Dont Like Bush Or Kerry?

[CreepyCrawler]

double sorry

Edited May 3, 2004 by CreepyCrawler

[CreepyCrawler]

those were really funny links lounge daddy!

the hanger thing when abortion was illegal is less disgusting as women dying at the hands of incompetent abortionists and in unsanitary clinics that have fewer regulations than veterinary clinics in this country? who do we have to thank for that? pro-choicers who are so against any type of regulation that they'd rather have women die than actually have standards for abortion clinics. the only different between pre- and post-roe is that the 'back-alley butchers' are government paid, pro-choicer supported, legally working butchers.

[crusader1234]

joe schriner is a crazy crazy.

[BeenaBobba]

[quote name='JP2Iloveyou' date='May 2 2004, 02:56 PM'] Trying2BFaithful, worthy goal, but I don't think that it is a good way to state it. I would put instead that all Catholic families should be open to the number of children that God chooses to bless them with. Whether that is one, two, ten, or somewhere in the middle is up to him. Many people cannot afford the money to adopt children. Here's a novel idea. Liberals always want out tax dollars to go to fund abortions for "poor women." Why not have our tax dollars go to fund adoptions for "poor families?"

[/quote]
You make an excellent point there, JP2Iloveyou.

[quote]BeenaBobba, I know you were not advocating that position.  I was merely spelling out a sound logical argument against someone who does use that argument.[/quote]

Okay. I just wanted to make sure because it did [i]seem[/i] like you were referring to me. But I know otherwise now.

God bless,

Jennifer

[BeenaBobba]

[quote name='CreepyCrawler' date='May 2 2004, 08:29 PM'] those were really funny links lounge daddy!

the hanger thing when abortion was illegal is less disgusting as women dying at the hands of incompetent abortionists and in unsanitary clinics that have fewer regulations than veterinary clinics in this country? who do we have to thank for that? pro-choicers who are so against any type of regulation that they'd rather have women die than actually have standards for abortion clinics. the only different between pre- and post-roe is that the 'back-alley butchers' are government paid, pro-choicer supported, legally working butchers. [/quote]
Did you click on the link I posted earlier detailing the number of deaths that were due to abortion complications prior to the legalization of abortion? If you read [url="http://www.roevwade.org/abortdeaths.html"]this[/url] as well, you will see that the number of women dying from [i]legalized[/i] abortions isn't much less than the number of women's deaths related to illegal abortion. Of course, pro-"choicers" will never admit to that. [url="http://www.roevwade.org/unsafe.html"]Here[/url] are some stories detailing very unsafe [b]legal[/b] abortions.

This particular argument used by pro-"choicers" can be easily shattered.

God bless,

Jennifer

Edited May 3, 2004 by BeenaBobba

[musturde]

Is Nader Pro abortion? He may be Maronite cuz he's Lebanese and I heard Christian. (either he's maronite[Catholic], Orthodox, or unlikely some other protestant sect)

[JP2Iloveyou]

Nader is most definitely pro-abortion, even moreso than John Kerry if that is even possible.

[musturde]

dang :'(... I guess I'm stuck with Bush :-P

[azaelia]

Bush is definitely the lesser of the evils in the situation. So I'm for Bush all the way this year.

There's a little book out for serious Catholics on how to vote. We carry it in the bookstore I work at, but I don't know where else you'd be able to get it. I'll look it up...