Lil Red Posted June 20, 2011 Share Posted June 20, 2011 [quote]Somehow, we need to start getting people to look at unwanted pregnancies as they do co-joined twins. If there must be a separation, the lives of both people need to be taken into consideration and the separation done in as safe a manner as possible to both of them.[/quote] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IcePrincessKRS Posted June 20, 2011 Share Posted June 20, 2011 That's just.... mind boggling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sixpence Posted June 20, 2011 Share Posted June 20, 2011 huh? seems to make sense to me.... view both the mom and baby as equals (like conjoined twins)... not that the mom's opinion body takes precedence (as seems to be the view of society today)... and obviously the safest way to separate them is to give birth normally... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carmenchristi Posted June 20, 2011 Share Posted June 20, 2011 [quote name='sixpence' timestamp='1308601707' post='2256426'] huh? seems to make sense to me.... view both the mom and baby as equals (like conjoined twins)... not that the mom's opinion body takes precedence (as seems to be the view of society today)... and obviously the safest way to separate them is to give birth normally... [/quote] I agree.... don't see a problem here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Totus Tuus Posted June 20, 2011 Share Posted June 20, 2011 [quote name='carmenchristi' timestamp='1308603601' post='2256445'] I agree.... don't see a problem here. [/quote] Maybe the context was that they were actually talking about abortion. Obviously in that sense the lives of both are never taken into consideration. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IcePrincessKRS Posted June 20, 2011 Share Posted June 20, 2011 Yeah, the way I read it was that they are using this argument to be IN FAVOR of abortion. (You know, because of the thread title. Context.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
franciscanheart Posted June 20, 2011 Share Posted June 20, 2011 That sounds like something I would think up. My brain is weird. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OnlySunshine Posted June 20, 2011 Share Posted June 20, 2011 That really doesn't make any sense--especially this part: [quote]the separation done in as safe a manner as possible to both of them.[/quote] How is it a safe manner if the baby is killed off just because the mother doesn't want it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
franciscanheart Posted June 20, 2011 Share Posted June 20, 2011 [quote name='MaterMisericordiae' timestamp='1308607672' post='2256502'] That really doesn't make any sense--especially this part: How is it a safe manner if the baby is killed off just because the mother doesn't want it? [/quote] The quote isn't supporting abortion: that's the key! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Totus Tuus Posted June 21, 2011 Share Posted June 21, 2011 [quote name='franciscanheart' timestamp='1308609993' post='2256528'] The quote isn't supporting abortion: that's the key! [/quote] Yes, it is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
franciscanheart Posted June 21, 2011 Share Posted June 21, 2011 [quote name='Totus Tuus' timestamp='1308616422' post='2256584'] Yes, it is. [/quote] How? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Totus Tuus Posted June 21, 2011 Share Posted June 21, 2011 (edited) [quote name='franciscanheart' timestamp='1308617146' post='2256590'] How? [/quote] The argument is being given in favor of abortion. I know that without context it wouldn't seem that way, but this thread seems to have made it clear that the context is in favor of abortion. Hence why Ice, and others, see it as ridiculous. Edited June 21, 2011 by Totus Tuus Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cherie Posted June 21, 2011 Share Posted June 21, 2011 How convoluted!!! It's not even remotely the same situation!!! Basically it's an argument that a woman should be able to do whatever she wants, because having a child as a result of an unplanned pregnancy will "ruin her life", and what child should be brought into a situation in which they're not "wanted" or "loved", hmm? That's their twisted way of saying the lives of both need to be taken into consideration. How utterly ridiculous. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lil Red Posted June 21, 2011 Author Share Posted June 21, 2011 okay, here's where I got it from: https://www.facebook.com/pages/Chicks-On-The-Right/195530355493 Scroll down to the post about "Nice Choice there Mara" and it's under the comments (4th one down) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winchester Posted June 21, 2011 Share Posted June 21, 2011 [quote name='Totus Tuus' timestamp='1308620707' post='2256623'] The argument is being given in favor of abortion. I know that without context it wouldn't seem that way, but this thread seems to have made it clear that the context is in favor of abortion. Hence why Ice, and others, see it as [s]ridiculous[/s]. [/quote] You misspelled "flooping stupid". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now