MIKolbe Posted April 24, 2011 Share Posted April 24, 2011 WELCOME!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lil Red Posted April 24, 2011 Share Posted April 24, 2011 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dominicansoul Posted April 24, 2011 Share Posted April 24, 2011 [quote name='Cam42' timestamp='1303659945' post='2231817'] Me likey the bible....thanks for sharing some of it....now maybe phatmass can love me a little. [/quote] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cam42 Posted April 24, 2011 Author Share Posted April 24, 2011 [quote name='dominicansoul' timestamp='1303672649' post='2231891'] [/quote] Still not looking for consolation. BTW....I cannot access PM, so you'll need to talk to me here...TPTB have taken that feature from me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MIKolbe Posted April 24, 2011 Share Posted April 24, 2011 [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oXdYrERzrWg[/media] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MIKolbe Posted April 24, 2011 Share Posted April 24, 2011 [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oXdYrERzrWg[/media] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cam42 Posted April 24, 2011 Author Share Posted April 24, 2011 [quote name='MIkolbe' timestamp='1303678971' post='2231943'] [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oXdYrERzrWg[/media] [/quote] http://youtu.be/e9Q3orQhEcA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MIKolbe Posted April 24, 2011 Share Posted April 24, 2011 [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zpBhrjfetkk&feature=related[/media] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cam42 Posted April 25, 2011 Author Share Posted April 25, 2011 http://youtu.be/ZmUlKPthrag Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ardillacid Posted April 25, 2011 Share Posted April 25, 2011 [quote name='Cam42' timestamp='1303600672' post='2231557'] Knows how St. Athanasius felt... [/quote] What is this I don't even Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nihil Obstat Posted April 25, 2011 Share Posted April 25, 2011 (edited) I believe Cam would be referring to the link he has been establishing between the historical heresy of Arianism (which was opposed especially by St. Athanasius), and the current heresy of Modernism (condemned most strongly by Pope St. Pius X). Or maybe Athanasius just looked really good in a cassock. Edited April 25, 2011 by Nihil Obstat Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cam42 Posted April 25, 2011 Author Share Posted April 25, 2011 [quote name='Nihil Obstat' timestamp='1303695134' post='2232005'] I believe Cam would be referring to the link he has been establishing between the historical heresy of Arianism (which was opposed especially by St. Athanasius), and the current heresy of Modernism (condemned most strongly by Pope St. Pius X). Or maybe Athanasius just looked really good in a cassock. [/quote] What he said... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aloysius Posted April 25, 2011 Share Posted April 25, 2011 Everyone who has openly supported the SSPX on phatmass has always been givin a phishy label. Phatmass very much does not want to be seen as a place where the position of the SSPX is considered correct in the Church, and therefore those who take that position. laymen who attend SSPX masses have incurred no ecclesiastic penalty and are indeed Catholics in good standing, though the priests themselves are not priests in good standing and are suspended a divinis. one should follow the Holy Father's lead with such people and be kind and gracious and extend every hand of communion to them because they indeed are not in schism from us, they are Catholics in good standing who weekly fulfill their sunday obligation. their position is to be opposed because it is a position which leans in a schismatic direction, and the masses they attend are illicit because the priests are suspended; but other than that, we can still be friends guys. we are still brothers inside the Church, even though one holds a position that is indeed contrary to the Church. as regards the removal of your status and the events surrounding that, I posted this as an aside in the other thread but it appears this is better related here: I was personally perturbed after having stood up for you before based upon your history and record when I suggested some leeway on legitimate opinions. It makes those positions look illegitimate, and your previous accusers correct, because your attitudes were indeed everything those against you feared that they were. but such is life, and you must follow your conscience, but be it known that my previous assessment of your attitude was pretty [b]deficient.[/b] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cam42 Posted April 25, 2011 Author Share Posted April 25, 2011 (edited) [quote name='Aloysius' timestamp='1303703370' post='2232100'] Everyone who has openly supported the SSPX on phatmass has always been givin a phishy label. Phatmass very much does not want to be seen as a place where the position of the SSPX is considered correct in the Church, and therefore those who take that position. laymen who attend SSPX masses have incurred no ecclesiastic penalty and are indeed Catholics in good standing, though the priests themselves are not priests in good standing and are suspended a divinis. one should follow the Holy Father's lead with such people and be kind and gracious and extend every hand of communion to them because they indeed are not in schism from us, they are Catholics in good standing who weekly fulfill their sunday obligation. their position is to be opposed because it is a position which leans in a schismatic direction, and the masses they attend are illicit because the priests are suspended; but other than that, we can still be friends guys. we are still brothers inside the Church, even though one holds a position that is indeed contrary to the Church. as regards the removal of your status and the events surrounding that, I posted this as an aside in the other thread but it appears this is better related here: I was personally perturbed after having stood up for you before based upon your history and record when I suggested some leeway on legitimate opinions. It makes those positions look illegitimate, and your previous accusers correct, because your attitudes were indeed everything those against you feared that they were. but such is life, and you must follow your conscience, but be it known that my previous assessment of your attitude was pretty [b]deficient.[/b] [/quote] You need to ammend. Laymen who attend SSPX masses have incurred no ecclesiastic penalty and are indeed Catholic in good standing [b]except at phatmass....[/b] And it sure seems that phatmass isn't being kind and extending every hand of communion, when one is labeled "phishy." I am willing to be friends, but phatmass sure isn't acting that way, now is it. Just how is the SSPX holding any position which is contrary to the Church? What part of the Church has the SSPX explicitly denied. You're holding a harder line than Rome, Al. With regard to the last paragraph....If you were perturbed, I'm sorry. This whole thing has nothing to do with me being traddy, this has to do with a beef that dUSt has with me. And just because something looks to be a certain way doesn't mean that it is, now does it? I wonder if you'll get edited for trolling me? Since you've now posted the same ad hominem in two separate threads? I somehow doubt it. Edited April 25, 2011 by Cam42 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roamin Catholic Posted April 25, 2011 Share Posted April 25, 2011 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now