Deus te Amat Posted October 2, 2011 Share Posted October 2, 2011 I'd rather not have to wear sunglasses while phatmassing. I vote no. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheresaThoma Posted October 2, 2011 Share Posted October 2, 2011 I also voted no. I have seen many forums where there are pic in the signature and it begins to look extremely cluttered. I especially hate when someone's signature takes up more space than their actual post EVERY TIME because they have so much stuff in it. It gets annoying when you have to scroll past someone's sig over and over again, you lose the "flow" of the thread. Finally I feel that it can become very competitive about who has the "best" signature and people start putting lots time into their sigs rather than being a thoughtful contributor to the forums. Ok I'll get off my soapbox now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AccountDeleted Posted October 2, 2011 Share Posted October 2, 2011 [quote name='LaPetiteSoeur' timestamp='1317528731' post='2313690'] Now that I've read the comments I"m changing my "yes" to a "no." I forgot some have to pay for bandwith! [/quote] Aren't you sweet?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MissScripture Posted October 2, 2011 Share Posted October 2, 2011 [quote name='IcePrincessKRS' timestamp='1317516613' post='2313568'] I vote no, unless you can limit it so that they are smaller than avatars. When people start posting bigger pictures it's ugly and annoying. I liked when we had the old "signature avatars", but it was an either-or thing, we never had both. I've been to forums that have both and I don't like it. [/quote] Icy says it best. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vincent Vega Posted October 2, 2011 Share Posted October 2, 2011 I vote "idc". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaime Posted October 2, 2011 Share Posted October 2, 2011 [quote name='IcePrincessKRS' timestamp='1317516613' post='2313568'] I vote no, unless you can limit it so that they are smaller than avatars. When people start posting bigger pictures it's ugly and annoying. I liked when we had the old "signature avatars", but it was an either-or thing, we never had both. I've been to forums that have both and I don't like it. [/quote] [quote name='homeschoolmom' timestamp='1317516762' post='2313569'] This. [/quote] that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ash Wednesday Posted October 2, 2011 Share Posted October 2, 2011 I hated the signature avatars. I say just having an avatar is enough, otherwise the place will get all cluttered up. Less is more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
morostheos Posted October 3, 2011 Share Posted October 3, 2011 [quote name='IcePrincessKRS' timestamp='1317516613' post='2313568'] I vote no, unless you can limit it so that they are smaller than avatars. When people start posting bigger pictures it's ugly and annoying. I liked when we had the old "signature avatars", but it was an either-or thing, we never had both. I've been to forums that have both and I don't like it. [/quote] My thoughts precisely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now