Is It Sinful To...?

[KarenJoanna]

eat candies , that we know that the company testes on animals since it's animal cruelty?what about using make up products etc?

[cappie]

[i]Principles of cooperation[/i]
The principles of double effect and tolerance show that it is impossible, under many circumstances, for an individual to do good in the world without being involved to some extent in evil. The principles of cooperation were developed in the Catholic moral tradition as a way of helping individuals discern how to properly avoid, limit, or distance themselves from evil (especially intrinsic evil) in order to avoid a worse evil or to achieve an important good.[list=1]
[*]
[i]Formal Cooperation[/i]. Formal cooperation occurs when a person freely participates in the action(s) of a principal agent, or shares in the agent’s intention, either for its own sake or as a means to some other goal. [i]Implicit[/i] formal cooperation occurs when, even though the cooperator denies intending the object of the principal agent, the cooperating person or organization participates in the action directly and in such a way that the it could not be done without this participation. Formal cooperation in intrinsically evil actions, either explicitly or implicitly, is morally illicit.
[*]
[i]Immediate Material Cooperation[/i]. Immediate material cooperation occurs when the cooperator participates in circumstances that are essential to the commission of an act, such that the act could not occur without this participation. Immediate material cooperation in intrinsically evil actions is morally illicit. There has been in the tradition a debate about the permissibility of immediate cooperation in immoral acts under "duress." When individuals are forced under duress (e.g. at gunpoint) to cooperate in the intrinsically evil action of another, they act with diminished freedom. Following Church teaching, the [i]matter[/i] of their action remains objectively evil, but they do not [i]intend[/i] this object with true freedom. In such cases, the matter remains objectively evil as such, but the subjective culpability of the cooperator is diminished.
[*]
[i]Mediate Material Cooperation[/i]. Mediate material cooperation occurs when the cooperator participates in circumstances that are not essential to the commission of an action, such that the action could occur even without this cooperation. Mediate material cooperation in an immoral act might be justifiable under three basic conditions:
[/list][list=1]
[*]
If there is a proportionately serious reason for the cooperation (i.e.,for the sake of protecting an important good or for avoiding a worse harm); the graver the evil the more serious a reason required for the cooperation;
[*]
The importance of the reason for cooperation must be proportionate to the causal proximity of the cooperator’s action to the action of the principal agent (the distinction between proximate and remote);
[*]
The danger of scandal (i.e. leading others into doing evil, leading others into error, or spreading confusion) must be avoided.
[/list]
This is the standard by which we act. As you can see the cases you mention would come under the third number. So It would not be sinful as you are not directly cooperating with animal cruelty. It may be better to avoid such products if possible, but that would be a personal choice