Groo the Wanderer Posted February 17, 2012 Share Posted February 17, 2012 bring it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CatherineM Posted February 17, 2012 Share Posted February 17, 2012 I was thinking about his assertion that 98% of Catholics are using birth control. First off, I doubt that 98% of Catholics are of child bearing age. Of those that are of child bearing age, 10-15% are infertile. That's 5th grade math. Maybe they didn't teach percentages in his Muslim grade school. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elizabeth09 Posted February 17, 2012 Share Posted February 17, 2012 [size=4]The Catholic Church must not stand with this. Prayers for this "manhole" not to get pass us. [/size] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
add Posted February 18, 2012 Author Share Posted February 18, 2012 [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P3yDJEnnmm8&feature=player_[/media] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
add Posted February 19, 2012 Author Share Posted February 19, 2012 Perhaps Pelosi should consider the fact that the Church would rather call itself a fool in the eyes of men (and women) than a fool in the eyes of God. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kujo Posted February 19, 2012 Share Posted February 19, 2012 [quote name='Socrates' timestamp='1329351744' post='2387731'] Make no mistake. This HHS mandate is simply a strategic first step, and ultimately the goal is not about contraception, which was never really an issue. Contraceptives can be obtained cheaply and easily everywhere, and there have been no complaints filed by women against Catholic employers not covering their contraception. But this is the first step. If Obama and the radical feminist, pro-abort lobby he is beholden to can successfully mandate that all employers must provide insurance to pay for contraception (including pills that are in actuality abortifacients) regardless of the religious beliefs of employers, then they can next require that they cover abortion pills such as RU-486 (since, after all, the courts have declared abortion a "constitutional right"), then dictate that they cover flat-out surgical abortions. That's not a "slippery-slope" fallacy, but similar to the legal process that led up to Roe v. Wade. Team Obama knows exactly what it's up to on this one. Don't be fooled; he really is "all that bad." [/quote] I actually agree with Soc....uh oh... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MIKolbe Posted February 19, 2012 Share Posted February 19, 2012 nice to know you can be trained. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kujo Posted February 20, 2012 Share Posted February 20, 2012 [quote name='MIkolbe' timestamp='1329694168' post='2389651'] nice to know you can be trained. [/quote] my fiancee is currently training me to put the seat down after I use the potty. I don't quite understand why I have to do it--there's just as much chance (if not more) that it will be me going in there to use the facilities, and why should I have to bend down to lift the seat in order to do so? Feminism is lamesauce! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MIKolbe Posted February 20, 2012 Share Posted February 20, 2012 next time i'm in O, she's coming right? She is coolness Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kujo Posted February 20, 2012 Share Posted February 20, 2012 [quote name='MIkolbe' timestamp='1329696797' post='2389687'] next time i'm in O, she's coming right? She is coolness [/quote] Yessir! She was jealous of my night out when you were here, and will definitely want to tag along next time! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
add Posted February 20, 2012 Author Share Posted February 20, 2012 [quote name='add' timestamp='1329580085' post='2388939'] [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P3yDJEnnmm8&feature=player_[/media] [/quote] Dear nancy, This was not a hearing on women's rights, it was a hearing about religious rights. it's religious rights that are being infringed upon here... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Annie12 Posted February 20, 2012 Share Posted February 20, 2012 Obama has proven that he has no intention of protecting the church's values in any way, shape, or form. Not only did he stand before Notre Dame graduates and say that he would ( protect religious conscience) but he lied to the Pope! Catholics should NOT vote for him again if they care one bit about the church the say they love. I know I will not vote for him! Check this out! : http://foro.univision.com/t5/Al-Punto/Obama-Lied-to-Pope-Obamacare-Will-Force-Americans-to-Fund/td-p/348508732/page/3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winchester Posted February 21, 2012 Share Posted February 21, 2012 Catholics shouldn't have voted for him the first time. Anyone stupid enough to vote for him once is so massively stupid that they are unlikely to overcome their incredible stupidity and not vote for him, this time. Those not voting for him generally will reject him because the economy isn't shifted into yet another unsustainable bubble. Not because they realized his policies are a complete freaking disaster, or because they realized he's yet another stooge continuing the alliance between big business and government. Not because they have had any meaningful political realizations, but just because government didn't magically fix every flooping problem with regulations and policies and all that other croutons sheep think government can do, if it just adds more laws. Luckily, some are enamoured with not having war, so they will vote Ron Paul. But he supports the social safety net, Winnie! And calling people stupid is mean! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
add Posted March 3, 2012 Author Share Posted March 3, 2012 WASHINGTON, D.C., March 2, 2012, ([url="http://lifesitenews.com/"]LifeSiteNews.com[/url]) – Under new guidelines issued by the Obama administration, immigration agents [url="http://dailycaller.com/2012/03/01/transgender-hormone-treatments-abortion-access-for-detained-illegals-irks-congressman/?print=1"]must provide taxpayer-funded abortion services[/url], transportation to the abortion clinic, and transgender hormone therapy for illegal aliens awaiting deportation. The policy overhaul is contained in the [url="http://www.lifesitenews.com/images/pdfs/pbnds2011.pdf"]Performance-Based National Detention Standards (PBNDS) of 2011[/url], issued by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), a part of the Department of Homeland Security. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HopefulBride Posted March 3, 2012 Share Posted March 3, 2012 (edited) Why am I looking in this thread? It's ruining my Lent.... Cause all I want to do is (I won't say it here, public forum and all) But seriously, the ridiculous croutons that this lady and her colleagues are spewing make me sick to my stomach. And I have my opinion of the president and those who voted for him but I already got my list of stuff to confess and I don't wish to add to it. Edited because in my anger, I left out a word or two. Fingers couldn't keep up. Edited March 3, 2012 by HopefulBride Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now