he runs around flaunting how Catholic he is. He had his Super Tuesday post-election thingy in Steubenville, for crying out loud. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
add Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 [quote name='Basilisa Marie' timestamp='1331570380' post='2399613'] The point is he DOESN'T speak for all Catholics, nor is completely and perfectly in line with everything the Church teaches. That's the original reason why I started this thread - because I know he doesn't line up perfectly with the Church, and Catholicvote is making him out to be this amazing candidate who champions the teachings of the Church. Granted, I don't think there is a candidate who perfectly lines up with Church teaching. But I think there are better ones, and that Santorum has a responsibility to do a better job of it particularly because he runs around flaunting how Catholic he is. He had his Super Tuesday post-election thingy in Steubenville, for crying out loud. [/quote] I would much rather vote for a weak catholic than an atheistic socialist (any day of the week). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winchester Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 [quote name='add' timestamp='1331575992' post='2399663'] I would much rather vote for a weak catholic than an atheistic socialist (any day of the week). [/quote] You fall for the trappings of religious speech, and reject the substance of his behavior. I'll take the candidate who supports subsidiarity and life through his words [i]and [/i]his actions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now